Evaluation of Two Protocol of Maxillary Protraction in Class III Adolescent After Using (MSE)
Not Applicable
Active, not recruiting
- Conditions
- Maxillary Protraction in Class III Adolescent After Using (MSE)
- Interventions
- Device: Maxillary skeletal expander with protraction face mask with conventional protocolDevice: Maxillary skeletal expander with protraction face mask with Alt-RAMEC protocol.
- Registration Number
- NCT05489302
- Lead Sponsor
- Al-Azhar University
- Brief Summary
The aim of this study of this study is to compare two protocol of maxillary protraction in class III adolescent after using (MSE) Alt-RAMEC vs conventional rapid palatal expansion using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 42
Inclusion Criteria
- Class3 Patients suffering maxillary collapse with a skeletal background
- Patients with retrognathic maxilla.
- Patients with anterior cross-bite or incisor end-to-end relationship
- Patients with unilateral or bilateral posterior crossbite.
- Patients with no periodontal disease.
- Patients with good oral hygiene and general health.
- No systemic diseases that may affect bone quality or interfere with orthodontic treatment.
- Patients with no previous orthodontic treatment.
Exclusion Criteria
- previous orthodontic treatment.
- Craniofacial syndrome.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description (MSE) conventional protocol Maxillary skeletal expander with protraction face mask with conventional protocol - (MSE) Alt-RAMEC protocol Maxillary skeletal expander with protraction face mask with Alt-RAMEC protocol. -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method amount of maxillary protraction 6 months protraction of maxilla using CBCT
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Mohamed Shendy
🇪🇬Cairo, Nasr City, Egypt