Maxillary Canine Retraction Assisted With Micro-osteoperforations Versus Injectable Platelet Rich Fibrin
- Conditions
- Effects of; Movement of Teeth Assiste Wit MOPS and I-prf
- Interventions
- Combination Product: injectable platelet rich fibrin versus microosteoperforation
- Registration Number
- NCT05960825
- Lead Sponsor
- Al-Azhar University
- Brief Summary
The present clinical comparative study will be undertaken for assessment of two different modalities of maxillary canine retraction assisted with microosteoperforations versus injectable platelet rich fibrin.
- Detailed Description
Group I: will include 9 patients who willreceive MOPs with maxillary canine retraction that will be performed on intervention sides according to a standardized protocol.
▪ Group II: will include 9 patients receive i-PRF that will be performed on intervention sides according to a standardized protocol.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 18
- An age ranges from 15-22 years.
- Severe crowding or protrusion requiring 1st premolars extractions followed by symmetrical canine retraction.
- All permanent teeth present, 3rd molars are excluded.
- Good oral and general health.
- No systemic disease/medication that could interfere with OTM.
- No previous orthodontic treatment.
- Patient diagnosed to have an indication for non-extraction approach.
- Poor oral hygiene or periodontally compromised patient.
- Patient with craniofacial anomalies or previous history of trauma, bruxism or parafunctions.
- Previous orthodontic treatment.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- FACTORIAL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Group MOPs injectable platelet rich fibrin versus microosteoperforation Group MOPs : will include 9 patients who willreceive MOPs with maxillary canine retraction that will be performed on intervention sides according to a standardized protocol. Group i-PRF injectable platelet rich fibrin versus microosteoperforation group i-PRF: will include 9 patients receive i-PRF that will be performed on intervention sides according to a standardized protocol
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Direct clinical assessment of the amount of maxillary canine retraction i.e. amount of extraction space closure before and after four months observation period and on every 28 days observation period according to standardized method 4months Direct clinical assessment of the amount of maxillary canine retraction i.e. amount of extraction space closure before and after four months observation and every 28 days period and on every 28 days observation period according to standardized method. 2. Study cast assessment:
• The amount of maxillary canine retraction on both sides will be measured immediately before starting canine retraction and at each observation interval by using a software for the scanned models according to standardized method
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
AlAzhar university
🇪🇬Cairo, Egypt