Task-specific Training for Patients With Acute Exacerbation of COPD

Not Applicable

Not yet recruiting

• Conditions: Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
• Interventions: Behavioral: Task-specific training; Other: Usual care

• Registration Number: NCT06224075
• Lead Sponsor: Universidad de Granada

Brief Summary

Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) experience a progressive deterioration in their quality of life. Task-specific training is a type of approach focused on chronic patients that allows the acquisition of new skills or improvement of lost skills. The overall objective of this project is to evaluate the effectiveness of a task-specific training program during hospitalization of patients with acute exacerbation of COPD. A randomized clinical trial will be conducted in patients hospitalized for COPD. Participants after signing informed consent will be randomized between the control group (standard treatment) and the intervention group (task-specific training program in addition to standard treatment). The task-specific training program is a multidisciplinary program divided into three blocks where specific tasks will be performed on symptom education, education of activities of daily living and improvement of physical capacity with the aim of reinforcing skills necessary for the self-management of COPD patients in the short, medium and long term.

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Status Verified: 2024-01
• Study First Submitted: 2024-01-12
• Study Start: 2024-01-15
• Study First Submitted QC: 2024-01-24
• Last Update Submitted: 2024-01-24
• Study First Posted: 2024-01-25
• Last Update Posted: 2024-01-25
• Primary Completion: 2024-07-15
• Study Completion: 2024-08-15

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 68

Inclusion Criteria

• Patients hospitalized for acute exacerbation of COPD.
• Over 18 years of age.
• Who wish to participate in the study.
• Who sign the informed consent form.

Read More

Exclusion Criteria

• Patients with inability to provide informed consent.
• Presence of psychiatric or cognitive disorders, organ failure, cancer and/or inability to cooperate.
• Patients who had experienced exacerbation of COPD in the previous month were also excluded.

Read More

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
Task-specific training	Usual care	-
Usual care	Usual care	-
Task-specific training	Task-specific training	-

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Knowledge Questionnaire (COPD-Q)	Baseline, 1 months and 6 months	Evaluated at baseline by Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Questionnaire (COPD-Q). COPD knowledge was evaluated using the Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Knowledge Questionnaire (COPD-Q; Maples, Franks, Ray, Stevens, \& Wallace, 2010). The COPD-Q is a valid, readable, and reliable 13-item (each one score 0 to 3) self-administered true/false questionnaire assessing COPD knowledge in patients with low health literacy skills. A higher punctuation indicates better results.
COPD Assessment Test (CAT)	Baseline, hospital discharge, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months	It consists of eight questions covering cough, phlegm, chest tightness, breathlessness, activity limitations at home, confidence leaving home, sleep and energy. The items are graded from 0 to 5, giving a total score range from 0 to 40, where lower scores indicate fewer symptoms and a better quality of life.
Modified Borg Scale	Baseline, hospital discharge, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months	the perceived dyspnoea is measure with the Borg Scale. This scale range from 0-10 where higher value indicate worse state, more dyspnoea.
EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D)	Baseline, hospital discharge, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months	Changes in quality of life were measured using the Euroqol 5dimensions which comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems. It also includes a visual analogue scale to report the health status from 0 to 100. Higher score indicate higher quality of life. Better.
Test of Adherence to Inhalers (TAI)	Baseline, hospital discharge, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months	This questionnaire has two forms, the first type being a 10-item to identify the patient's adherence status to inhalers. There are 2 other questions to check the degree of compliance. The 10-item form is scored from 1 (the poorest) to 5(the best) for each item, and the total score of the questionnaire ranges from 10 to 50 (a score of 45 or less indicates poor adherence, 46 to 49 is intermediate adherence, and 50 indicates good adherence

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Pressure expiratory force (PEF)	Baseline and hospital discharge	Changes from baseline to post-intervention in PEF were assessed using a peak flow
Forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1)	Baseline and hospital discharge	Changes from baseline to postintervention in FEV1vas evaluated by a spirometer.
Postural evaluation	Baseline and hospital discharge	Using photometry with anatomical landmarks established in this population
Pressure inspiratory force (PIF)	Baseline and hospital discharge	Changes from baseline to post-intervention in PEF were assessed using a check-dial.
Technique of the inhaler	Baseline and hospital discharge	The evaluation of the technique of the inhalers was carried out by means of a checklist composed of 5 items. Checked those points that were done correctly obtaining 5 points if the technique that was done correctly.
Fatigue Severity	Baseline, hospital discharge, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months	The perceived pain and Fatigue are measured with a Visual Analogue Scale from 0 to10, where 0 indicate no presence of pain or fatigue, and 10 indicate worst fatigue or pain.
Patient activation measure (PAM)	Baseline, 1 month and 6 months	The Patient Activation Measure-13 (PAM-13) is a concise assessment tool designed to evaluate an individual's knowledge, skills, and confidence in managing their own healthcare. Comprising 13 items, this self-report questionnaire helps healthcare professionals and researchers gauge a patient's level of activation and engagement in their healthcare journey. Respondents answer a series of questions related to their health-related knowledge, confidence in managing their health, and their proactivity in seeking healthcare information and making informed decisions. The score range from 13 to 52. Higher PAM-13 scores indicate a higher level of patient activation, which is often associated with better health outcomes and more effective self-management of chronic conditions.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Faculty of Health Sciences. University of Granada.; 🇪🇸 Granada., Granada, Spain