MedPath

Efficacy of Two ONS in Patients at Nutritional Risk With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Type 2 Diabetes
Malnutrition
Interventions
Dietary Supplement: Diabetic
Dietary Supplement: Control
Registration Number
NCT05423938
Lead Sponsor
Fundación Pública Andaluza para la Investigación de Málaga en Biomedicina y Salud
Brief Summary

Rationale: The aim of the study was to compare the glycemic and insulinemic response of malnourished patients with type 2 diabetes after oral feed between a diabetic oral nutritional supplements (ONS) and a standard one.

Methods: Randomized, double-blind, crossover, multicenter clinical trial, conducted in patients with type 2 diabetes and a diagnosis of malnutrition (SGA). Patients were randomized to receive two ONS: diabetic (Bi1 diacare hp/hc) or control (standard, isocaloric and isoproteic), a week apart. A glycemia and insulinemia curve was made at times: 0', 30', 60', 90', 120', and 180', after drank 200 ml of the ONS. The analyzed variables were the area under the curve (AUC 0-t) of glucosa and insulin, and the maximum concentration of glucose (Cmax).

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
29
Inclusion Criteria
  • Diagnosed with DM2 (confirmed by the use of oral hypoglycemic agents for at least two months).
  • Patients at nutritional risk diagnosed through the Subjective Global Assessment.
  • Adequate cultural level and understanding of the clinical study.
  • Agree to voluntarily participate in the study and give their informed consent in writing.
  • Non-pregnant and non-lactating women or women who have given birth at least six weeks prior to the screening visit.
Exclusion Criteria
  1. Type 1 DM, DM2 with insulin treatment and DM secondary to steroids.
  2. Consumption of alpha-glucosidase inhibitors.
  3. Current infection (requiring medication or hospitalization), patients undergoing inpatient surgery, or receiving corticosteroids within the past three months or antibiotics within the past three weeks prior to Screening Visit.
  4. BMI > 35 Kg/m2.
  5. Active malignant neoplasm (except the following dermal malignancies: basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, carcinoma in situ of the cervix uteri).
  6. End-stage organ failure (such as end-stage renal disease) or organ transplant.
  7. Advanced chronic kidney disease (glomerular filtration rate < 30 ml/min).
  8. Severe liver disease.
  9. Severe gastroparesis.
  10. Chronic infectious disease, such as active tuberculosis, hepatitis B or C, or HIV infection.
  11. Consumption of phytotherapy products, dietary supplements or medications except oral hypoglycemic agents, during the four weeks prior to the screening visit, which could profoundly affect (in the opinion of the PI) blood glucose.
  12. Allergy or intolerance to any component of the products under study.
  13. Participation in a concurrent trial that conflicts with this study.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
CROSSOVER
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Bi1 diacare hp-hcDiabeticDuring 6 days, patients received 2 ONS of a specific formula for diabetes, high energy (300 kcal/unit) and high protein (20%), with fiber, EPA\&DHA, EVOO and a specific mix of low glycemic index of carbohydrate
ControlControlDuring 6 days, patients received 2 ONS of a standar formula, high energy (300 kcal/unit) and high protein (20%), without fiber, without EPA\&DHA, without EVOO and without a specific mix of low glycemic index of carbohydrate
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Postprandial glycemic response180 minutes
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Postprandial insulin response180 minutes

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

José M. García Almeida

🇪🇸

Málaga, Spain

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath