Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01843153
NCT01843153
Completed
Phase 4

Continuous Versus Intermittent Sciatic Block Combined With a Continuous Femoral Block for Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty: a Prospective, Randomized Trial.

Kreiskrankenhaus Dormagen1 site in 1 country140 target enrollmentApril 2013

Overview

Phase
Phase 4
Intervention
Ropivacaine
Conditions
Total Knee Arthroplasty
Sponsor
Kreiskrankenhaus Dormagen
Enrollment
140
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
pain score (VRS)
Status
Completed
Last Updated
11 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The role of a sciatic block in addition to a femoral block remains controversial. The study addresses this topic by comparing a continuous block versus an injection on demand.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
April 2013
End Date
December 2014
Last Updated
11 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
Kreiskrankenhaus Dormagen
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients scheduled for total knee arthroplasty

Exclusion Criteria

  • failure to establish femoral and sciatic block
  • insufficient analgesic effect of the block
  • patient declines to participate

Arms & Interventions

intermittent

injection of ropivacaine on demand

Intervention: Ropivacaine

continuous

continuous ropivacaine infusion

Intervention: Ropivacaine

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

pain score (VRS)

Time Frame: 4 days

Secondary Outcomes

  • frequency of injections into the sciatic catheter(4 days)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials