跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04259359
NCT04259359招募中不适用

Predominant Sensitizations to Single Bee Venom Allergens as a Risk Factor for Therapy Failure

Medical University of Graz3 个研究点 分布在 3 个国家目标入组 266 人开始时间: 2019年5月2日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施
相关药物

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
招募中
发起方
入组人数
266
试验地点
3
主要终点
The primary objective of the study is to evaluate whether predominant sensitization to Api m 10 is a risk factor for treatment failure.

研究概览

简要总结

Venom immunotherapy (VIT) is an established treatment for Hymenoptera venom allergy and provides long-term protection from further generalized reactions in almost all patients. However, it is still unclear why bee VIT is less effective than vespid VIT.

The preliminary data show that not only predominant Api m 10 sensitization but also other predominant sensitizations may be relevant as risk factors for treatment failure. Interestingly, all patients with a predominant Api m 10 sensitization who received bee VIT with a venom preparation with a supposed lack of Api m 10 tolerated sting challenges. Therefore, a multicenter study with a sufficient number of patients with treatment failure is urgently required, to clarify if predominant sensitization to a bee venom allergen is a risk factor for treatment failure.

If predominant sensitization is a risk factor and caused by underrepresented components in bee venom preparations used for VIT, bee venom preparations may be optimized in the future and patients would benefit from a more effective VIT.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Cohort
时间视角
Prospective

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 70 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Legally competent male and female subjects aged from 18 to 70 years with a history of a systemic anaphylactic sting reaction (≥ grade I according to the classification of Ring and Messmer) after bee stings, who will receive bee venom immunotherapy

排除标准

  • Contraindications to VIT

研究组 & 干预措施

patients who will be treated with bee venom immunotherapy

干预措施: Insect Venom (Drug)

结局指标

主要结局

The primary objective of the study is to evaluate whether predominant sensitization to Api m 10 is a risk factor for treatment failure.

时间窗: depends on the protocol used for VIT and the date of the sting challenge, a maximum of about 6 months if sting challenge is performed right after reaching the maintenance dose

A sensitization is considered predominant if the proportion of specific IgE to a single venom allergen is at least 65% of the specific IgE to the venom preparations.

次要结局

  • To evaluate if low immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) levels to bee venom or to Api m 1, Api m 2, Api m 3, Api m 5, or Api m 10 after VIT is a risk factor for treatment failure.(depends on the protocol used for VIT and the date of the sting challenge, a maximum of about 6 months if sting challenge is performed right after reaching the maintenance dose)
  • To evaluate if predominant sensitization to either Api m 1, Api m 2, Api m 3 or Api m 5 is a risk factor for treatment failure.(depends on the protocol used for VIT and the date of the sting challenge, a maximum of about 6 months if sting challenge is performed right after reaching the maintenance dose)
  • To evaluate if systemic side effects are a risk factor for treatment failure.(depends on the protocol used for VIT and the date of the sting challenge, a maximum of about 6 months if sting challenge is performed right after reaching the maintenance dose)
  • To evaluate if antihypertensive medication is a risk factor for treatment failure.(depends on the protocol used for VIT and the date of the sting challenge, a maximum of about 6 months if sting challenge is performed right after reaching the maintenance dose)

研究者

发起方
Medical University of Graz
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (3)

Loading locations...

相似试验