跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT01259245
NCT01259245已完成不适用

Effectiveness of Incorporating Tai Chi in Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program for COPD Patients in Primary Health Care

Kwong Wah Hospital1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 192 人开始时间: 2011年3月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
192
试验地点
1
主要终点
Self Efficacy :COPD Self Efficacy Scale (CSES)

研究概览

简要总结

The purpose of this study was to compare the self-efficacy and quality of life parameters of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease(COPD)patients who underwent pulmonary rehabilitation with and without Tai Chi elements incorporated in the exercise component in a General Out-patient setting.

详细描述

Subjects: 192 patients were enrolled and recruited from four General Out-patient clinics in Yau Tsim Mong and Wong Tai Sin districts.

Study Design: Prospective single blind randomized controlled trial

Subjects were randomized into Pulmonary rehabilitation program (PRP) group (n = 98) and Pulmonary rehabilitation program with Tai chi group (TC)(n=94). Details of PRP and PRP + Tai Chi will be discussed below.

Both groups will be given booklet on COPD information and management.

Randomization:

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
21 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • . Previous diagnosis of COPD
  • . Absence of bronchiectasis, bronchiolitis obliterans, panbronchiolitis and asthma
  • . Medical Research Council(MRC)Dyspnea score > 2 using the 1-5 scale version
  • .Willing to participate and able to give consent

排除标准

  • . Patients with poor mobility, i.e. wheelchair bound; or
  • . Patients with severe comorbidities, including acute myocardial infarction in preceding 6 months; or
  • . Patients with severe hearing impairment or cognitive impairment; or
  • . Patient unwilling to participate and unable to give consent

结局指标

主要结局

Self Efficacy :COPD Self Efficacy Scale (CSES)

时间窗: Change in CSES at 6 months post-intervention

34 item questionnaire consisting of likert scale with 5 responses ranging from "1" indicating " not at all confident" to "5" indicating " very confident" with higher scores representing higher self efficacy. In this study , we used the rating score in the analysis as some items were considered non-applicable in some cases. Rating score from 0.2 to 1 with 0.2 as "not at all confident and 1 as "very confident". The validated Chinese version of CSES was also used

Self- Efficacy : Self-Efficacy for Managing Shortness of Breath ( SEMSOB)

时间窗: Change in SEMSOB at 6 months post-intervention

The SEMSOB is a single question 1-10 scale, valid and reliable instrument that measures patients' overall confidence in keeping breathing difficulties from interfering with what they want to do with higher score indicating greater self efficacy.

SGRQ HKC-Symptoms

时间窗: 6 months post-intervention

SGRQ HKC-Symptoms is calculated by dividing the summed weights by the adjusted maximum possible weight for that component and expressing the result as a percentage. SGRQ-Symptoms score ranged from 0 to 100, where zero indicates best health and 100 indicating maximum disability.

SGRQ HKC-Activity

时间窗: 6 months post-intervention

SGRQ HKC-Activity is calculated by dividing the summed weights by the adjusted maximum possible weight for that component and expressing the result as a percentage. SGRQ-Activity score from 0 to 100, where zero indicates best health and 100 indicating maximum disability.

SGRQ HKC-Impact

时间窗: 6 months post-intervention

SGRQ HKC -Impact is calculated by dividing the summed weights by the adjusted maximum possible weight for that component and expressing the result as a percentage. SGRQ-impact score from 0 to 100, where zero indicates best health and 100 indicating maximum disability.

SGRQ HKC Total

时间窗: 6 months post-intervention

SGRQ HKC-Total is calculated by summing all positive responses in the questionnaire and expressing the result as a percentage of the toal weight for the questionnaire. A total score is calculated from all three components. The SGRQ-total score ranged from 0 to 100, where zero indicates best health and 100 indicating maximum disability.

次要结局

  • FEV1(6 months post-intervention)
  • FEV1% Pred(6 months post-intervention)
  • 6 MWT in Meters(6 months post-intervention)
  • FVC(6 months post intervention)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Lorna Ventura Ng

Senior Medical Officer

Kwong Wah Hospital

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验