Vestibular Socket Therapy (VST) Versus Partial Extraction Therapy
Not Applicable
Completed
- Conditions
- Dental Implants
- Interventions
- Procedure: Class I extractions sites received immediate implants using the Vestibular Socket TherapyProcedure: class I extractions sites received immediate implants using the Partial Extraction Therapy
- Registration Number
- NCT05112796
- Lead Sponsor
- Hams Hamed Abdelrahman
- Brief Summary
The current randomized clinical trial aimed to compare the VST versus Partial Extraction Therapy (PET) for immediate implant placement in the esthetic zone in class I fresh extraction sites.
The primary outcome was the assessment of vertical dimensional changes in peri-implant soft tissue margin.
The secondary outcome was the assessment of radiographic changes in the thickness of the facial peri-implant tissues.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 16
Inclusion Criteria
- single hopeless maxillary tooth in the esthetic zone
- non-smokers
- systemically healthy
- Class I extraction sites
Exclusion Criteria
- smoking
- Class II and III extraction sites
- hopeless teeth with acute infection or vertical/horizontal root fracture
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description VST technique Class I extractions sites received immediate implants using the Vestibular Socket Therapy - PET technique class I extractions sites received immediate implants using the Partial Extraction Therapy -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Changes in the peri-implant facial tissue thickness at baseline and 6 months through CBCT images (Carestream 8000D- Carestream Dental) that were taken at baseline and 6 months postoperatively
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Private Practice Clinic
🇪🇬Alexandria, Egypt