MedPath

Transfusion-requirements in Septic Shock Trial

Phase 3
Completed
Conditions
Septic Shock
Interventions
Biological: SAGM (Saline-Adenine-Glucose-Mannitol) blood transfusion
Registration Number
NCT01485315
Lead Sponsor
Scandinavian Critical Care Trials Group
Brief Summary

Patients with blood poisoning - sepsis - often receive blood transfusions in the intensive care unit. The evidence that blood transfusion leads to improved outcome is limited and the blood may be harmful to some of these patients. To bridge the gap between clinical practice and evidence, a large randomised clinical trial is needed to document the efficacy and safety of RBC transfusion in these very sick patients

Detailed Description

Background Septic patients often receive red blood cell (RBC) transfusions in the intensive care unit. The evidence that RBC transfusion leads to improved outcome is limited and the intervention may be harmful to some of these patients. In contrast, current guidelines recommend restrictive transfusion of RBC for critical ill patients without septic shock. To bridge the gap between clinical practice and evidence, a large randomised clinical trial is needed to document the efficacy and safety of RBC transfusion in patients with septic shock

Design Pragmatic, multicenter, randomised, outcome assessment-blinded trial of patients with septic shock to RBC transfusion at haemoglobin (Hb) transfusion trigger of 7 g/dl (4.4 mM) or 9 g/dl (5.6 mM), stratified by the presence of haematological malignancy and centre.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria:

To increase the validity of the trial inclusion criteria will be broad with few exclusions

Outcome measures The outcome measures will mainly be patient-important but ICU- and hospital length of stay will also be assessed

Trial size 2 x 500 patients will be needed to show a 9% absolute risk difference in 90-day mortality (baseline mortality of 45%, relative risk reduction 20% (from septic patients in the TRICC trial), alpha of 0.05 (two-sided) and a beta of 0.20 that is a power of 80% (1-beta).

An interim-analysis will be performed after 500 patients. The Data Safety and Monitoring Board (DMSC) will recommend that the trial is stopped if a group-difference in 90-day mortality with p\<0.001.

Time Line The first patient is expected to be randomised December 1st 2011 and the trial database is expected to be closed early 2014. The main manuscript will be submitted shortly thereafter.

Funding The trial is publicly funded by the Danish Strategic Research Council

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
1005
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patient in the ICU AND
  • Fulfil the criteria for septic shock AND
  • Have haemoglobin of 9.0 g/dl (5.6 mM) or less AND
  • Consent obtainable from patient or proxy or national law allows delayed consent
Exclusion Criteria
  • Documented wish against transfusion OR
  • Previous serious adverse reaction with blood product OR
  • Acute coronary syndrome OR
  • Life-threatening bleeding OR
  • RBC transfusion during current ICU admission OR
  • Withdrawal from active therapy or brain death OR
  • Lack of informed consent (depending on national law) OR
  • Acute burn injury regardless of degree and burn surface area

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Liberal blood transfusionSAGM (Saline-Adenine-Glucose-Mannitol) blood transfusionBlood transfusion at haemoglobin 9.0 g/dl (5.6 mM) or less
Restrictive blood transfusionSAGM (Saline-Adenine-Glucose-Mannitol) blood transfusionBlood transfusion at haemoglobin 7.0 g/dl (4.3 mM) or less
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Mortality90 day

All cause 90 day mortality

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Persistent organ failureDay 28

Defined as need for ventilation, vasopressor/inotrope infusion or renal replacement therapy

Anaphylactic/allergic reactionsFollowed up until ICU discharge; an expected average of one week

Defined by the clinician on the basis of mucocutaneous signs and symptoms (e.g. urticaria, pruritus, localised angio- oedema).

Haemolytic complications after transfusion of RBCFollowed up until ICU discharge; an expected average of one week

Defined by the clinician on the basis of haemoglobinuria or increased free plasma haemoglobin.

Transfusion associated acute lung injury (TRALI)Followed up until ICU discharge; an expected average of one week

TRALI defined as:

I. Acute or worsening hypoxaemia ((PaO2/FiO2 \< 40 (PaO2 in kPa) or \<300 (PaO2 in mmHg) regardless of PEEP) OR \> 50% relative increase in FiO2.

AND II. Occurrence within 6 hours after RBC transfusion AND III. Acute or worsening pulmonary infiltrates on frontal chest x-ray OR clinical signs of overt pulmonary oedema

Transfusion associated circulatory overload (TACO)Followed up until ICU discharge; an expected average of one week

TACO defined as:

I. Acute or worsening hypoxaemia ((PaO2/FiO2 \< 40 (PaO2 in kPa) or \<300 (PaO2 in mmHg) regardless of PEEP) OR \> 50% relative increase in FiO2.

AND II. Occurrence within 6 hours after RBC transfusion AND III. Acute or worsening pulmonary infiltrates on frontal chest x-ray OR clinical signs of overt pulmonary oedema AND IV. Increased blood pressure AND VI. Positive fluid balance

Ischaemic eventsFollowed up until ICU discharge; an expected average of one week

Defined as either myocardial, cerebral, intestinal or acute limb ischaemia

Days alive without life support90-days

Life support defined as need for ventilation, vasopressor/inotrope infusion or renal replacement therapy. Days alive without each of these interventions will be reported

Days alive and out of hospital90 days
Mortality within the whole observation periodOne year after randomisation of the last patient

Mortality within the whole observation period reported at day 28, six-month and 1 year after randomisation of the last patient.

Health-related quality of life1 year

Physical and mental component summary scores of SF 36

Trial Locations

Locations (32)

Ålesund Hospital

🇳🇴

Ålesund, Norway

Gentofte Hospital

🇩🇰

Gentofte, Denmark

Rigshospitalet

🇩🇰

Copenhagen, Denmark

Hjørring Hospital

🇩🇰

Hjørring, Denmark

Kolding Hospital

🇩🇰

Kolding, Denmark

Næstved Hospital

🇩🇰

Næstved, Denmark

Randers Hospital

🇩🇰

Randers, Denmark

Slagelse Hospital

🇩🇰

Slagelse, Denmark

Sønderborg Hospital

🇩🇰

Sønderborg, Denmark

Vejle Hospital

🇩🇰

Vejle, Denmark

Helsinki University Hospital

🇫🇮

Helsinki, Finland

Ålborg University Hospital

🇩🇰

Ålborg, Denmark

Joensuu Hospital

🇫🇮

Joensuu, Finland

Tampere University Hospital

🇫🇮

Tampere, Finland

Haukeland University Hospital

🇳🇴

Bergen, Norway

Stavanger University Hospital

🇳🇴

Stavanger, Norway

Akershus University Hospital

🇳🇴

Oslo, Norway

Karolinska Hospital, Huddinge

🇸🇪

Stockholm, Sweden

Halmstad Hospital

🇸🇪

Halmstad, Sweden

Växjö Hospital

🇸🇪

Växjö, Sweden

Helsingborg Hospital

🇸🇪

Helsingborg, Sweden

Södersjukhuset

🇸🇪

Stockholm, Sweden

Karolinska Institutet Solna

🇸🇪

Stockholm, Sweden

Aarhus University Hospital, NBG

🇩🇰

Aarhus, Denmark

Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby

🇩🇰

Aarhus, Denmark

Bispebjerg Hospital

🇩🇰

Copenhagen, Denmark

Glostrup Hospital

🇩🇰

Copenhagen, Denmark

Hvidovre Hospital

🇩🇰

Copenhagen, Denmark

Herning Hospital

🇩🇰

Herning, Denmark

Holbæk Hospital

🇩🇰

Holbæk, Denmark

Horsens Hospital

🇩🇰

Horsens, Denmark

Køge Hospital

🇩🇰

Køge, Denmark

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath