Guided Bone Regeneration Versus Bone Block Grafting
- Conditions
- Atrophy; Bone
- Interventions
- Procedure: Guided bone regenerationProcedure: Khoury technique
- Registration Number
- NCT05593198
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to analyze the volumetric gain and stability of the newly formed bone tissue comparing guided bone regeneration with block graft.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 44
- Patients in need of an implant-supported rehabilitation
- Patients requiring bone regeneration
- Healthy patients
- Full-mouth plaque score (FMPS) and full-mouth bleeding score (FMBS) ≤ 15%
- Sufficient mesiodistal and interocclusal space
- At least 6 months of follow-up
- An American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification ≥ III
- General contraindications for surgical treatment or implant placement
- Untreated periodontitis
- Smoking
- Excessive alcohol consumption
- Any drug or medication known to affect oral status and bone turnover or contraindicate surgical treatment
- No residual keratinized tissue at the experimental area
- Unwillingness to return for follow-up examinations
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Guided bone regeneration Guided bone regeneration Patients will be treated with guided bone regeneration. Bone block Khoury technique Patients will be treated with bone blocks using the Khoury technique.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Bone volume 6 Months follow up the bone volume will be analyzed with the Cone Beam Computed Tomography scan
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Periodontal parameters 6 Months follow up the periodontal parameters will be analyzed clinically with the periodontal probe and measured in millimeters. All the periodontal parameters will be combined to describe the periodontal status of the patient.
Histological analysis 6 Months follow up The histological analysis will be performed harvesting a sample during the implant placement. Bone biopsies including both native and regenerated bone will be subjected to digital scanning to analyze the characteristics of newly formed bone, the remaining grafted material, integration of grafted material with newly formed bone, soft tissue, and local inflammation. Histomorphometric analyses will be performed to measure the following parameters: bone tissue area , graft material area , soft tissue area. Bone tissue area , graft material area , soft tissue area will be expressed relative to the total area.
Wound healing 2 weeks follow up the wound healing will be recorded with the Early Wound Healing Score (EHS) ranging from 0 to 10 which includes the following parameters:
* clinical signs of re-epithelialization: 0 points, visible distance between incision margins; 3 points, incision margins in contact; 6 points, merged incision margins.
* clinical signs of haemostasis: 0 points, bleeding at the incision margins; 1 point, presence of fibrin at the incision margins; 2 points, absence of fibrin on the incision margins.
* clinical signs of inflammation: 0 points, redness involving \>50% of the incision length and/or pronounced swelling; 1 point, redness involving \<50% of the incision length; 2 points, absence of redness along the incision length.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli
🇮🇹Rome, Italy