MedPath

Comparison of Propofol-fentanyl and Midazolam-fentanyl for Conscious Sedation

Phase 4
Conditions
Emergencies
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT01749579
Lead Sponsor
Tehran University of Medical Sciences
Brief Summary

Sixty patients who refer to the emergency ward and need any painful procedure in the ward are randomized into 2 groups. One group is sedated before the procedure using propofol-fentanyl and the other with midazolam-fentanyl, with the same depth of sedation. The two groups will be compared regarding recovery time and other parameters described below.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
60
Inclusion Criteria
  • age more than 18
  • candidate for a painful procedure
  • negative past history of a serious medical condition
  • ASA score 0 and 1
Exclusion Criteria
  • deep sedation making the patient unable to answer the questions
  • pregnancy
  • allergy to drugs
  • hemodynamic instability
  • failure to consent

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
PropofolFentanylThe patients will receive propofol for sedation in addition to fentanyl
MidazolamMidazolamThe patients will receive midazolam for sedation in addition to fentanyl
MidazolamFentanylThe patients will receive midazolam for sedation in addition to fentanyl
PropofolPropofolThe patients will receive propofol for sedation in addition to fentanyl
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Recovery timeWithin one hour after sedation

Length of time before complete recovery from sedation is achieved

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Patients' Pain perceptionWithin one hour after sedation

Pain perception as measured by verbal numeric rating scale

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Imam Khomeini Hospital

🇮🇷

Tehran, Iran, Islamic Republic of

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath