MedPath

Costoclavicular vs Paracoracoid Approach to Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block: a Feasibility Study

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Upper Limb Injury
Interventions
Device: Ultrasound
Registration Number
NCT02657291
Lead Sponsor
Lawson Health Research Institute
Brief Summary

Patients for upper limb surgeries who are candidates for infraclavicular block will be screened. Two techniques of infraclavicular block will be compared. Measured outcomes are performance times, block onset times, patient satisfaction, quality of block, and requirement for supplementary analgesia.

Detailed Description

Infraclavicular brachial plexus block under ultrasound guidance is used for surgeries on the upper limb. Traditionally, the block is performed at the lateral infraclavicular fossa where the cords are variable in position relative to the axillary artery. A recently introduced technique is the costoclavicular approach where the cords are viewed as relatively more superficial and clustered together compared to the traditional technique. Those meeting the inclusion criteria and will consent to participate in the study will be randomized to have either an infraclavicular block in the paracoracoid approach (Group 1) or an infraclavicular block in the costoclavicular approach (Group 2). All groups will have the same injectable volume (35 mls) and local anesthetic concentration (ropivacaine 0.5%). There will be 35 study patients for each group for a total of 70 patients.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
70
Inclusion Criteria
  • Ambulatory elective surgery of the upper limb
  • ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification system) 1-4
  • Suitable for procedure to be carried out under infraclavicular block
Exclusion Criteria
  • Inability to give informed consent, Allergy to local anesthetics, morphine or fentanyl
  • Ongoing major medical or psychiatric problems
  • Narcotic abuse
  • Peripheral neuropathy or major neurological problems
  • Scarring in area of blockade
  • Inability to co-operate with post-operative evaluation
  • Major coagulopathy
  • Pregnancy and breast-feeding
  • Women of childbearing age who are not taking adequate contraceptive precautions

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
CostoclavicularRopivacaineUltrasound-guided infraclavicular block using Ropivacaine 0.5% 35 mL using the costoclavicular approach
CostoclavicularUltrasoundUltrasound-guided infraclavicular block using Ropivacaine 0.5% 35 mL using the costoclavicular approach
ParacoracoidRopivacaineUltrasound-guided infraclavicular block using Ropivacaine 0.5% 35 mL using the paracoracoid or standard approach
ParacoracoidUltrasoundUltrasound-guided infraclavicular block using Ropivacaine 0.5% 35 mL using the paracoracoid or standard approach
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Block onset time1 hour

From the time needle is removed from the patient's skin up to the time when block is considered adequate for surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Procedure duration1 hour

From the time the US probe touches the skin to the time the needle is removed

Quality of block1 hour
Patient satisfaction1 day

Satisfaction score (VAS ranging from 0 = completely dissatisfied to 10 = completely satisfied)

Requirement for supplemental analgesia or anesthesia1 day

Quality of block will be assessed if adequate for surgery

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

St. Joseph's Hospital

🇨🇦

London, Ontario, Canada

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath