nderstanding the curriculum, teaching-learning methods, preclinical medical students attitude about faculty using the DREEM Questionnaire
Not Applicable
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2019/08/020547
- Lead Sponsor
- Ganesh Kamath M
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
First and second year MBBS students of Melaka Manipal Medical College (MMMC), Manipal.
Exclusion Criteria
MMMC students who do not wish to participate in this study and MMMC students who are in refreshers/ repeaters batch.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Observational
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method The responses from students about the educational environment (using DREEM questionnaire), we can understand whether curriculum changes are requiredTimepoint: 0 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree).an average score of 3 and above will be considered as positive and responses with an average score of 2 and lower will be considered as areas which are problematic and need immediate action. An average score between 2 and 3 would be considered as parts of the learning environment that could be improved.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method This will help in accessing whether changes in teaching and learning method need to be changed and what social and academic reform are neededTimepoint: 0 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree).an average score of 3 and above will be considered as positive and responses with an average score of 2 and lower will be considered as areas which are problematic and need immediate action. An average score between 2 and 3 would be considered as parts of the learning environment that could be improved.