Robotic Versus Video-assisted Lobectomy/Segmentectomy for Lung Surgery

Not Applicable

Recruiting

• Conditions: Lung Diseases; Surgery

• Registration Number: NCT05270616
• Lead Sponsor: The Second Hospital of Shandong University

Brief Summary

To compare the safety/efficacy of the robotic-assisted lobectomy/segmentectomy (RAL/S) with the video-assisted lobectomy/segmentectomy (VAL/S) for lung resection.

Video-assisted lobectomy/segmentectomy (VAL/S) for lung resection is divided into uniport group and multiple- port group.

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Study Start: 2020-06-01
• Status Verified: 2022-02
• Study First Submitted: 2022-02-27
• Study First Submitted QC: 2022-02-27
• Last Update Submitted: 2022-02-27
• Study First Posted: 2022-03-08
• Last Update Posted: 2022-03-08
• Primary Completion: 2023-06-01
• Study Completion: 2028-06-01

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: RECRUITING
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 800

Inclusion Criteria

1. good cardio- pulmonary function to tolerate surgery;
2. minimaly invasive surgery for lobectomy or segmentectomy or sleeve lobectomy;

Exclusion Criteria

1. cardio- pulmonary function is not good enough to tolerate surgery;
2. huge tumor or extensive adhesion in thoracic cavity.

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
conversion rate to open surgery	during surgery	incidence rate
days to tube removal	within 7 days after surgery	days
mortality	30 days after surgery	incidence rate
retrieved lymph node station	within 1 days after surgery	amount
postoperative complications	within 7 days after surgery	incidence rate
duration of hospitalization	within 7 days after surgery	days
retrieved lymph node	within 1 days after surgery	amount
short- term PFS	3 years	proportion
operation time	within 180 minutes	minutes
short- term overall survival	3 years	proportion

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

The Second Hospital of Shandong University; 🇨🇳 Jinan, Shandong, China