Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT03109834
NCT03109834CompletedPhase 3

Choice of Foods, Weight Loss and Metabolic Changes in Overweight Women Willing to Lose Weight With Dietary/Nutritional Therapy Intervention

Bonn Education Association for Dietetics r.A., Cologne, Germany0 sites105 target enrollmentStarted: March 25, 2004Last updated:
Conditions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Phase 3
Status
Completed
Sponsor
Enrollment
105
Primary Endpoint
Weight loss (phase 1)

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Aim of this prospective randomized study was to evaluate whether a diet with meal replacements can be as effective as a conventional energy-restricted modified diet on weight loss, body composition and cardiometabolic risk profile in overweight women. Moreover, the impact of these two different weight management strategies was observed on cardiometabolic risk profile after a self-directed weight stabilization phase following the weight loss phase. After that, the effect of a specific micronutrient composition with omega-3 fatty acids versus placebo on cardiometabolic risk was observed during a following phase of weight loss maintenance.

Detailed Description

Abdominal obesity, atherogenic dyslipidemia and hypertension are essential risk factors for cardiovascular diseases. Several studies showed favorable effects of weight loss in overweight subjects on cardiometabolic risk profile.

The study was divided into a 3-month weight loss phase (phase 1), a subsequent 3-month phase of weight stabilization (phase 2) and a 6-month phase of weight loss maintenance (phase 3).

For a total of 6 months subjects were randomly assigned to the meal replacement (MR) or control (C) group at baseline I.

During weight loss phase both dietary intervention groups followed an energy-restricted diet with a balanced variety of nutrient-dense food of approximately 1200 kcal/d. The MR-WL group (MR group during weight loss phase) was advised to replace two of three meals every day with meal replacements. The C-WL group (C group during weight loss phase) was advised to follow a conventional energy-restricted modified diet with 15-20% of energy intake in the form of protein, 50-55% of energy intake in the form of carbohydrates and 30% of energy intake in the form of fat. All participants attended ten group training sessions for nutrition education.

During weight stabilization phase all women of MR-S and C-S group (MR and C group during weight stabilization phase) were encouraged to consume a self-directed well-balanced variety of nutrient-dense foods without meal intervention. However, the MR-S and C-S group were instructed to continue the implemented nutrition advice of weight loss phase.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 60 Years (Adult)
Sex
Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • BMI: between 27.0 and 34.9 kg/m²
  • One of the following blood lipids: total cholesterol ≥ 200 mg/dL, LDL-cholesterol ≥ 175 mg/dL, HDL-cholesterol ≤ 50 mg/dL, TG 150-400 mg/dL
  • women, 18-60 years

Exclusion Criteria

  • lactose or protein intolerance
  • hypo- or hyperthyroidism
  • pharmacological treatment of diabetes
  • intake of vitamins or mineral supplements
  • anticoagulants
  • cardiac pacemaker
  • contraindications to exercise

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Weight loss (phase 1)

Time Frame: 3-month dietary intervention (from baseline I to 3rd month)

Intervention changes in body weight

Total antioxidant capacity (phase 3)

Time Frame: 6-month dietary intervention (from baseline II to 12th month)

Intervention changes in total antioxidant capacity

Fasting plasma cortisol concentration (phase 3)

Time Frame: 6-month dietary intervention (from baseline II to 12th month)

Intervention changes in fasting plasma cortisol concentration

Secondary Outcomes

  • Waist circumference (phase 3)(6-month dietary intervention (from baseline II to 12th month))
  • Relative body fat (phase 1)(3-month dietary intervention (from baseline I to 3rd month))
  • Fasting plasma cortisol concentration (phase 1)(3-month dietary intervention (from baseline I to 3rd month))
  • Relative body weight (phase 3)(6-month dietary intervention (from baseline II to 12th month))
  • Responder (weight loss > 5%)(12 months (from baseline I to 12th month))
  • Waist circumference (phase 1)(3-month dietary intervention (from baseline I to 3rd month))
  • Total antioxidant capacity (phase 1)(3-month dietary intervention (from baseline I to 3rd month))
  • Relative body weight (phase 1)(3-month dietary intervention (from baseline I to 3rd month))
  • Responder (weight loss > 5%) (phase 1)(3-month dietary intervention (from baseline I to 3rd month))
  • Relative body fat (phase 3)(6-month dietary intervention (from baseline II to 12th month))

Investigators

Sponsor
Bonn Education Association for Dietetics r.A., Cologne, Germany
Sponsor Class
Industry
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Christine Metzner, Professor MD

Christine Metzner, Professor MD

Bonn Education Association for Dietetics r.A., Cologne, Germany

Similar Trials

Effect of Weight Management Programs on... | Clinical Trial