Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01516164
NCT01516164CompletedNot Applicable

A Comparison of the Ease of Tracheal Intubation Using a McGrath MAC Laryngoscope and a Standard MacIntosh Laryngoscope

NHS Tayside1 site in 1 country158 target enrollmentStarted: March 2012Last updated:
Conditions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
158
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Intubation Difficulty Score

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Videolaryngoscopes offer the potential to make tracheal intubation easier for the anaesthetist and less traumatic for the patient. This study aims to compare the intubation difficulty scores (a validated scoring system for ease of intubation) using the McGrath MAC as a videolaryngoscope, the McGrath MAC only as a direct laryngoscope (without video screen) and the MacIntosh laryngoscopes.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Single (Participant)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
16 Years to — (Child, Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Elective procedure requiring oral tracheal tube intubation
  • Over 16 years of age
  • Airway assessment suggests to the anaesthetist that a standard MacIntosh laryngoscope approach to intubation would be appropriate.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Emergency procedure
  • Less than 16 years of age
  • Unable to consent
  • Requiring Rapid Sequence Induction (a specialised anaesthetic induction technique)
  • Predicted difficult intubation
  • Not suitable for the standardised induction technique

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Intubation Difficulty Score

Time Frame: 5 minutes

The Intubation Difficulty Scale (IDS) is a numerical score based on seven parameters. The scoring of each parameter represents a divergence from an 'ideal' condition and the total score represents a sum divergence from a zero difficulty ideal intubation. The seven parameters are number of supplementary attempts, number of supplementary operators, number and type of alternative techniques used, laryngoscopic grade, subjective lifting force, the use of external laryngeal manipulation and mobility or position of the vocal cords.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Time to intubation(5 minutes)
  • Number and types of alternative techniques used(5 minutes)
  • Perception of force used(5 minutes)
  • Complications(5 minutes)
  • Ease of intubation(5 minutes)
  • Failure to intubate(5 minutes)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other Gov
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Dr Claire Wallace

Dr Claire Wallace SpR Anaesthetics

NHS Tayside

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials