CPR pillow v/s Mannequin- A comparison in teaching cardiopulmonary resuscitatio
Not Applicable
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2022/08/044919
- Lead Sponsor
- Abhinav Nehra
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
Healthy students pursuing undergraduate courses in a deemed-to-be University in coastal Karnataka.
Exclusion Criteria
1. Students with prior training in Cardiopulmonary resuscitation
2. Students not willing to participate in the study
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Percentage of participants performing correct technique of CPR (rate, depth, hand position) during assessment.Timepoint: At the end of the training session.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change in attitude and confidence towards performing CPR at the end of trainingTimepoint: At the end of the training session
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
How does the CPR pillow in CTRI/2022/08/044919 compare to mannequins in biomechanical accuracy of chest compressions?
What is the comparative effectiveness of CPR pillows versus mannequins in skill retention for hands-only CPR in CTRI/2022/08/044919?
Which physiological metrics predict successful CPR training outcomes with low-cost models like CTRI/2022/08/044919?
What adverse events are reported in CTRI/2022/08/044919 when using CPR pillows versus mannequins?
How do alternative low-cost CPR training devices in CTRI/2022/08/044919 compare to mannequins in resource-limited settings?