MedPath

Brain Mechanism and Intervention of Executive-control Dysfunction Among Substance Dependents

Not Applicable
Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation
Substance Dependence
Executive Function Disorder
Interventions
Device: Transcranial alternating current stimulation-true stimulus
Device: Transcranial alternating current stimulation-sham stimulus
Registration Number
NCT05312359
Lead Sponsor
Shanghai Mental Health Center
Brief Summary

The investigators assume that tACS could improve amphetamine and alcohol dependent patients' executive-control function by adjusting the synchronization patterns and enhancing the functional connectivity of the prefrontal-ventral striatum pathway. A random controlled trial will be used to test the effect of θ-tACS treatment. Three months follow-up assessment will be conducted to test the changing of executive-control function and its mechanism.

Detailed Description

Substance abuse has become a major social and public health problem in China, especially for amphetamine abuse and alcohol abuse. Executive-control dysfunction is the main symptom for substance dependents. Previous studies have demonstrated the relationship between cognitive dysfunction and prefrontal-ventral striatum pathway. Studies have shown that abnormal phase synchronization and phase-amplitude coupling (PAC) induced the impairment of cognitive, and tACS could improve executive-control function by adjusting the abnormal synchronization. But it has not been verified among MA or alcohol patients. The investigators assume that tACS could improve MA and alcohol dependent patients' executive-control function by adjusting the synchronization patterns and enhancing the functional connectivity of the prefrontal-ventral striatum pathway. A random controlled trial will be used to test the effect of θ-tACS treatment. Three months follow-up assessment will be conducted to test the changing of executive-control function and its mechanism. This study will provide a practical and theoretical basis for developing a novel treatment for substance dependents.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
210
Inclusion Criteria
  • Aged 18-60, male or female, with 9 or more years of education, and able to complete questionnaire evaluation and behavioral tests
  • Meet DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for amphetamine-type substance addiction or alcohol addiction
  • Have used amphetamine or alcohol for at least one year (at least once a week)
  • Normal vision and hearing, or within the normal range after correction
  • Agree to cooperate in the follow-up evaluation
  • No metal implantation in the head, no history of nerve problems or head injury, and no skin sensitivity
Exclusion Criteria
  • Have severe cognitive impairment, such as a history of head trauma, cerebrovascular disease, epilepsy, etc.
  • Have used drugs promoting cognitive function in the last 6 months
  • Have impaired intelligence (IQ<70)
  • Abuse or dependence of other psychoactive substances (except nicotine) in the last 5 years

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Intervention group of alcohol addictionTranscranial alternating current stimulation-true stimulusA 20-minute tACS intervention of real-stimulus is conducted twice a day for a total of 10 days in the intervention group of alcohol addiction.
Control group of alcohol addictionTranscranial alternating current stimulation-sham stimulusA 20-minute tACS intervention of sham-stimulus is conducted twice a day for a total of 10 days in the control group of alcohol addiction.
Intervention group of amphetamine addictionTranscranial alternating current stimulation-true stimulusA 20-minute tACS intervention of real-stimulus is conducted twice a day for a total of 10 days in the intervention group of amphetamine addiction.
Control group of amphetamine addictionTranscranial alternating current stimulation-sham stimulusA 20-minute tACS intervention of sham-stimulus is conducted twice a day for a total of 10 days in the control group of amphetamine addiction.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
The change of theta(θ) phase synchronicitybaseline, immediately after the intervention, one month after the intervention, three months after the intervention

The change of θ phase synchronicity in the prefrontal - ventral striatum pathway in amphetamine addicts and alcohol addicts will be measured by EEG.

The change of theta-gamma phase amplitude coupling(θ-γ PAC)baseline, immediately after the intervention, one month after the intervention, three months after the intervention

The change of θ-γ PAC in the prefrontal - ventral striatum pathway in amphetamine addicts and alcohol addicts will be measured by EEG.

The change of inhibitory control abilitybaseline, immediately after the intervention, one month after the intervention, three months after the intervention

The change of inhibitory control ability will be reflected by participants' performance in the Go/No Go task.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
The change of working memorybaseline, immediately after the intervention, one month after the intervention, three months after the intervention

The change of working memory will be measured by the two-back task.

DA metabolic ratebaseline

DA metabolism was measured by Positron Emission Computed Tomography

The change of decision-making abilitybaseline, immediately after the intervention, one month after the intervention, three months after the intervention

The change of decision-making ability will be measured by the Balloon Analog Risk Task.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Shanghai Mental Health Center

🇨🇳

Shanghai, Shanghai, China

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath