Factors Affecting Post-treatment Outcomes in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- Conditions
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- Interventions
- Device: Radiofrequency ablationDrug: Trance-arterial chemoembolizationProcedure: Liver resectionCombination Product: Combined radiofrequency ablation + percutaneous ethanol injectionDrug: Systemic chemotherapyDietary Supplement: ViscumDrug: Symptomatic treatment
- Registration Number
- NCT04553458
- Lead Sponsor
- Sohag University
- Brief Summary
EASL and mRECIST criteria differ from each other in terms of the number of target lesions (all versus \< = 2) and calculation method (bidimensional versus unidimensional). Therefore, the investigators aimed to retrospectively analyze and compare the clinical outcomes among patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who were treated with different modalities of therapy according to the BCLC classification, and detect the possible predictors of post-treatment outcomes.
- Detailed Description
Background:
EASL and mRECIST criteria differ from each other in terms of the number of target lesions (all versus \< = 2) and calculation method (bidimensional versus unidimensional). Therefore, the investigators aimed to retrospectively analyze and compare the clinical outcomes among patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who were treated with different modalities of therapy according to the BCLC classification, and detect the possible predictors of post-treatment outcomes.
Methods:
This work was conducted at the departments of tropical medicine and gastroenterology, internal medicine, and general surgery. This study included patients that matched our eligibility criteria for a period of five years started from June 2015 to May 2020. The study purpose was to retrospectively analyze the clinical outcomes among patients with HCC who were treated with different modalities of therapy according to the BCLC classification, and detect the possible predictors of post-treatment favorable outcomes. The data of the patients were extracted and retrospectively reviewed from the patients' records and the databases of both hospitals (SUH and SOI).
During the period of recruitment, 407 patients diagnosed with HCC admitted to our departments and followed-up attending outpatient clinics, Sohag University Hospitals, over a 5 years period.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 407
- Adult patients
- with hepatocellular carcinoma
- severely-ill patients
- With other system comorbidities,
- presence of extrahepatic metastasis,
- patients who dropped from the follow-up list after treatment.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Unfavorable outcome Percutaneous ethanol injection Progressive (deteriorate/Recurrence) or Death Favorable outcome Radiofrequency ablation Cure or stable disease Favorable outcome Trance-arterial chemoembolization Cure or stable disease Favorable outcome Liver resection Cure or stable disease Favorable outcome Percutaneous ethanol injection Cure or stable disease Unfavorable outcome Systemic chemotherapy Progressive (deteriorate/Recurrence) or Death Favorable outcome Combined radiofrequency ablation + percutaneous ethanol injection Cure or stable disease Unfavorable outcome Radiofrequency ablation Progressive (deteriorate/Recurrence) or Death Unfavorable outcome Combined radiofrequency ablation + percutaneous ethanol injection Progressive (deteriorate/Recurrence) or Death Unfavorable outcome Viscum Progressive (deteriorate/Recurrence) or Death Unfavorable outcome Symptomatic treatment Progressive (deteriorate/Recurrence) or Death Unfavorable outcome Trance-arterial chemoembolization Progressive (deteriorate/Recurrence) or Death Unfavorable outcome Sorafenib Progressive (deteriorate/Recurrence) or Death
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method CURE (Number of patients cured completely from the disease) one-year the HCC is treated (disappearance of all lesions)
STABLE Disease (Number of patients with neither progression nor cure from the disease) one-year NONE of the other outcomes' criteria
PROGRESSIVE((Number of patients with progression of the disease) (measured by follow-up CT scans, increase in size, appearance of new intratumoral lesions, or appearance of new lesions one-year increase in size - appearance of new intratumoral lesions - new lesions
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method DEATH (Number of patients died from the disease) one-year Mortality rate