Laparoscopic Ventral Mesh Rectopexy Versus Delorme's Operation in Management of Complete Rectal Prolapse
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Status
- Completed
- Sponsor
- Mansoura University
- Enrollment
- 50
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Recurrence of the condition
Study Overview
Brief Summary
A comparative randomized study between laparoscopic ventral mesh Rectopexy and Delorme's procedure in treatment of complete rectal prolapse to ass both efficacy and complications
Detailed Description
A comparative randomized study between laparoscopic ventral mesh Rectopexy and Delorme's procedure in treatment of complete rectal prolapse to ass both efficacy and complications.
Follow up is scheduled for 18 months to evaluate recurrence, continence state and complications
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Intervention Model
- Parallel
- Primary Purpose
- Treatment
- Masking
- None
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 16 Years to 70 Years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)
- Sex
- All
- Accepts Healthy Volunteers
- No
Inclusion Criteria
- •patients with complete rectal prolapse
Exclusion Criteria
- •patients who underwent previous surgery for complete rectal prolapse
- •patients unfit for surgery
- •patients with associated colorectal diseases or pathology
Arms & Interventions
Laparoscopic ventral mesh Rectopexy
Fixation of the rectum to the sacrum using laparoscopy and mesh
Intervention: Laparoscopic ventral mesh Rectopexy (Procedure)
delorme's procedure
excision of excess rectal mucosa under spinal anesthesia then plication of the rectal muscles with vicryl 2/0 sutures
Intervention: Delorme's procedure (Procedure)
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Recurrence of the condition
Time Frame: 18 month
Measured by counting the number of patients with recurrence of rectal prolapse
Secondary Outcomes
No secondary outcomes reported
Investigators
Sameh Emile
Lecturer of general surgery
Mansoura University