Association Between Genetic Variant Scores and DOACs (DARES2)

Completed

• Conditions: Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Iatrogenic Disorder

• Registration Number: NCT04597593
• Lead Sponsor: Cipherome, Inc.

Brief Summary

The study's objective is to evaluate the predictive accuracy of Cipherome's algorithm in predicting and preventing serious adverse drug reactions (ADRs) experienced by patients while on direct oral anti-coagulants (DOACs).

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Study First Submitted: 2020-10-02
• Study Start: 2020-10-07
• Study First Submitted QC: 2020-10-15
• Study First Posted: 2020-10-22
• Primary Completion: 2022-12-29
• Study Completion: 2022-12-30
• Status Verified: 2023-08
• Last Update Submitted: 2023-08-14
• Last Update Posted: 2023-08-16

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: COMPLETED
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 200

Inclusion Criteria

• Any adult patient 18 years and older, who experienced a serious adverse drug reaction while taking a DOAC and is able to provide informed consent.

Read More

Exclusion Criteria

• Failure to provide informed consent

Read More

Study & Design

• Study Type: OBSERVATIONAL
• Study Design: Not specified

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
To determine the predictive accuracy of Cipherome's Drug Safety Score (DSS) in correlating with serious Adverse Drug Reactions associated with Direct Oral Anti-coagulants (DOACs) (rivaroxaban, apixaban, dabigatran, and edoxaban).	Within 1 year of DOAC therapy initiation	The primary endpoint is to determine the accuracy of the DSS in predicting clinical outcomes of major bleeding per International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostatis (ISTH) criteria in subjects on Direct Oral Anti-coagulants (DOACs). The DSS is calculated on a scale of 0 to 1, with scores below 0.3 correlated with a higher risk of ADRs and scores above 0.7 correlated with a lower risk of ADRs. We will determine the DSS of all subjects who experienced major bleeding and compare it to the DSS of control subjects who did not experience bleeding.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
To evaluate the predictive accuracy of the DSS in correlating with serious ADRs compared to clinical tools (e.g., HAS BLED criteria).	Within 1 year of DOAC therapy initiation	The secondary endpoint is to determine the accuracy of the DSS predicting clinical outcomes compared to clinical tools such as the HAS-BLED scoring system. A subject with a HAS-BLED score of \> 4 points will be considered moderate-high risk of bleeding and a HAS-BLED score of 4 or less will be considered low risk. A DSS is calculated on a scale of 0 to 1, with scores below 0.3 correlated with a higher risk of ADRs and scores above 0.7 correlated with a lower risk of ADRs. Both DSS (low and high risk subjects) and HAS-BLED scores (low and high risk subjects) will be compared to actual clinical outcomes to assess the predictive accuracy of each scoring system.
To evaluate the predictive accuracy of the DSS in correlating with treatment failures while on Direct Oral Anti-coagulants (DOACs)	Within 1 year of DOAC therapy initiation	The secondary endpoint is to determine the accuracy of the DSS in predicting treatment failures (e.g., recurrent MI, systemic embolism, or ischemic stroke) as compared to clinical outcomes while on DOACs. The DSS is calculated on a scale of 0 to 1, with preliminary studies demonstrating that scores below 0.3 correlated with a higher risk of ADRs and scores above 0.7 correlated with a lower risk of ADRs.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

SNUBH; 🇰🇷 Seongnam-si, Gyonggi-do, Korea, Republic of