One Week Aligner Evaluation
- Conditions
- Malocclusion
- Interventions
- Device: Invisalign
- Registration Number
- NCT02603289
- Lead Sponsor
- Align Technology, Inc.
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that changing aligners weekly provides similar results to changing aligners every two weeks.
- Detailed Description
The Invisalignยฎ System consists of a series of clear plastic aligners that are intended to replace conventional wire and bracket technology for many orthodontic cases. Each custom manufactured aligner exerts gentle, continuous forces to move teeth incrementally from their original state to a final, treated state. The aligners are designed to optimally move each tooth at a speed that follows physiologic principles. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that changing aligners weekly provides similar results to changing aligners every two weeks.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 287
- Subject must have fully erupted dentition except for 2nd and 3rd molars
- For Teen treatment group, subjects ages <17 years of age
- For Adult treatment group, subjects โฅ17 years of age
- Subject has undergone any accelerated orthodontic treatment prior to or during treatment as part of this study
- Subject with active caries
- Subject with periodontal disease
- Subject with TMD symptoms
- Subject has known allergy to latex or plastic
- Subjects who are pregnant or will become pregnant during treatment
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Adult with Primer Aligners Invisalign 17 years of age or older This group will get Primer Aligners Adult Invisalign 17 years of age or older Teen Invisalign \< 17 years of age
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Planned to Final Tooth Position Through study completion, an average of 2 years Test vs Historical Control Group
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Treatment time Through study completion, an average of 2 years Length of treatment
Subject Quality of Life Through study completion, an average of 2 years Assessment of QoL
Trial Locations
- Locations (24)
Dr. Sean Holliday
๐บ๐ธPearl City, Hawaii, United States
Dr. Mark Perelmuter
๐บ๐ธLouisville, Kentucky, United States
Dr. Ryan Caudill
๐บ๐ธMerritt Island, Florida, United States
Dr. Zvi Kennet
๐บ๐ธMacomb, Michigan, United States
Dr. Anil Idiculla
๐บ๐ธLone Tree, Colorado, United States
Dr. William Gierie
๐บ๐ธWilmington, North Carolina, United States
Dr. Clark Colville
๐บ๐ธSeguin, Texas, United States
Dr. Thomas Marcel
๐บ๐ธLivermore, California, United States
Dr. David Chenin
๐บ๐ธHenderson, Nevada, United States
Dr. Carlyn Phucas
๐บ๐ธMarlton, New Jersey, United States
Dr. Bart Iwasiuk
๐จ๐ฆBrampton, Ontario, Canada
Dr. Brian Amy
๐บ๐ธOklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
Dr. Robery Van den Berg
๐บ๐ธSan Ramon, California, United States
Dr. Mary Cooke
๐บ๐ธNapa, California, United States
Align Technology, Inc.
๐บ๐ธSan Jose, California, United States
Dr. Jeff Mastroianni
๐บ๐ธGlen Carbon, Illinois, United States
Dr. James Crouse
๐บ๐ธSalisbury, Maryland, United States
Dr. Thomas Everett
๐บ๐ธBurnsville, Minnesota, United States
Dr. Justin Wild
๐บ๐ธEden Prairie, Minnesota, United States
Dr. William Kottemann
๐บ๐ธMaple Grove, Minnesota, United States
Dr. Regina Blevins
๐บ๐ธInver Grove Heights, Minnesota, United States
Dr. Bella Shen Garnett
๐บ๐ธSan Francisco, California, United States
Dr. Vincent D'Ascoli
๐บ๐ธCarson City, Nevada, United States
Dr. David Paquette
๐บ๐ธMooresville, North Carolina, United States