Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02109419
NCT02109419
Completed
Not Applicable

Feasibility and Validity of A Novel Computer Based Battery For Analysis of Cognition, Mood, and Mobility-Independence in the Elderly

Pennington Biomedical Research Center1 site in 1 country57 target enrollmentMarch 2014

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Computerized Assessment Feasibility and Validity
Sponsor
Pennington Biomedical Research Center
Enrollment
57
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Reliability and Validity of HHT's Computerized Assessments as Assessed by Correlation Analysis.
Status
Completed
Last Updated
6 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

While standard pencil-and-paper test have continued to be useful for the monitoring of cognition, mood, and life space (LS) in the elderly they do have considerable limitations. Use of these pencil-and-paper tests requires that individuals come to the clinic for assessments, which results in significant clinical costs and practical limitations in the conducting of assessments in large numbers of individuals, and provides a time consuming and non-automated means of quantifying and recording changes in brain function. It is increasingly recognized that there is a need to develop valid and reliable computer based assessments to allow for the remote assessment of cognition, mood, and other parameters. Development of computerized based assessments will significantly increase the scale, scope, and speed with which cognition and mood can be measured in the elderly.

Helping Hands Technology LLC (HHT) has developed a number of web based assessments of cognition, mood, and LS. These new computerized assessments will be developed using new technology, and are based on the general principles found in existing pencil-and-paper based assessments of cognition, mood, and LS. In addition, HHT is developing proprietary means of reporting the results of the computerized assessments in an easy to use narrative format. This study will focus on quantifying the feasibility and validity of using HHT computerized assessments.

Detailed Description

See Brief Summary Section.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
March 2014
End Date
October 2014
Last Updated
6 years ago
Study Type
Observational
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Corby K. Martin

Principal Investigator

Pennington Biomedical Research Center

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Men and woman between the ages of 60-85, inclusive
  • Cognitive function/impairment within appropriate ranges for the study (Mini-Mental State Exam scores of 10-30, inclusive)

Exclusion Criteria

  • Unable to complete computerized and standard pencil-and-paper based assessments

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Reliability and Validity of HHT's Computerized Assessments as Assessed by Correlation Analysis.

Time Frame: Visit completed over 16 day period

Assess the reliability, validity and internal consistency of the HHT-D (Helping Hands Depression Test; min and max score is 0 and 30, respectively; higher scores reflect higher depression) and the HHT-G (Helping Hands global cognitive function screener; min and max scores are 0 and 30, respectively; higher scores reflect better cognition). In addition to assessing reliability, the HHT scales' validity was examined by correlating scores on the HHT scales with existing and already validated pen-and-paper assessments, which included the Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE; min and max scores are 0 and 30, higher scores reflect better cognitive functioning), and the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS; min and max scores are 0 and 15, respectively; higher scores reflect higher depression).

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials