MedPath

Remote Monitoring in Cancer Care: a Platform Study

Active, not recruiting
Conditions
Hematopoietic and Lymphoid Cell Neoplasm
Lung Carcinoma
Malignant Digestive System Neoplasm
Head and Neck Carcinoma
Malignant Solid Neoplasm
Interventions
Other: Computer-Assisted Intervention
Procedure: Patient Monitoring
Other: Questionnaire Administration
Registration Number
NCT05018208
Lead Sponsor
Mayo Clinic
Brief Summary

This study investigates a device that closely monitors vital signs, as well as a smartphone application (app) that allows patients to respond to different questions and tests that will monitor for new symptoms. This study may help researchers understand if wearing the device is a better tool than standard vital sign assessment tools done only while at the doctor's office or hospital, and if using the smartphone app is a better tool than standard assessment tools used while in the doctor's office or hospital.

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. Develop patient-specific algorithms to predict the trajectory of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and or neurotoxicity and time to escalation of medical intervention is needed. (Arm 1) II. Establish the validity for the use of mobile technology to assess neurologic symptoms remotely. (Arm 1) III. Compare the time to escalation of potential medical intervention between remote monitoring (RM) and standard care (SC) based on retrospective analysis of clinical trial data. (Arm 1) IV. Establish the feasibility for the use of wearable device for continuous, remote monitoring of physiologic parameters by quantifying false alerts and downstream clinical actions. (Arm 1) V. Define the range of physiologic variables associated with receipt of radiation and chemotherapy. (Arm 2) VI. Correlate PROs and physician rated CTCAE to biologic parameters. (Arm 2) VII. Establish the feasibility for the use of wearable device for continuous, remote monitoring of physiologic parameters by quantifying false alerts and downstream clinical actions. (Arm 2)

OUTLINE:

ARM 1: Patients undergoing CAR-T therapy use the Biofourmis wearable device(s) and smartphone app to answer a series of questions about health and neurologic symptoms a few times a day for 5 weeks.

ARM 2: Patients undergoing radiation therapy (RT) for head and neck, lung, or gastrointestinal cancers use the Biofourmis wearable device(s) for 60 to 90 days after completion of RT. Patients also use the smartphone app to answer a series of questions about health and neurologic symptoms before start of RT, after completion of RT, 3 months after completion of RT, and 1 year after completion of RT. In addition, patients complete weekly questionnaires regarding side effects and tolerance of the device.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
100
Inclusion Criteria
  • ARM 1: Age >= 18 years
  • ARM 1: Provide written informed consent
  • ARM 1: Patients undergoing commercial CAR-T cell therapy in an outpatient setting
  • ARM 2: Age >= 18 years
  • ARM 2: Provide written informed consent
  • ARM 2: Patients with a plan to undergo radiation therapy for lung, gastrointestinal, or head and neck cancer
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  • ARM 1: Non-English speaking
  • ARM 1: Planned initiation of lymphodepleting chemotherapy in the inpatient setting
  • ARM 2: Non-English speaking
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Arm 1 (wearable device[s], smartphone app)Computer-Assisted InterventionPatients undergoing CAR-T therapy use the Biofourmis wearable device(s) and smartphone app to answer a series of questions about health and neurologic symptoms a few times a day for 5 weeks.
Arm 2 (wearable device[s], smartphone app, questionnaires)Questionnaire AdministrationPatients undergoing radiation therapy (RT) for head and neck, lung, or gastrointestinal cancers use the Biofourmis wearable device(s) for 90 days after completion of RT. Patients also use the smartphone app to answer a series of questions about health and neurologic symptoms before start of RT, after completion of RT, 3 months after completion of RT, and 1 year after completion of RT. In addition, patients complete weekly questionnaires regarding side effects and tolerance of the device.
Arm 2 (wearable device[s], smartphone app, questionnaires)Computer-Assisted InterventionPatients undergoing radiation therapy (RT) for head and neck, lung, or gastrointestinal cancers use the Biofourmis wearable device(s) for 90 days after completion of RT. Patients also use the smartphone app to answer a series of questions about health and neurologic symptoms before start of RT, after completion of RT, 3 months after completion of RT, and 1 year after completion of RT. In addition, patients complete weekly questionnaires regarding side effects and tolerance of the device.
Arm 1 (wearable device[s], smartphone app)Patient MonitoringPatients undergoing CAR-T therapy use the Biofourmis wearable device(s) and smartphone app to answer a series of questions about health and neurologic symptoms a few times a day for 5 weeks.
Arm 2 (wearable device[s], smartphone app, questionnaires)Patient MonitoringPatients undergoing radiation therapy (RT) for head and neck, lung, or gastrointestinal cancers use the Biofourmis wearable device(s) for 90 days after completion of RT. Patients also use the smartphone app to answer a series of questions about health and neurologic symptoms before start of RT, after completion of RT, 3 months after completion of RT, and 1 year after completion of RT. In addition, patients complete weekly questionnaires regarding side effects and tolerance of the device.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of remote monitoring-based CRS detection/ prediction (Arm 1)Up to 5 weeks
Assessment of neurotoxicity via digital capture of neurological assessment (Arm 1)Up to 5 weeks

Will assess agreement and concordance between assessment of neurotoxicity via digital capture of neurological assessment (ICE) as compared to standard in-person assessment.

BF-Mayo Neuro test (Arm 1)Up to 5 weeks

Will assess agreement and concordance between BF-Mayo Neuro test and ICE-based assessment of neurotoxicity.

Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of novel digital neurotoxicity tests (BF-Neuro) (Arm 1)Up to 5 weeks

Will compare to standard in-person ICE based neurotoxicity assessment.

Range of physiologic variables associated with receipt of radiation and chemotherapy (Arm 2)Up to 1 year
Quantification of false alerts and downstream clinical actions (Arm 2)Up to 1 year

Will be used for the establishment of the feasibility for the use of wearable device for continuous, remote monitoring of physiologic parameters.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Biovital index (Arm 1)Up to 5 weeks

Will assess correlation between Biovital index and BF-Mayo Neuro Test and adverse clinical events. Both continuous variables (physiologic parameters) and categorical variables (events) will be used to generate a mixed effects logistic regression model with repeated measures. The goal is to identify patterns of changes in the continuous data associated with either clinically relevant or significant events.

Point-in-time assessment of physiological signals from standard of care devices (Arm 1)Up to 5 weeks

Will assess agreement and concordance from wearable vs. standard of care devices. ICC and Bland-Altman methods will be used for agreement and concordance analysis of the remote monitor reading compared to the "gold standard" standard of care devices.

BF-Mayo Neuro Test (Arm 1)Up to 5 weeks

Will assess correlation between Biovital index and BF-Mayo Neuro Test and adverse clinical events. Both continuous variables (physiologic parameters) and categorical variables (events) will be used to generate a mixed effects logistic regression model with repeated measures. The goal is to identify patterns of changes in the continuous data associated with either clinically relevant or significant events.

Point-in-time assessment of physiological signals from wearable devices (Arm 1)Up to 5 weeks

Will assess agreement and concordance from wearable vs. standard of care devices. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Bland-Altman methods will be used for agreement and concordance analysis of the remote monitor reading compared to the "gold standard" standard of care devices.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Mayo Clinic in Rochester

🇺🇸

Rochester, Minnesota, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath