Characteristic Analysis and Surgical Exploration for Acetabular Roof Fractures: Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study

Withdrawn

• Conditions: Acetabular Fracture
• Interventions: Procedure: KL, Iliofemoral, Ilioinguinal, Iliac fossa and combined approaches

• Registration Number: NCT06238804
• Lead Sponsor: Hebei Medical University Third Hospital

Brief Summary

Acetabular roof was a crucial structure for maintaining the stability of hip joint; however, its important role was not especially emphasized in the Letournel-Judet classification system. Acetabular roof was segmented into the roof column and roof wall in Three-column classification and fracture in this area alone was defined as A3 injury. Radiographic data and functional outcome of A3 injury patients were reviewed to explore the characteristics and surgical strategy.

Detailed Description

Fracture data, surgical incision, operation time, blood loss, fracture healing， Reduction quality，functional outcome，and relevant complications

Study Timeline

• Study Start: 2024-01-01
• Study First Submitted: 2024-01-23
• Study First Submitted QC: 2024-01-31
• Study First Posted: 2024-02-02
• Status Verified: 2024-04
• Last Update Submitted: 2024-04-07
• Last Update Posted: 2024-04-09
• Primary Completion: 2024-05-01
• Study Completion: 2024-05-01

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: WITHDRAWN
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: Not specified

Inclusion Criteria

• 18-80 years, acute (<14 days) closed roof column/wall acetabular fractures (A3.1, A3.2 or A3.3) in Three-column classification, normal activity of the affected hip before the injury, received surgical reduction and internal fixation

Exclusion Criteria

• open fractures, pathologic fractures, limited range of motion (ROM) of the hip joint before the injury, conservative treatment, risk factors affecting bone healing (such as smoking and metabolic diseases) and noncompletion of the two-year follow-up

Study & Design

• Study Type: OBSERVATIONAL
• Study Design: Not specified

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
fracture types	KL, Iliofemoral, Ilioinguinal, Iliac fossa and combined approaches	A3.1, A3.2, A3.3

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
postoperative outcome	4 months	Merle d'Aubigné score, fracture healing, reduction quality, etc

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
complication	1 month	wound infection, iatrogenic injury of vessels and nerves, etc

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Hebei Medical University Third Hospital; 🇨🇳 Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China