MedPath

Glass Ionomer Sealant Versus Fluoride Varnish on Occlusal Caries Prevention

Not Applicable
Conditions
Tooth, Deciduous
Glass Ionomer Cements
Child
Pit and Fissure Caries
Interventions
Procedure: 5% sodium fluoride varnish (NaF)
Procedure: Glass ionomer sealant (GIS)
Registration Number
NCT04163354
Lead Sponsor
The University of Hong Kong
Brief Summary

The current study compares the efficacy of glass ionomer fissure sealant versus topical application of 5% sodium fluoride varnish in prevention of occlusal caries among preschool children.

Detailed Description

Topical fluoride varnish (TFV) with 5% sodium fluoride in its content has proven effective in preventing caries among children and adolescents. Its reduction in DMFT is well supported by Cochrane reviews and clinical trials. However, its effect in preventing pit and fissure caries in primary dentition has not been assessed.

Pit and fissure sealants have been a recommended procedure in preventing caries development in permanent molars. Multiple systematic reviews and clinical trials have concluded that fissure sealants are significantly more effective than topical fluoride varnishes in preventing occlusal caries in permanent molars. However, a recent Cochrane review suggested that there was still insufficient evidence to determine superiority of resin or glass ionomer fissure sealants over topical fluoride varnishes for occlusal caries prevention, due to the lack of reliable results and low quality of evidence.

Also, most studies were conducted on permanent first molars among school children, whom cooperation and moisture control can be easily achieved. However, application of fissure sealants, especially resin-based sealant, in very young children can be a technique-sensitive procedure. Compared with a mean treatment time of less than 3 minutes for varnish application, application of resin-based sealants required over 15 minutes. Moisture control is also of paramount importance for the retention and success of resin-based sealants, which may be difficult among young preschool children.

Glass-ionomer sealants can chemically bond to enamel and are more tolerable to inadequate moisture control. As its application requires less clinical steps, glass-ionomer sealant is comparatively more acceptable to younger patients and can be used in outreach settings with a large number of participants. The fluoride releasing ability is also beneficial in preventing caries especially at adjacent tooth surfaces. However, its retention rate is significantly lower than that of resin-based sealants, its success rate in preventing fissure caries in very young patients is still unknown.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
348
Inclusion Criteria

Generally healthy children aged between 3-5 years with no remarkable medical history.

Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  1. Children with the presence of caries of ICDAS code 3, 4, 5, or 6 on other primary teeth.
  2. Children who had received professional fluoride application in the past 6 months.
  3. Children with serious systemic disease or taking long term medication.
  4. Children who are uncooperative or refuse the treatment.
  5. Second primary molars that are (i) with caries in dentin indicated by ICDAS code 4, 5 or 6; (ii) partially erupted; (iii) with fillings and/or sealants; and (iv) hypoplastic or hypomineralized.
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
NaF varnish5% sodium fluoride varnish (NaF)Application of a 5% NaF varnish (Duraphat, Colgate-Palmolive Ltd, Waltrop, Germany) on the occlusal surfaces of primary second molars and all other teeth, every 3 months during the study period;
GI sealantGlass ionomer sealant (GIS)Glass ionomer sealant (GC Fuji VII® (pink)) on all primary second molars included in the studies, with no further repair/replacement of the sealant
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Caries increment24 months

Carious cavity development into dentin (ICDAS code 4, 5 and 6) on the occlusal surfaces of primary second molars over time.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Sealant retention24 months

Retention of GIS on included primary second molar

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

The University of Hong Kong

🇭🇰

Hong Kong, Hong Kong

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath