Comparison of Ambu Auragain and LMA Proseal in patients posted for elective surgeries under general anaesthesia
- Conditions
- Medical and Surgical,
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2021/09/036307
- Lead Sponsor
- Government Medical College Bhavnagar
- Brief Summary
After taking approval from ethics committee, study will be initiated on patients fulfilling inclusion criteria, patients will be compared for insertion success and working performance of supraglottic airway devices- Ambu Auragain and LMA Proseal in general anaesthesia in patient undergoing elective surgery.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Not Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 38
Patients undergoing elective surgeries under general anaesthesia.
(1)Mouth opening <2 cm (2)Mallampati class 4 (3)Body mass index (BMI) > 30 kg/m2 (4)Upper respiratory tract infection (5)Increased risk of aspiration (not adequate NBM, Gastro oesophageal reflex disorder, hiatus hernia and pregnancy) (6)Need for high airway pressure (COPD patients, Asthma) (7)Cervical spine fracture or instability (8)History of allergy to one or more drugs and latex.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To compare Ambu Auragain & LMA Proseal in terms of no. of attempts required, time required for insertion, manipulation required after insertion, failed insertion, oropharyngeal leak pressure, mean tidal expiratory volume 2-4 hours
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To compare Ambu Auragain & LMA Proseal and in terms of hemodynamic response in terms of Heart Rate (HR) & Mean Arteria Pressure (MAP) during insertion of SGA devices,
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
SIR T GENERAL HOSPITAL BHAVNAGAR
🇮🇳Bhavnagar, GUJARAT, India
SIR T GENERAL HOSPITAL BHAVNAGAR🇮🇳Bhavnagar, GUJARAT, IndiaDR JUGAL PANKAJBHAI SHUKLAPrincipal investigator7874092929jugalshukla25@gmail.com