Generate Real World Data On Tofacitinib Induction Therapy and Changes In Clinical and Patient Reported Outcomes.

Terminated

Conditions: Ulcerative Colitis

Interventions: Other: Stool sample collection

Registration Number: NCT05069259

Lead Sponsor: Pfizer

Brief Summary: This study is expected to contribute to the body of real-world data of tofacitinib's safety and efficacy profile in ulcerative colitis. Conventional clinical outcomes will give a better understanding of response and remission rates in a representative, post-marketing population.

Regular patient questionnaires and measurement of a biomarker of gut inflammation will provide detail on how patients experience induction treatment and contextualise the efficacy data.

Detailed Description: This is a low-interventional study in which the intervention under study is home fecal calprotectin testing which falls outside of normal standard of care in ulcerative colitis. Tofacitinib is prescribed and administered as per the Swiss prescribing information. Accordingly, this study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov as an interventional study. Under Swiss law, this study is considered and approved as a non-interventional study (Category A, Human Research Ordinance, Swiss Confederation).

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status: TERMINATED

Sex: All

Target Recruitment: 18

Inclusion Criteria

Male or female participants 18 years of age or older at screening visit
Participants with confirmed diagnosis of UC and who are prescribed tofacitinib (Xeljanz®) for moderately to severely active UC as per the Swiss label
Participants who are willing and able to comply with all scheduled visits, treatment plan, study interventions, and other study procedures
Capable of giving personally signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

Presence of clinical findings suggestive of Crohn's disease
Any previous exposure to tofacitinib including participation in the tofacitinib clinical program
Co-medication with any other advanced therapies for UC (biologics*, azathioprine, mercaptopurine and methotrexate) or any other JAK inhibitor
Any identified contra-indications for use of tofacitinib as per the Swiss label
Not owning a handheld digital device compatible with the Sidekick Health App, not willing to have it installed on this device or not capable of using the App
Investigator site staff or Pfizer employees directly involved in the conduct of the study, site staff otherwise supervised by the investigator, and their respective family members.

Study & Design

Study Type: OBSERVATIONAL

Study Design: Not specified

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
Patients with active Ulcerative Colitis	Stool sample collection	-

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Response at Week 8	Week 8	Clinical response was defined as a reduction in the partial Mayo score (PMS) from baseline of \>=2 points or achieving clinical remission. Clinical remission was defined as PMS of \<= 2 with no subscore \>1. PMS consisted of 3 components: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, and physician global assessment of disease activity. Each sub score ranged from 0 (normal) to 3 (extreme severity). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 (normal) to 9 (extreme severity), where higher scores indicated more disease severity.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Remission at Week 8	Week 8	Clinical remission was defined as PMS of \<= 2 with no subscore \>1. PMS consisted of 3 components: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, and physician global assessment of disease activity. Each sub score ranged from 0 (normal) to 3 (extreme severity). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 (normal) to 9 (extreme severity), where higher scores indicated more disease severity.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Response at Week 16	Week 16	Clinical response was defined as a reduction in the PMS from baseline of \>=2 points or achieving clinical remission. Clinical remission was defined as PMS of \<= 2 with no subscore \>1. PMS consisted of 3 components: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, and physician global assessment of disease activity. Each sub score ranged from 0 (normal) to 3 (extreme severity). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 (normal) to 9 (extreme severity), where higher scores indicated more disease severity.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Remission at Week 16	Week 16	Clinical remission was defined as PMS of \<= 2 with no subscore \>1. PMS consisted of 3 components: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, and physician global assessment of disease activity. Each sub score ranged from 0 (normal) to 3 (extreme severity). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 (normal) to 9 (extreme severity), where higher scores indicated more disease severity.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Remission at Week 8	Week 8	IBDQ remission was defined as an IBDQ score \>= 170. The IBDQ was a 32-item questionnaire grouped into four dimensions: bowel symptoms, systemic symptoms, emotional function and social function, where range was as follows: bowel symptoms: 10 to 70; systemic symptoms: 5 to 35; emotional function: 12 to 84 and social function: 5 to 35. The total IBDQ score ranged from 32 to 224. For the total score and each domain, a higher score indicated better quality of life.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved IBDQ Remission at Week 16	Week 16	IBDQ remission was defined as an IBDQ score \>= 170. The IBDQ was a 32-item questionnaire grouped into four dimensions: bowel symptoms, systemic symptoms, emotional function and social function, where range was as follows: bowel symptoms: 10 to 70; systemic symptoms: 5 to 35; emotional function: 12 to 84 and social function: 5 to 35. The total IBDQ score ranged from 32 to 224. For the total score and each domain, a higher score indicated better quality of life.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved IBDQ Response at Week 8	Week 8	IBDQ response was defined as an IBDQ score \>=16 points higher than IBDQ baseline score. The IBDQ was a 32-item questionnaire grouped into four dimensions: bowel symptoms, systemic symptoms, emotional function and social function, where range was as follows: bowel symptoms: 10 to 70; systemic symptoms: 5 to 35; emotional function: 12 to 84 and social function: 5 to 35. The total IBDQ score ranged from 32 to 224. For the total score and each domain, a higher score indicated better quality of life.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved IBDQ Response at Week 16	Week 16	IBDQ response was defined as an IBDQ score \>=16 points higher than IBDQ baseline score. The IBDQ was a 32-item questionnaire grouped into four dimensions: bowel symptoms, systemic symptoms, emotional function and social function, where range was as follows: bowel symptoms: 10 to 70; systemic symptoms: 5 to 35; emotional function: 12 to 84 and social function: 5 to 35. The total IBDQ score ranged from 32 to 224. For the total score and each domain, a higher score indicated better quality of life.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Biochemical Remission at Week 8	Week 8	Biochemical remission was defined as a fecal calprotectin (fCAL) concentration \<=250 micrograms per gram (mcg/g). fCAL is a small anti-microbial protein detected in stool that constitutes approximately 60% of neutrophil cytoplasm. As migration of neutrophils into the intestinal mucosa is a hallmark of active intestinal inflammation, fCAL serves as a non-invasive biomarker for intestinal inflammation.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Biochemical Remission at Week 16	Week 16	Biochemical remission was defined as a fCAL concentration \<=250 mcg/g. fCAL is a small anti-microbial protein detected in stool that constitutes approximately 60% of neutrophil cytoplasm. As migration of neutrophils into the intestinal mucosa is a hallmark of active intestinal inflammation, fCAL serves as a non-invasive biomarker for intestinal inflammation.
Median Change From Baseline in Stool Frequency Measured by Mayo Score Stool Frequency Subscore at Weeks 8 and 16	Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16	The stool frequency patient reported outcome (PRO) was assessed with one question about the number of stools on a given day. The Mayo Score stool frequency subscore was used for scoring. Scores ranged from 0 to 3 (0= normal number of stools; 1= 1-2 stools more than normal; 2= 3-4 stools more than normal and 3= 5 or more stools than normal) where higher scores indicated more severe disease activity.
Median Change From Baseline in Rectal Bleeding Measured by Mayo Score Rectal Bleeding Subscore at Weeks 8 and 16	Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16	The rectal bleeding PRO was assessed with one question about most severe rectal bleeding on a given day. The Mayo Score rectal bleeding subscore was used for scoring. Scores ranged from 0 to 3 (0= no blood seen; 1= streaks of blood with stool less than half the time; 2= obvious blood with stool most of the time and 3= blood alone passes) where higher scores indicated more severe bleeding of the day.
Median Change From Baseline in Urgency of Defecation Assessed Using Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Weeks 8 and 16	Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16	The urgency of defecation was assessed with the urgency NRS. Scoring was done on a 11-point NRS. Participant provided a score from 0 (no urgency) to 10 (worst possible urgency). Higher scores indicated more severe urgency.
Median Change From Baseline in Abdominal Pain Assessed Using Pain NRS at Weeks 8 and 16	Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16	The abdominal pain was assessed with the pain NRS. Scoring was done on a 10-point horizontal NRS. Participant provided a score from 1 (none) to 10 (very severe). Higher scores indicated more severe pain.
Median Change From Baseline in Quality of Sleep Assessed Using NRS at Weeks 8 and 16	Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16	The quality of sleep was assessed with a question from the sleep quality visual analogue scale survey. Scoring was done on a 11 NRS. Participant provided a score from 0 (very bad) to 10 (great). Higher scores indicated better quality of sleep.
Median Change From Baseline in Daily Fatigue Assessed Using NRS at Weeks 8 and 16	Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16	The daily fatigue was assessed with the fatigue NRS. Scoring was done on a 11-point NRS. Participant provided a score from 0 (no fatigue) to 10 (as bad as you can imagine). Higher scores indicated more severe fatigue.
Median Change From Baseline in Weekly Fatigue Assessed Using FACIT-F at Weeks 8 and 16	Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16	The weekly fatigue was assessed with 13 questions from the functional assessment of chronic illness therapy - fatigue (FACIT-F) version (v)4. Participants rated the intensity of their fatigue symptoms on a scale of 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much) for each 13 questions. Total score ranged from 0 to 52, with higher scores representing greater fatigue.
Median Change From Baseline in IBDQ Score (Total) at Weeks 8 and 16	Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16	The IBDQ was a 32-item questionnaire grouped into four dimensions: bowel symptoms, systemic symptoms, emotional function and social function, where range was as follows: bowel symptoms: 10 to 70; systemic symptoms: 5 to 35; emotional function: 12 to 84 and social function: 5 to 35. The total IBDQ score ranged from 32 to 224. For the total score and each domain, a higher score indicated better quality of life.
Median Change From Baseline in fCAL at Weeks 8 and 16	Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16	fCAL is a small anti-microbial protein detected in stool that constitutes approximately 60% of neutrophil cytoplasm. As migration of neutrophils into the intestinal mucosa is a hallmark of active intestinal inflammation, fCAL serves as a non-invasive biomarker for intestinal inflammation.
Correlations Between PMS and IBDQ Score	Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16	Correlation between PMS and IBDQ score was assessed by Spearman correlation coefficient. PMS consisted of 3 components: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, and physician global assessment of disease activity. Each sub score ranged from 0 (normal) to 3 (extreme severity). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 (normal) to 9 (extreme severity), where higher scores indicated more disease severity. The IBDQ was a 32-item questionnaire grouped into four dimensions: bowel symptoms, systemic symptoms, emotional function and social function, where range was as follows: bowel symptoms: 10 to 70; systemic symptoms: 5 to 35; emotional function: 12 to 84 and social function: 5 to 35. The total IBDQ score ranged from 32 to 224. For the total score and each domain, a higher score indicated better quality of life.
Correlations Between PMS and fCAL Concentration	Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16	Correlation between PMS and fCAL concentration was assessed by Spearman correlation coefficient. PMS consisted of 3 components: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, and physician global assessment of disease activity. Each sub score ranged from 0 (normal) to 3 (extreme severity). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 (normal) to 9 (extreme severity), where higher scores indicated more disease severity. fCAL is a small anti-microbial protein detected in stool that constitutes approximately 60% of neutrophil cytoplasm. As migration of neutrophils into the intestinal mucosa is a hallmark of active intestinal inflammation, fCAL serves as a non-invasive biomarker for intestinal inflammation.
Correlations Between Stool Frequency and fCAL Concentration	Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16	Correlation between stool frequency PRO and fCAL concentration was assessed by Spearman correlation coefficient. The stool frequency PRO was assessed with one question about the number of stools on a given day. The mayo score stool frequency subscore was used for scoring. Scores ranged from 0 to 3 (0= normal number of stools; 1= 1-2 stools more than normal; 2= 3-4 stools more than normal and 3= 5 or more stools than normal) where higher scores indicated more severe disease activity. fCAL is a small anti-microbial protein detected in stool that constitutes approximately 60% of neutrophil cytoplasm. As migration of neutrophils into the intestinal mucosa is a hallmark of active intestinal inflammation, fCAL serves as a non-invasive biomarker for intestinal inflammation.
Correlations Between Rectal Bleeding and fCAL Concentration	Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16	Correlation between rectal bleeding PRO and fCAL concentration was assessed by Spearman correlation coefficient. The rectal bleeding PRO was assessed with one question about most severe rectal bleeding on a given day. The Mayo Score rectal bleeding subscore was used for scoring. Scores ranged from 0 to 3 (0= no blood seen; 1= streaks of blood with stool less than half the time; 2= obvious blood with stool most of the time and 3= blood alone passes) where higher scores indicated more severe bleeding of the day. fCAL is a small anti-microbial protein detected in stool that constitutes approximately 60% of neutrophil cytoplasm. As migration of neutrophils into the intestinal mucosa is a hallmark of active intestinal inflammation, fCAL serves as a non-invasive biomarker for intestinal inflammation.
Correlations Between Urgency of Defecation and fCAL Concentration	Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16	Correlation between urgency of defecation and fCAL concentration was assessed by Spearman correlation coefficient. The urgency of defecation was assessed with the urgency NRS. Scoring was done on a 11-point NRS. Participant provided a score from 0 (no urgency) to 10 (worst possible urgency). Higher scores indicated more severe urgency. fCAL is a small anti-microbial protein detected in stool that constitutes approximately 60% of neutrophil cytoplasm. As migration of neutrophils into the intestinal mucosa is a hallmark of active intestinal inflammation, fCAL serves as a non-invasive biomarker for intestinal inflammation.
Correlations Between Abdominal Pain and fCAL Concentration	Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16	Correlation between abdominal pain and fCAL was assessed by Spearman correlation coefficient. The abdominal pain was assessed with the pain NRS. Scoring was done on a 10-point horizontal NRS. Participant provided a score from 1 (none) to 10 (very severe). Higher scores indicated more severe pain. fCAL is a small anti-microbial protein detected in stool that constitutes approximately 60% of neutrophil cytoplasm. As migration of neutrophils into the intestinal mucosa is a hallmark of active intestinal inflammation, fCAL serves as a non-invasive biomarker for intestinal inflammation.
Correlations Between Quality of Sleep and fCAL Concentration	Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16	Correlation between quality of sleep and fCAL concentration was assessed by Spearman correlation coefficient. The quality of sleep was assessed with a question from the sleep quality visual analogue scale survey. Scoring was done on a 11-point NRS. Participant provided a score from 0 (very bad) to 10 (great). Higher scores indicated better quality of sleep. fCAL is a small anti-microbial protein detected in stool that constitutes approximately 60% of neutrophil cytoplasm. As migration of neutrophils into the intestinal mucosa is a hallmark of active intestinal inflammation, fCAL serves as a non-invasive biomarker for intestinal inflammation.
Correlations Between Daily Fatigue and fCAL Concentration	Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16	Correlation between daily fatigue and fCAL concentration was assessed by Spearman correlation coefficient. The daily fatigue was assessed with the fatigue NRS. Scoring was done on a 11-point NRS. Participant provided a score from 0 (no fatigue) to 10 (as bad as you can imagine). Higher scores indicated more severe fatigue. fCAL is a small anti-microbial protein detected in stool that constitutes approximately 60% of neutrophil cytoplasm. As migration of neutrophils into the intestinal mucosa is a hallmark of active intestinal inflammation, fCAL serves as a non-invasive biomarker for intestinal inflammation.
Correlations Between Weekly Fatigue and fCAL Concentration	Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16	Correlation between weekly fatigue and fCAL concentration was assessed by Spearman correlation coefficient. The weekly fatigue was assessed with 13 questions from the FACIT-F v4. Participants rated the intensity of their fatigue symptoms on a scale of 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much) for each 13 questions. Total score ranged from 0 to 52, with higher scores representing greater fatigue. fCAL is a small anti-microbial protein detected in stool that constitutes approximately 60% of neutrophil cytoplasm. As migration of neutrophils into the intestinal mucosa is a hallmark of active intestinal inflammation, fCAL serves as a non-invasive biomarker for intestinal inflammation.
Correlations Between IBDQ Score and fCAL Concentration	Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16	Correlation between IBDQ score and fCAL concentration was assessed by Spearman correlation coefficient. The IBDQ was a 32-item questionnaire grouped into four dimensions: bowel symptoms, systemic symptoms, emotional function and social function, where range was as follows: bowel symptoms: 10 to 70; systemic symptoms: 5 to 35; emotional function: 12 to 84 and social function: 5 to 35. The total IBDQ score ranged from 32 to 224. For the total score and each domain, a higher score indicated better quality of life. fCAL is a small anti-microbial protein detected in stool that constitutes approximately 60% of neutrophil cytoplasm. As migration of neutrophils into the intestinal mucosa is a hallmark of active intestinal inflammation, fCAL serves as a non-invasive biomarker for intestinal inflammation.
Correlations Between Stool Frequency and IBDQ Score	Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16	Correlation between stool frequency PRO and IBDQ score was assessed by Spearman correlation coefficient. The stool frequency PRO was assessed with one question about the number of stools on a given day. The Mayo Score stool frequency subscore was used for scoring. Scores ranged from 0 to 3 (0= normal number of stools; 1= 1-2 stools more than normal; 2= 3-4 stools more than normal and 3= 5 or more stools than normal) where higher scores indicated more severe disease activity. The IBDQ was a 32-item questionnaire grouped into four dimensions: bowel symptoms, systemic symptoms, emotional function and social function, where range was as follows: bowel symptoms: 10 to 70; systemic symptoms: 5 to 35; emotional function: 12 to 84 and social function: 5 to 35. The total IBDQ score ranged from 32 to 224. For the total score and each domain, a higher score indicated better quality of life.
Correlations Between Rectal Bleeding and IBDQ Score	Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16	Correlation between rectal bleeding PRO and IBDQ score was assessed by Spearman correlation coefficient. The rectal bleeding PRO was assessed with one question about most severe rectal bleeding on a given day. The Mayo Score rectal bleeding subscore was used for scoring. Scores ranged from 0 to 3 (0= no blood seen; 1= streaks of blood with stool less than half the time; 2= obvious blood with stool most of the time and 3= blood alone passes) where higher scores indicated more severe bleeding of the day. The IBDQ was a 32-item questionnaire grouped into four dimensions: bowel symptoms, systemic symptoms, emotional function and social function, where range was as follows: bowel symptoms: 10 to 70; systemic symptoms: 5 to 35; emotional function: 12 to 84 and social function: 5 to 35. The total IBDQ score ranged from 32 to 224. For the total score and each domain, a higher score indicated better quality of life.
Correlations Between Urgency of Defecation and IBDQ Score	Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16	Correlation between urgency of defecation and IBDQ score was assessed by Spearman correlation coefficient. The urgency of defecation was assessed with the urgency NRS. Scoring was done on a 11-point NRS. Participant provided a score from 0 (no urgency) to 10 (worst possible urgency). Higher scores indicated more severe urgency. The IBDQ was a 32-item questionnaire grouped into four dimensions: bowel symptoms, systemic symptoms, emotional function and social function, where range was as follows: bowel symptoms: 10 to 70; systemic symptoms: 5 to 35; emotional function: 12 to 84 and social function: 5 to 35. The total IBDQ score ranged from 32 to 224. For the total score and each domain, a higher score indicated better quality of life.
Correlations Between Abdominal Pain and IBDQ Score	Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16	Correlation between abdominal pain and IBDQ score was assessed by Spearman correlation coefficient. The abdominal pain was assessed with the pain NRS. Scoring was done on a 10-point horizontal NRS. Participant provided a score from 1 (none) to 10 (very severe). Higher scores indicated more severe pain. The IBDQ was a 32-item questionnaire grouped into four dimensions: bowel symptoms, systemic symptoms, emotional function and social function, where range was as follows: bowel symptoms: 10 to 70; systemic symptoms: 5 to 35; emotional function: 12 to 84 and social function: 5 to 35. The total IBDQ score ranged from 32 to 224. For the total score and each domain, a higher score indicated better quality of life.
Correlations Between Quality of Sleep and IBDQ Score	Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16	Correlation between quality of sleep and IBDQ score was assessed by Spearman correlation coefficient. The quality of sleep was assessed with a question from the sleep quality visual analogue scale survey. Scoring was done on a 11-point NRS. Participant provided a score from 0 (very bad) to 10 (great). Higher scores indicated better quality of sleep. The IBDQ was a 32-item questionnaire grouped into four dimensions: bowel symptoms, systemic symptoms, emotional function and social function, where range was as follows: bowel symptoms: 10 to 70; systemic symptoms: 5 to 35; emotional function: 12 to 84 and social function: 5 to 35. The total IBDQ score ranged from 32 to 224. For the total score and each domain, a higher score indicated better quality of life.
Correlations Between Daily Fatigue and IBDQ Score	Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16	Correlation between daily fatigue and IBDQ score was assessed by Spearman correlation coefficient. The daily fatigue was assessed with the fatigue NRS. Scoring was done on a 11-point NRS. Participant provided a score from 0 (no fatigue) to 10 (as bad as you can imagine). Higher scores indicated more severe fatigue. The IBDQ was a 32-item questionnaire grouped into four dimensions: bowel symptoms, systemic symptoms, emotional function and social function, where range was as follows: bowel symptoms: 10 to 70; systemic symptoms: 5 to 35; emotional function: 12 to 84 and social function: 5 to 35. The total IBDQ score ranged from 32 to 224. For the total score and each domain, a higher score indicated better quality of life.
Correlations Between Weekly Fatigue and IBDQ Score	Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16	Correlation between weekly fatigue and IBDQ score was assessed by Spearman correlation coefficient. The weekly fatigue was assessed with 13 questions from the FACIT-F v4. Participants rated the intensity of their fatigue symptoms on a scale of 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much) for each 13 questions. Total score ranged from 0 to 52, with higher scores representing greater fatigue. The IBDQ was a 32-item questionnaire grouped into four dimensions: bowel symptoms, systemic symptoms, emotional function and social function, where range was as follows: bowel symptoms: 10 to 70; systemic symptoms: 5 to 35; emotional function: 12 to 84 and social function: 5 to 35. The total IBDQ score ranged from 32 to 224. For the total score and each domain, a higher score indicated better quality of life.
Correlations Between PMS and Stool Frequency	Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16	Correlation between PMS and stool frequency PRO was assessed by Spearman correlation coefficient. PMS consisted of 3 components: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, and physician global assessment of disease activity. Each sub score ranged from 0 (normal) to 3 (extreme severity). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 (normal) to 9 (extreme severity), where higher scores indicated more disease severity. The stool frequency PRO was assessed with one question about the number of stools on a given day. The Mayo Score stool frequency subscore was used for scoring. Scores ranged from 0 to 3 (0= normal number of stools; 1= 1-2 stools more than normal; 2= 3-4 stools more than normal and 3= 5 or more stools than normal) where higher scores indicated more severe disease activity.
Correlations Between PMS and Rectal Bleeding	Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16	Correlation between PMS and rectal bleeding PRO was assessed by Spearman correlation coefficient. PMS consisted of 3 components: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, and physician global assessment of disease activity. Each sub score ranged from 0 (normal) to 3 (extreme severity). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 (normal) to 9 (extreme severity), where higher scores indicated more disease severity. The rectal bleeding PRO was assessed with one question about most severe rectal bleeding on a given day. The Mayo Score rectal bleeding subscore was used for scoring. Scores ranged from 0 to 3 (0= no blood seen; 1= streaks of blood with stool less than half the time; 2= obvious blood with stool most of the time and 3= blood alone passes) where higher scores indicated more severe bleeding of the day.
Correlations Between PMS and Urgency of Defecation	Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16	Correlation between PMS and urgency of defecation was assessed by Spearman correlation coefficient. PMS consisted of 3 components: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, and physician global assessment of disease activity. Each sub score ranged from 0 (normal) to 3 (extreme severity). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 (normal) to 9 (extreme severity), where higher scores indicated more disease severity. The urgency of defecation was assessed with the urgency NRS. Scoring was done on a 11-point NRS. Participant provided a score from 0 (no urgency) to 10 (worst possible urgency). Higher scores indicated more severe urgency.
Correlations Between PMS and Abdominal Pain	Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16	Correlation between PMS and abdominal pain was assessed by Spearman correlation coefficient. PMS consisted of 3 components: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, and physician global assessment of disease activity. Each sub score ranged from 0 (normal) to 3 (extreme severity). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 (normal) to 9 (extreme severity), where higher scores indicated more disease severity. The abdominal pain was assessed with the pain NRS. Scoring was done on a 10-point horizontal NRS. Participant provided a score from 1 (none) to 10 (very severe). Higher scores indicated more severe pain.
Correlations Between PMS and Quality of Sleep	Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16	Correlation between PMS and quality of sleep was assessed by Spearman correlation coefficient. PMS consisted of 3 components: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, and physician global assessment of disease activity. Each sub score ranged from 0 (normal) to 3 (extreme severity). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 (normal) to 9 (extreme severity), where higher scores indicated more disease severity. The quality of sleep was assessed with a question from the sleep quality visual analogue scale survey. Scoring was done on a 11-point NRS. Participant provided a score from 0 (very bad) to 10 (great). Higher scores indicated better quality of sleep.
Correlations Between PMS and Daily Fatigue	Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16	Correlation between PMS and daily fatigue was assessed by Spearman correlation coefficient. PMS consisted of 3 components: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, and physician global assessment of disease activity. Each sub score ranged from 0 (normal) to 3 (extreme severity). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 (normal) to 9 (extreme severity), where higher scores indicated more disease severity. The daily fatigue was assessed with the fatigue NRS. Scoring was done on a 11-point NRS. Participant provided a score from 0 (no fatigue) to 10 (as bad as you can imagine). Higher scores indicated more severe fatigue.
Correlations Between PMS and Weekly Fatigue	Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16	Correlation between PMS and weekly fatigue was assessed by Spearman correlation coefficient. PMS consisted of 3 components: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, and physician global assessment of disease activity. Each sub score ranged from 0 (normal) to 3 (extreme severity). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 (normal) to 9 (extreme severity), where higher scores indicated more disease severity. The weekly fatigue was assessed with 13 questions from the FACIT-F v4. Participants rated the intensity of their fatigue symptoms on a scale of 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much) for each 13 questions. Total score ranged from 0 to 52, with higher scores representing greater fatigue.
Median fCAL Concentrations Over Time Stratified by Week 8 Clinical Remission Status	Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16	Clinical remission was defined as PMS of \<= 2 with no subscore \>1. Partial mayo score consisted of 3 components: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, and physician global assessment of disease activity. Each sub score ranged from 0 (normal) to 3 (extreme severity). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 (normal) to 9 (extreme severity), where higher scores indicated more disease severity. In this outcome measure, fCAL concentration are reported at specified time points in those participants who had clinical remission at Week 8 and in those participants who did not have clinical remission at Week 8.
Median fCAL Concentrations Over Time Stratified by Week 16 Clinical Remission Status	Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16	Clinical remission was defined as PMS of \<= 2 with no subscore \>1. Partial mayo score consisted of 3 components: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, and physician global assessment of disease activity. Each sub score ranged from 0 (normal) to 3 (extreme severity). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 (normal) to 9 (extreme severity), where higher scores indicated more disease severity. In this outcome measure, fCAL concentration are reported at specified time points in those participants who had clinical remission at Week 16 and in those participants who did not have clinical remission at Week 16.
Median fCAL Concentrations Over Time Stratified by Week 8 Clinical Response Status	Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16	Clinical response was defined as a reduction in the PMS from baseline of \>=2 points or achieving clinical remission. Clinical remission was defined as PMS of \<= 2 with no subscore \>1. PMS consisted of 3 components: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, and physician global assessment of disease activity. Each sub score ranged from 0 (normal) to 3 (extreme severity). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 (normal) to 9 (extreme severity), where higher scores indicated more disease severity. In this outcome measure, fCAL concentration are reported at specified time points in those participants who had clinical response at Week 8 and in those participants who did not have clinical response at Week 8.
Median fCAL Concentrations Over Time Stratified by Week 16 Clinical Response Status	Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16	Clinical response was defined as a reduction in the PMS from baseline of \>=2 points or achieving clinical remission. Clinical remission was defined as PMS of \<= 2 with no subscore \>1. PMS consisted of 3 components: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, and physician global assessment of disease activity. Each sub score ranged from 0 (normal) to 3 (extreme severity). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 (normal) to 9 (extreme severity), where higher scores indicated more disease severity. In this outcome measure, fCAL concentration are reported at specified time points in those participants who had clinical response at Week 16 and in those participants who did not have clinical response at Week 16.

Trial Locations

Locations (5): Kantonsspital St, Gallen
🇨🇭
St. Gallen, Sankt Gallen, Switzerland
Clarunis, Universitätsspital
🇨🇭
Basel, Switzerland
Verein IBD Study Group
🇨🇭
Bern, Switzerland
Centre Fribourgeois de Gastroenterologie
🇨🇭
Fribourg, Switzerland
Kantonsspital Baselland
🇨🇭
Liestal, Switzerland