Treatment of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome, a Long-term Follow-up
- Conditions
- Chronic PainComplex Regional Pain Syndromes
- Interventions
- Behavioral: Multimodal rehabilitation
- Registration Number
- NCT04597866
- Lead Sponsor
- Uppsala University
- Brief Summary
Complex regional pain syndrome, CRPS, is an uncommon but often very disabling chronic pain syndrome characterized by, beside pain: sensory disturbances, peripheral autonomic changes and inflammatory features. The diagnosis is subdivided in CRPS type 1 where no nerve injury has been identified, and CRPS type 2 when a major nerve injury has been verified.
A combination of exposure in vivo, a form of behaviour therapy where the patient is gradually confronted with avoided movements and activities, and interventions directly targeting a hypothesized cortical reorganisation is an interesting novel approach for treating CRPS.
The present study consists of (1) a qualitative interview study with 10-15 subjects that has received this form of treatment, in order to better understand their experience and effects of the treatment, and (2) a case series with long-term follow-up of 3-5 subjects that received the treatment för 5-8 years ago, in order to study the long term effects of the treatment.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 10
- Has participated in multimodal treatment for CRPS at Uppsala University Hospital
- Other serious physical or mental condition
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description CRPS Multimodal rehabilitation -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Diagnosis 1 day Whether the subject still fulfill diagnostic criteria for CRPS
Subjective experience 1 day A qualitative interview targeting the subjects own experience of the treatment and its effect
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Acceptance of pain 1 day (0-156, higher scores mean a better outcome) Measured with the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire, CPAQ (0-156, higher scores mean a better outcome)
Level of pain 1 day Subjective level of pain on a Likert-scale 0-10 (NRS)
Fear of pain 1 day (0-52, lower scores mean a better outcome) Measured with the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, TSK (0-52, lower scores mean a better outcome)
Subjective experience of quality of life 3 1 day Life Satisfaction Questionnaire, LiSat 11 (11-66, higher scores means a better outcome)
Neglect of the affected limb 1 day (0-36, lower scores mean a better outcome) Measured with a five item questionnaire (0-36, lower scores mean a better outcome)
Subjective experience of quality of life 1 day Quality of life, measured with the RAND-36 (0-100, higher scores mean a better outcome)
Global impression of change 1 day Global impression of change measured with a single question (0-6, higher scores mean a better outcome)
Pain catastrophizing 1 day (0-52, lower scores mean a better outcome) Measured with Pain Catastrophizing Scale, PCS (0-52, lower scores mean a better outcome)
Avoidance of activities 1 day (0-100, lower scores mean a better outcome) Measured with the Photograph Series of Daily Activities, PHODA (0-100, lower scores mean a better outcome)
Subjective experience of quality of life 2 1 day EuroQol 5D, EQ-5D (0-15, higher scores means a better outcome)
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Uppsala University
🇸🇪Uppsala, Sweden