跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04496648
NCT04496648Unknown不适用

The Danish Randomized Sham-Controlled Study of Invasive Versus Medical Treatment for Stable Angina Pectoris

Herlev and Gentofte Hospital2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 450 人开始时间: 2020年6月15日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
入组人数
450
试验地点
2
主要终点
Combined endpoint of strategy success

研究概览

简要总结

Patients with ischemic heart disease and symptoms due to lack of oxygen to the heart on exertion (stable angina pectoris) are usually treated by either percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or optimal medical therapy (OMT) alone. In patients with mild to moderate coronary artery disease the prognostic impact of PCI is probably limited. Furthermore it is unclear which treatment is superior in terms of relieving symptoms (PCI or OMT). In this trial, patients with mild to moderate coronary artery disease will be randomized to PCI or sham-PCI. All patients will undergo optimal medical therapy. It is hypothesized that PCI is superior to sham-PCI in patients with stable angina pectoris undergoing optimal medical therapy in terms of symptom-relief.

详细描述

Ischemic heart disease (IHD) is a major cause of death and disability worldwide. Patients with ischemic heart disease and symptoms due to lack of oxygen to the heart on exertion (stable angina pectoris) are usually treated by either percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or optimal medical therapy (OMT) alone. In patients with mild to moderate coronary artery disease the prognostic impact of PCI is probably limited. Furthermore it is unclear which treatment is superior in terms of relieving symptoms (PCI or OMT). Both treatments are effective in terms of reducing symptoms, but come with potential side effects.

PCI has in previous trials failed to show superiority compared to medical therapy in patients with stable angina pectoris. However, many visually significant lesions do not limit the blood flow significantly to the heart, and stenting such a lesion only exposes the patient to the risk of side effects of intervention. In recent years it has therefore become guideline-recommended practice to perform physiological test to evaluate a potential stenosis. During an angiography this is most often done using fractional flow reserve (FFR).

This study tests the optimal strategy for treatment of angina-symptoms in patients with stable pectoris. PCI is performed with modern stent designs and use of intravascular functional testing (FFR-guided PCI) and compared to sham-PCI.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Prevention
盲法
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 85 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • 未提供

排除标准

  • 未提供

结局指标

主要结局

Combined endpoint of strategy success

时间窗: 3 months

Number of patients without angina (freedom from angina) and without hospital admission for intolerable stable angina pectoris, unstable angina pectoris, or acute myocardial infarction

次要结局

  • Number of conversions to PCI for procedural complication (sham-PCI group)(3 months)
  • Number of patients with hospital admission for intolerable stable angina, unstable angina pectoris, or acute myocardial infarction(3 months)
  • Number of patients in CCS class 1, 2, and 3, respectively, without hospital admission for intolerable stable angina, unstable angina pectoris, or acute myocardial infarction(3 months)
  • Number of patients with clinically driven coronary revascularization(3 months)
  • Change in CCS class(3 months)
  • Use of antianginal agents(3 months)
  • Quality of life score(3 months)
  • Number of all-cause death, any myocardial infarction, stroke, major bleeding, and severe drug reaction(3 months)
  • Change in angina-specific quality of life(3 months)
  • Primary composite endpoint in the modified intention-to-treat population(3 months)
  • Change in CCS class in the modified intention-to-treat population(3 months)
  • Change in Seattle Angina Questionnaire 7 score in the modified intention-to-treat population(3 months)
  • Change in generic quality of life (EQ-5D-5L) in the modified intention-to-treat population(3 months)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Sune Ammentorp Haahr-Pedersen

Primary Investigator

Herlev and Gentofte Hospital

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验