Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01798472
NCT01798472
Unknown
Phase 2

Cemented Versus Uncemented Arthroplasty in Elderly Patients With Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Stockholm South General Hospital1 site in 1 country140 target enrollmentNovember 2009

Overview

Phase
Phase 2
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Femoral Neck Fractures
Sponsor
Stockholm South General Hospital
Enrollment
140
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Harris Hip Score
Last Updated
11 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to compare the functional and radiological outcome after displaced, femoral neck fractures treated with either cemented or uncemented arthroplasties.

The primary hypothesis is that the uncemented arthroplasty shows the same functional outcome at 12 month as the cemented arthroplasty.

Detailed Description

Femoral neck fracture is a common cause of suffering and premature mortality among the elderly. Riskfactors for femoral neck fractures are age, gender, osteoporosis and cognitive dysfunction. Mortality and morbidity varies between undisplaced and displaced femoral neck fractures. Different treatment options are available: reduction and internal fixation vs joint replacement (arthroplasty). The treatment of undisplaced femoral neck fractures is uncontroversial and consists of internal fixation with screws. The treatment of displaced, femoral neck fractures with internal fixation shows unacceptable results with complications rates leading to reoperation between 40-60%. Treatment of these fractures with arthroplasties has therefore become the standard treatment in industrial countries. Fixation of the femoral component with bone-cement is standard procedure in Europe today. To avoid negative cardio-pulmonary events in patients with serious comorbidities and in very old and frail patients uncemented femoral components or internal fixation are used. These uncemented stems are mostly older design with poor track records. The use of modern, well-documented stems used in an osteoarthritis population for fracture patients has still to be tested.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
November 2009
End Date
November 2018
Last Updated
11 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
Stockholm South General Hospital
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Christian Inngul

Consultant orthopeadic surgery

Stockholm South General Hospital

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • displaced fracture of the femoral neck
  • independent living
  • independent ambulation (with or without walking aids)

Exclusion Criteria

  • pathological fracture
  • severe dementia (defined as ≤3 in short portable mental questionnaire) preoperatively
  • preexisting ipsilateral hip disease
  • neurological disease (e.g. M. Parkinson)
  • psychiatric disease which makes understanding or following instructions impossible
  • history of drug and alcohol abuse

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Harris Hip Score

Time Frame: 12 month

Our primary outcome variable is the Harris Hip Score at 12 month follow up. Harris Hip Score is an investigator reported tool evaluating hip function in four dimensions: Pain, function, absence of deformity and range of motion

Secondary Outcomes

  • Health related quality of life(12 month)
  • Radiological follow up(12 month)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials