MedPath

Comparison of Positive End Expiratory Pressure Titration Methods in ARDS Patients

Not Applicable
Conditions
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Registration Number
NCT03281473
Lead Sponsor
University Hospital, Angers
Brief Summary

This study aims at assessing the short-term physiological effects of 2 positive end expiratory pressure titration strategies in patients with ARDS.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
20
Inclusion Criteria
  • Age> 18 years
  • Moderate or severe ARDS
  • Consent to participation obtained from a relative
Exclusion Criteria
  • Protect adult
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding woman
  • No-affiliation to the social security scheme
  • Contra-indication to the placement of an esophageal pressure measuring catheter
  • Pneumothorax
  • Hemodynamic and / or respiratory instability
  • Extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
CROSSOVER
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Short-term effects of 2 PEEP titration strategies on gas exchange2 hours 15 minutes
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Short-term effects of 2 PEEP titration strategies on hemodynamics2 hours 15 min
Short-term effects of 2 PEEP titration strategies on respiratory mechanics2 hours 15 min

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

University Hospital

🇫🇷

Angers, France

University Hospital
🇫🇷Angers, France
François BELONCLE, Ass.Pr
Contact
0241353845
Francois.Beloncle@chu-angers.fr

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.