MedPath

Vestibular Socket Therapy Using Acellular Dermal Matrix Versus Connective Tissue Graft

Phase 2
Active, not recruiting
Conditions
Immediate Implant
Interventions
Device: implant
Procedure: Vestibular Socket Therapy
Drug: Alloderm
Drug: Xenogenic bone membrane shield
Procedure: Connective tissue graft
Registration Number
NCT06241196
Lead Sponsor
Tanta University
Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the Vestibular Socket Therapy (VST) technique using alloderm versus connective tissue graft both with xenogenic bone membrane in immediate implants of anterior aesthetic zone.

Detailed Description

Twenty surgical sites will be divided into two groups; each of which has 10 surgical sites. Grouping will be done randomly sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes (SNOSE)

The groups will be treated as follow:

* Group I: Ten sites will be treated by immediate implant and VST with Alloderm + allogenic bone membrane and xenograft.

* Group II: Ten sites will be treated by immediate implant and VST with connective tissue graft + allogenic bone membrane and xenograft Each group will be subjected to intraoral scanning at baseline, 6 months and 12 months. The changes in peri-implant mucosal level will be assessed by superimposition of scanning files of different intervals to monitor the changes in surface area calculated by software.

The changes in gingival phenotype could be assessed at 6 months and 12 months intervals by superimposition of DICOM files on CBCT software Each group will be subjected to Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) at baseline, 6 months and 12months to asses both thickness and height of labial (facial) plate of bone and implant survival.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
10
Inclusion Criteria
  • Adults (20-50) years old.
  • Class II socket according to Elian et al, (7)described as facial soft tissue is present but the buccal plate is partially missing following extraction of the tooth in the maxillary anterior region.
  • Thin gingival phenotype.
  • Bone quality ranges from D2-D3 as gained from preoperative cone beam computed tomography.
  • Presence of at least 3 mm of keratinized gingiva.
  • Optimal compliance as evidenced by no missing treatment appointments and positive attitude towards oral hygiene.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Medically compromised patients and systemic conditions precluding implant and periodontal surgery.
  • Smokers, diabetics, pregnant or lactating women.
  • History of chemotherapy, radiotherapy in head and/or neck region.
  • Bisphosphonate therapy.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Group IimplantTen sites will be treated by immediate implant and VST with Alloderm + allogenic bone membrane and xenograft.
Group IVestibular Socket TherapyTen sites will be treated by immediate implant and VST with Alloderm + allogenic bone membrane and xenograft.
Group IAllodermTen sites will be treated by immediate implant and VST with Alloderm + allogenic bone membrane and xenograft.
Group IXenogenic bone membrane shieldTen sites will be treated by immediate implant and VST with Alloderm + allogenic bone membrane and xenograft.
Group IIimplantTen sites will be treated by immediate implant and VST with connective tissue graft + allogenic bone membrane and xenograft.
Group IIVestibular Socket TherapyTen sites will be treated by immediate implant and VST with connective tissue graft + allogenic bone membrane and xenograft.
Group IIXenogenic bone membrane shieldTen sites will be treated by immediate implant and VST with connective tissue graft + allogenic bone membrane and xenograft.
Group IIConnective tissue graftTen sites will be treated by immediate implant and VST with connective tissue graft + allogenic bone membrane and xenograft.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
changes in gingival phenotypebaseline, 6, 12 months

thickness of peri-implant mucosa

changes in peri-implant mucosal levelbaseline, 6, 12 months

level of peri-implant mucosa

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
thickness of labial (facial) plate of bonebaseline, 6, 12 months

three area measures of facial bone

implant survivalbaseline, 6, 12 months

implant stability, health, mobility and function

height of labial (facial) plate of bonebaseline, 6, 12 months

Apico-coronal height of labial bone

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

TantaU

🇪🇬

Tanta, Gharbia, Egypt

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath