IRCT20191221045841N1CompletedPhase 2
Comparison of Phacoemulsification + IOL Implantation and Silicone Oil Removal in One Session with Performing These Operations in Two Sessions
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Status
- Completed
- Enrollment
- 25
Study Overview
Brief Summary
No summary available.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- no limit to no limit (—)
- Sex
- All
Inclusion Criteria
- •This study is non-randomized in Imam Khomeini Hospital in Ahvaz at 2019-2020.
- •Patients with a diagnosis of cataract after vitrectomy and silicone oil injection into the study.
Exclusion Criteria
- •Patients who did not return for follow-up.
- •major ophthalmic surgeries with this type of surgery were excluded.
Investigators
Similar Trials
Unknown
Phase 4
Combined Phacotube vs Phacotrabeculectomy:A Randomized Controlled TrialGlaucomaCataractNCT00273221National University Hospital, Singapore50
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparison of Two Phacoemulsification-methods: EasyTip 2.2mm vs. Infusion Assisted EasyTip 2.2mmCataractsNCT01936727Medical University of Vienna50
Completed
Phase 2
Comparative Evaluation of Phacoemulsification with Goniosynechialysis and Phacoemulsification with Viscogonioplasty in Angle-Closure Glaucoma: A Randomized Clinical TrialPACGAngle-ClosureTo compare effectiveness of Phacoemulsification with goniosynechialysis and Phacoemulsification with viscogoniosynechialysis in Angle-Closure Glaucomagoniosynechialysisviscogoniosynechialysisacute angle closure attackTCTR20240805005o Dechathon Asanathong58
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparison of Two Phacoemulsification-methods: Low Fluidic EasyTip 2.2mm vs. High Fluidic EasyTip 2.2mmCataractsNCT01936714Medical University of Vienna50
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparison of Two Phacoemulsification-methods: HF EasyTip 2.2mm vs. HF EasyTip 2.8mmCataractsNCT01936740Medical University of Vienna50