TCTR20161104002
Completed
Phase 4
Videolaryngoscope Compares to Direct Laryngoscopes for Nasogastric Placement
Overview
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Patients with indicated for NGT insertion and age more than 18 years were enrolled.
- Sponsor
- o
- Enrollment
- 84
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- last year
Overview
Brief Summary
No summary available.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Patients with indicated for NGT insertion and age more than 18 years were enrolled
Exclusion Criteria
- •Patients with deformities of pharynx or larynx, esophageal pathology, unstable of cervical spine and coagulopathy
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Not specified
Similar Trials
Recruiting
Not Applicable
A study on use of videolaryngoscope and conventional laryngoscope for insertion of endotracheal tube in mannequin by medical studentsCTRI/2017/11/010491Ramaiah Medical College and Hospitals
Completed
Phase 1
Video laryngoscope verses direct laryngoscope for endotracheal intubation among elective surgeries in Orotta and Halibet National Referral Hospitals Asmara, Eritrea.PACTR202309750598928Orotta College of Medicne and Health Sciences96
Not yet recruiting
Phase 1
Comparison between direct and video laryngoscope,in securing the airway in patients who are not suspected to have difficult airway.Health Condition 1: J989- Respiratory disorder, unspecifiedCTRI/2021/05/033361Shri B M Patil Medical College
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
Video Laryngoscope versus Direct Laryngoscope and postoperative sore throatACTRN12624000805572Western Sydney Local Health Disctrict100
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparison of videolaryngoscopy and direct laryngoscopy by German paramedics during out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation. An observational prospective study.Resuscitation, Out of Hospital CPR, Airway ManagementDRKS00020976niversitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg, Standort Marburg97