跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2021/09/036307
CTRI/2021/09/036307尚未招募不适用

Comparison of the working performance of Ambu Auragain and LMA Proseal among the patients posted for elective surgeries: A randomized control trial

Government Medical College Bhavnagar1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 38 人开始时间: 2021年9月15日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
尚未招募
入组人数
38
试验地点
1
主要终点
To compare Ambu Auragain & LMA Proseal in terms of no. of attempts required, time required for insertion, manipulation required after insertion, failed insertion, oropharyngeal leak pressure, mean tidal expiratory volume

研究概览

简要总结

After taking approval from ethics committee, study will be initiated on patients fulfilling inclusion criteria, patients will be compared for insertion success and working performance of supraglottic airway devices- Ambu Auragain and LMA Proseal in general anaesthesia in patient undergoing elective surgery.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Computer generated randomization
盲法
Participant Blinded

入排标准

年龄范围
18.00 Year(s) 至 60.00 Year(s)(—)
性别
All

入选标准

  • Patients undergoing elective surgeries under general anaesthesia.

排除标准

  • (1)Mouth opening <2 cm (2)Mallampati class 4 (3)Body mass index (BMI) > 30 kg/m2 (4)Upper respiratory tract infection (5)Increased risk of aspiration (not adequate NBM, Gastro oesophageal reflex disorder, hiatus hernia and pregnancy) (6)Need for high airway pressure (COPD patients, Asthma) (7)Cervical spine fracture or instability (8)History of allergy to one or more drugs and latex.

结局指标

主要结局

To compare Ambu Auragain & LMA Proseal in terms of no. of attempts required, time required for insertion, manipulation required after insertion, failed insertion, oropharyngeal leak pressure, mean tidal expiratory volume

时间窗: 2-4 hours

次要结局

  • To compare Ambu Auragain & LMA Proseal and in terms of(hemodynamic response in terms of Heart Rate (HR) & Mean Arteria Pressure (MAP) during insertion of SGA devices,)

研究者

申办方类型
Government medical college

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验