MedPath

Physical restraint in the intensive care unit: a qualitative systematic review

Not Applicable
Conditions
critically ill patients requiring intensive care
Registration Number
JPRN-UMIN000039113
Lead Sponsor
Fujita Health University Hospital
Brief Summary

Some patients reported that physical restraint did not pose a safety problem. However, some believed that it should not be used because it violated the human rights and dignity of patients (the certainty of the evidence was low). The medical staff was worried about the adverse events, but reported that they used it for safety (high). The medical staff believed that, as alternatives to physical restraint, it was important to modify the existing system (high).

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
Complete: follow-up complete
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
16
Inclusion Criteria

Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

Quantitative research Case reports or case series non-English and non-Japanese language abstracts

Study & Design

Study Type
Others,meta-analysis etc
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Patients' and their families' thoughts regarding physical restraint, medical staff's thoughts regarding physical restraint, alternatives to physical restraint.
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath