A comparison of the Extended Mallampati Score with the ratio of patient's height to thyromental distance, the modified Mallampati and the upper lip bite test in predicting difficulty in endotracheal intubation in patients undergoing general enesthesia
Not Applicable
Completed
- Conditions
- Intubation, difficult or failedintubation.
- Registration Number
- IRCT201102185362N2
- Lead Sponsor
- Anesthesiology and Critical Care Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, I
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Complete
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 476
Inclusion Criteria
inclusion crateris : patients who had no previous history of burn or trauma to the airway? had no tumors or mass in the laryngeal? facial and cervical region? had no restricted mobility of the neck and mandible (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis or cervical disk disorders)? had ability to sit and open their mouth.
Exclusion Criteria
Not provided
Study & Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method ELV. Timepoint: before intubation. Method of measurement: physical exam.;DLV. Timepoint: before intubation. Method of measurement: physical exam.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Reduce mortality. Timepoint: after intubation. Method of measurement: physical exam.
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
What molecular mechanisms underlie difficulty in endotracheal intubation in patients with specific anatomical predictors?
How does the Extended Mallampati Score compare to other airway assessment tools in predicting difficult intubation outcomes?
Which biomarkers correlate with the ratio of height to thyromental distance in predicting intubation challenges?
What are the potential adverse events associated with airway assessment techniques in preoperative anesthesia?
How do combination approaches of anatomical and physiological predictors enhance intubation difficulty prediction accuracy?