Comparison of the Cognitive, Dual-task and Physical Effects of 6 Programs With Older Adults
- Conditions
- Cognitive FunctionPhysical Fitness
- Interventions
- Other: Video games + bikeOther: Complex Cognitive and Motor Activities programOther: BikeOther: Immersive and Interactive Wall ExergamesOther: exergames programOther: video games program
- Registration Number
- NCT05991011
- Lead Sponsor
- Alexandra Perrot
- Brief Summary
While the association of physical and/or motor and/or cognitive components with training can generate synergistic effects and thus create an efficient cognitive enrichment program, very few studies have focused on finding an optimal combined program for older adults. According to the model of Herold and his colleagues, there are two modalities of simultaneous combined training: Thinking While Moving (TwM), when the additional cognitive task is not linked to the motor task, and Moving While Thinking (MwT), when the cognitive task is integrated into the motor task. They assume the latter approach is the most promising for improving cognitive reserve. Nevertheless, to the investigators' knowledge, only one study has compared these two modalities in older adults and none has broadened the question by comparing several MwT trainings.
The goal of this interventional study will be to compare the cognitive, dual-task, and physical effects of 6 physical and/or cognitive programs in healthy but inactive older adults. The main questions it will aims to answer are:
* Will the Moving While Thinking and Thinking While Moving programs have the same effects?
* If they have different effects, which will be the best way to improve cognitive, dual-task, and physical functions? The study is being set up between 2023 and 2025 to compare the cognitive, dual- ask and physical effects of 6 programs (3 months, 2 sessions of 1 hour per week). Three experimental MwT programs will be studied: Immersive and interactive wall exergames (I2WE), Complex Cognitive and Motor Activities (2CMA), and exergames with Switch (EXER). They will be compared to an experimental TwM program of stationary bike simultaneous to the Switch (Video games + bike) and 2 control programs: inactive video games (VG) and stationary bike (BIKE). A control group (CON) will be also created.
Cognitive, dual-task, and physical pre-tests (before the program), post-tests (after the program), and retention tests (3 months after the end of the program) will be realized to evaluate the effects of the programs.
- Detailed Description
All subjects must give their informed consent for inclusion before they participate in the study. The study will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and the protocol has been approved by the University Paris Saclay Ethics Committee of Research (N°462) who stated that a Protection of Persons Committee was not necessary. The sample size calculation was performed using G. Power. The investigators calculated a sample size sufficient to detect small effect sizes (η2 = .04). Therefore, f = 0.20, α = 0.05, p = 0.95, power = 0.95, were chosen to favor clinically significant effect sizes. To test the main hypotheses of the present study, 133 participants are required. To compensate for possible dropouts, 35 more participants will be included. The 7 groups will be composed of 24 participants each, for a total of 168 participants.
The training interventions will be carried out in different places and at different times:
* Montreuil for I2WE and 2CMA (February to May 2023)
* Créteil for EXER (September to December 2023)
* Paris for BIKE and VG-BIKE (February to May 2024)
* Orsay for VG (September to December 2023). Pre- and post-tests will be carried out before and after the training period to evaluate the cognitive, DT, and physical benefits of each program, and retention tests 3 months after the end of the program.
Statistical analysis plan: Data will be analyzed with JASP software. The statistical analysis will allow us to determine the effects of the 7 different groups on the cognitive, DT, and physical functions. The analysis will include only subjects who completed all the pre- and post-tests. Data from the pre-tests, post-tests, and retention tests will be presented using descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation) to describe the participants' characteristics and performances on assessments. Before performing the inferential statistical tests, all relevant hypotheses will be tested, and if they are met, statistical analysis will be conducted. For primary and secondary measures, repeated ANOVA will be used to test the interaction between pre-test, post-test, retention test x training groups. If a significant interaction is found, a Bonferroni post-hoc test will be performed. Effects sizes will be calculated to study the power of the results.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 168
- be over 60 years old
- have a MMSE score above 27
- engage in less than 2.5 hours of physical activity per week assessed by the QAPPA
- score 3 or higher on a subjective health Likert-scale (1= very poor to 5= very good)
- be retired
- have no major pathology
- have normal or corrected vision and hearing
- have no difficulty bending or using their shoulders
- do not frequently play video games or exergames
- present a medical certificate not contraindicating physical activity).
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description VG-bike (Video games + bike) Video games + bike - 2CMA (Complex Cognitive and Motor Activities) Complex Cognitive and Motor Activities program - BIKE (bike) Bike - I2WE (Immersive and interactive wall exergames) Immersive and Interactive Wall Exergames - EXER exergames program - VG (video games) video games program -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change Inhibition with witty Within 1 week before the program, within 1 week after the program, and 3 months after the end of the program. It will be performed with a set of eight semaphores which are equipped with a LED matrix. The participant will be standing, facing a specially designed rack with semaphores. They will have to turn off as fast as possible the lights that appear, according to the instructions given, and will have to move back their hand to the middle of their hips. The tests consist of 20 trials, each trial starts 1500ms after the previous response. The total time to complete the tests will be recorded in milliseconds. In part A, the participant will have to turn off the semaphores that were randomly lit up red. The others remained unenlightened. In part B, the participant will have to turn off the semaphores that were randomly lit up with the green letter O. The others lit up with other colors associated with a letter. In part C, the participant will have to turn off the semaphores randomly lit up with the green letter O. The others lit up in green are associated with another letter.
Change cognitive-cognitive Dual task Within 1 week before the program, within 1 week after the program, and 3 months after the end of the program. To evaluate the cognitive-cognitive Dual Task capacity, the cognitive tasks will be first realized separately as a single task, and then concomitantly. For the Sound counting task, the participant will have to count in their mind the number of high-pitched sounds among low-pitched sounds that they heard, for 2 minutes. At the end of the 2 minutes, the participant will have to give the number of high-pitched sounds counted. The percentage between the number given by the participant and the correct number will be calculated. For the Go no Go Test, the participant will have to press a key as quickly as possible when they see the "X" symbol and not press when they see the "+" symbol, for 2 minutes. The reaction time, the number of correct answers, and errors will be recorded.
Change physical-cognitive Dual Task Within 1 week before the program, within 1 week after the program, and 3 months after the end of the program. To evaluate the physical-cognitive Dual Task capacity, the cognitive and the physical task will be first realized separately as a single task, and then concomitantly. For the Operation counting task, the participant will subtract 7 from a starting number (e.g., 286) as many times as possible for one minute. The number of correct answers, as well as errors, will be recorded. For the STEP test, the participant will do as many repetitions as possible, going up and down a step, one foot after the other, for 2 minutes.
Change Visuospatial memory Within 1 week before the program, within 1 week after the program, and 3 months after the end of the program. Visuospatial memory will be evaluated with the Spatial Span Test, a subtest of the Weschler Memory Scale. In the first part, the participant reproduces in the same order a sequence of cubes designated by the examiner. In the second, the participant reproduces a sequence of movements in reverse order. The number of cubes increases progressively and determines the spatial span and the backward spatial span. For each level, the participant always performs 2 trials and scores 1 point for each successful trial. The test ends when 2 errors are made at the same level.
Change Flexibility Within 1 week before the program, within 1 week after the program, and 3 months after the end of the program. Flexibility will be evaluated with the Trail Making Test. Part A consists in linking a series of increasing numbers from 1 to 25 by selecting the appropriate number. In part B, the participants connect 2 series of symbols in alternation: 1 of numbers and 1 of letters. This has to be done without lifting the pen from the paper and as quickly as possible. If mistakes are made, the examiner informs the participant, who has to correct them. Flexibility is highlighted specifically by analyzing the time difference in the result B-A, a purer measure of flexibility.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Lower body flexibility change Within 1 week before the program, within 1 week after the program, and 3 months after the end of the program. Lower body flexibility will be evaluated with the Chair-sit-and-reach test. Sitting on the edge of a chair, one leg straight, the other bent, the participant will have to bring their hand as close as possible to the foot of the straight leg. The number of centimeters between the hand and the foot will be measured. The values are negative if the fingers of the hand extended beyond the toes.
Upper body strength 2 change Within 1 week before the program, within 1 week after the program, and 3 months after the end of the program. Upper body strength will be also evaluated with the Seated Medicine Ball Throw test. Sitting in a chair, back against the back of the chair, feet flat on the floor, the subject will have to throw a 3kg medicine ball as far as possible with both hands, starting from the chest. The distance between the subject and the medicine ball will be recorded.
Upper body strength change Within 1 week before the program, within 1 week after the program, and 3 months after the end of the program. Upper body strength will be evaluated with the Handgrip test. The participant will have to squeeze a dynamometer with maximum isometric effort, which has to be maintained for about 5 seconds. The force created, measured in kilograms, will be recorded for both arms.
Dynamical balance change Within 1 week before the program, within 1 week after the program, and 3 months after the end of the program. The dynamical balance will be evaluated with the TUG test. The participant will have to get up from a chair, walk around a block located in front of them, 3 meters away, and sit down again as quickly as possible. The time to complete this course will be recorded.
Upper body flexibility change Within 1 week before the program, within 1 week after the program, and 3 months after the end of the program. Upper body flexibility will be evaluated with the Back-scratch test. The participant will have to bring their two hands as close together as possible (one hand reaching over the shoulder, palm against the back, the other reaching to the middle of the back, back of the hand against the back). The number of centimeters between both hands will be measured. The values are negative if the fingers of the two hands crossed.
Endurance change Within 1 week before the program, within 1 week after the program, and 3 months after the end of the program. Endurance will be evaluated with the 6-min walking test. The participant will have to walk as far as possible, in 30-meter round trips, for 6 minutes. The distance will be recorded, as well as the heart rate to determine the intensity of the effort.
Coordination change Within 1 week before the program, within 1 week after the program, and 3 months after the end of the program. Coordination will be evaluated with the Rhythm Ladder test. The participant will have to cross as quickly as possible, and with as few mistakes as possible, a 3-meter rhythmic ladder placed on the ground. To cross the ladder, they will have to respect a sequence of foot movements: put two feet consecutively in the first square, then two feet consecutively on both sides of the same square, then put two feet in the next square, then outside, and so on. The time to complete the test and the number of errors will be recorded.
Trial Locations
- Locations (3)
Centre Sportif Arthur Ashe
🇫🇷Montreuil, France
Club seniors Kennedy
🇫🇷Créteil, France
UFR STAPS Paris Cité
🇫🇷Paris, France