Immunogenicity of Twice-annual Vaccination Against Seasonal Influenza for Two Hemispheres in Older Adults in Hong Kong - a Randomised Controlled Trial
Overview
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Influenza, Human
- Sponsor
- The University of Hong Kong
- Enrollment
- 400
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Difference in antibody titres
- Status
- Active, not recruiting
- Last Updated
- 2 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
This study evaluates the immunogenicity of adding inactivated influenza vaccine with southern hemisphere (SH) formulation to standard once-annual influenza vaccination with northern hemisphere (NH) formulation in older adults in Hong Kong over 9 years. Half of participants will receive twice-annual influenza vaccination with NH and SH formulation, while the other half will receive once-annual influenza vaccination with NH formulation and a placebo.
Detailed Description
Background: Hong Kong is located in subtropical regions with two seasonal peaks of influenza transmission. North Hemisphere seasonal influenza vaccine is usually available for vaccination by general public starting in October every year before the anticipated winter peak starting in December in Hong Kong, and it presumably also provides protection against the same prevailing strains during summer peak starting around July of the next year. However, influenza vaccines may have poorer efficacy and effectiveness in older adults. The investigators hypothesize that in a subtropical or tropical location with prolonged circulation of influenza viruses, including the emergence of new strains at different times of the year, twice-annual vaccination with the latest available strains could provide the best protection. Aim: To test the immune profiles over time of older adults following twice-annual influenza vaccination against those receiving once-annual influenza vaccination. Design and subjects: An immunogenicity study with a randomized placebo-controlled design among 400 older adults aged 70-79 years. The investigators will enroll participants from the general community who attend general outpatient clinics for influenza vaccination or medical or preventive care visits. Eligible individuals will be randomly allocated in equal proportions to two intervention groups (I: once-annual standard inactivated influenza vaccine; II: twice-annual standard inactivated influenza vaccine) consisting of ten rounds of vaccination as designated by the intervention group before each winter/summer influenza season and followed throughout the 5 years. \*In August 2021 we extended the study for a further 4 years (9 years in total) through to August 2025, with the same study design.\* Before each summer influenza season those in group II will receive the inactivated influenza vaccine with the southern hemisphere formulation and the other group will receive saline placebo. For each round of vaccination (or placebo), blood samples for immunological tests will be collected before administration and 30 days after administration among all participants, and at 7, 30 and 91 days after administration in a subset of 25% of the participants. Acute illnesses among participants will be monitored by active surveillance during influenza seasons. The vaccine formulations in each round of vaccination will be updated for each season according to WHO recommendations. Main outcome measures: Antibody titres measured by haemagglutination-inhibition assays, which is an established correlate of protection, in addition to other measurements on humoral and cell-mediated immune responses in the two intervention groups each round.
Investigators
Dr. Benjamin John Cowling
Professor
The University of Hong Kong
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Adult aged 70-79 years attending GOPCs, DECCs or day care centres for receiving influenza vaccination or medical or preventive care visits.
Exclusion Criteria
- •Individuals who show signs of dementia (either confirmed by medical records or do not pass the Mini-cog test) or significant cognitive impairment and are not competent to give their consent.
- •Individuals who report medical conditions not suitable to receive inactivated influenza vaccines, such as:
- •Severe allergic reaction (e.g., anaphylaxis) after previous dose of any influenza vaccine; or to a vaccine component, including egg protein;
- •Moderate or severe acute illness with or without fever after any previous influenza vaccination; or
- •A history of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) within 6 weeks of previous influenza vaccination.
- •Individuals, according to medical record, who report medical conditions not suitable to receive intramuscular injection, such as:
- •bleeding disorders
- •habitually taking anticoagulants (with the exception of antiplatelets such as aspirin).
- •Individuals who have any medical conditions not suitable to receive inactivated influenza vaccines as determined by a clinician.
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Difference in antibody titres
Time Frame: 30 and 182 days after each vaccination
The difference in antibody titres of participants measured by haemagglutination-inhibition (HAI) assay, evaluated by (1) the proportion of participants who achieve a target rise in antibody titre against each of the vaccine strains at 30 days, and (2) the geometric mean titre (GMT) ratios between the two groups against each of the vaccine strains at 30 days and 182 days. (The targeted rise in antibody titre is defined as the percentage of subjects with either a pre-vaccination HAI titre \<10 and a post-vaccination HAI titre ≥40, or a pre-vaccination HAI titre ≥10 and a minimum four-fold rise in post-vaccination HAI antibody titre.)
Secondary Outcomes
- PCR confirmed infection(182 days after each vaccination)
- CMI responses(7 days after each vaccination)
- Adverse events(30 days after each vaccination)
- Seroprotection(30 days after each vaccination)