A comparative evaluation of TAScope ( The Anesthetist Society scope) and Video-assisted Macintosh laryngoscope for endotracheal intubation in simulated difficult airway: A randomized study.
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 招募中
- 发起方
- NA
- 入组人数
- 64
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- To compare intubation difficulty scale (IDS) score, rate of
研究概览
简要总结
The purpose of the study is the comparative evaluation of TAScope and video-assisted
McIntosh laryngoscope for endotracheal intubation in simulated difficult airway.
Videolaryngoscopes make the learning process easy as they do not require alignment of
oral, pharyngeal, tracheal axis and also provide a magnified view. Both TAScope and
Video-assisted McIntosh are indigenously developed with use of endoscopic cameras. The
difference being the angulation provided in TAScope for better Glottic visualisation. The
idea of the study is to evaluate whether there is role of angulation of blade in
videolaryngoscopes and which amongst these devices can prove to be a better, safer and
economical option for securing an airway during anticipated and unanticipated intubation.
AIM- To compare TAScope and video-assisted McIntosh laryngoscope for endotracheal
intubation in simulated difficult airway.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE- To compare intubation difficulty scale (IDS) score, rate of
successful intubation using TAScope and Indigenous MacIntosh videolaryngoscope in
simulated difficult airway
SECONDARY OBJECTIVE- To compare the time of intubation, CL grade, POGO score of
glottic view and hemodyamic parameters using TAScope and Indigenous MacIntosh
videolaryngoscope in simulated difficult airway.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 盲法
- Outcome Assessor Blinded
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18.00 Year(s) 至 60.00 Year(s)（—）
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •Adult patients aged between 18-60 years of either sex, belonging to American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II scheduled for elective surgery requiring general anaesthesia and intubation will be enrolled in the study.
排除标准
- •Patients having respiratory or pharyngeal pathology, restricted mouth opening, cervical spine injury, restricted cervical spine mobility, Rheumatoid Arthritis, anticipated difficult intubation, aspiration risk, pregnancy, BMI > 30kgm -2 will be excluded from the study.
结局指标
主要结局
To compare intubation difficulty scale (IDS) score, rate of
时间窗: Hemodynamic monitoring will be recorded immediately and later at 2,4,6,8 and 10 minutes
successful intubation using TAScope and Indigenous MacIntosh videolaryngoscope in
时间窗: Hemodynamic monitoring will be recorded immediately and later at 2,4,6,8 and 10 minutes
simulated difficult airway
时间窗: Hemodynamic monitoring will be recorded immediately and later at 2,4,6,8 and 10 minutes
次要结局
- To compare the time of intubation, CL grade, POGO score of(glottic view & hemodyamic parameters using TAScope & Indigenous MacIntosh)
研究者
Dr Shilpa Popli
Pt. BD Sharma PGIMS Rohtak, Haryana