Implementing an Individualized Pain Plan (IPP) for ED Treatment of VOE's in Sickle Cell Disease

Not Applicable

Completed

• Conditions: Sickle Cell Disease; Hematologic Diseases; Anemia, Sickle Cell; Genetic Disease
• Interventions: Other: Electronic Health Record (EHR) Embedded Individualized Pain Plan (IPP)

• Registration Number: NCT04584528
• Lead Sponsor: Duke University

Brief Summary

The overall purpose of this proposed study is to improve management of vaso-occlusive episodes (VOEs) in adult EDs. We aim to implement NHLBI recommendations for VOE treatment by embedding Individualized Pain Plans (IPPs) in the electronic health record (EHR). The EHR-embedded IPP will serve as a record of patients' SCD genotype and will include analgesic medication recommendations developed by the SCD provider. In this project, we will provide access to the IPP for both adult patients with SCD and ED providers. The proposed multisite study will use a pre-post study design, with a core set of mandatory intervention components and strategies for each participating site and optional components and strategies to allow for intervention adaptation to local needs and resources. The EHR-embedded IPP will be available for all adult ED providers to use as their routine practice, and patients will be invited to participate and enroll in the study. We will use a simplified Technology Acceptance Model to explain the use of the IPP and the RE-AIM framework to assess the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance of the intervention.

Detailed Description

The study aims are as follows:

Aim 1: Assess the overall effectiveness of EHR-embedded IPPs on improving patient and provider outcomes associated with pain treatment in the adult ED setting. We will evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention on both patients and providers using a pre-post study design.

Sub-aim 1.a. To examine effectiveness of the EHR-embedded IPP on improving patients' perceived quality of ED pain treatment. We hypothesize that among enrolled patients with at least one ED VOE visit during the intervention period, the perceived quality of ED pain treatment will increase by 0.5 standard deviation (primary outcome) after an ED VOE visit when compared with the last ED VOE visits made by these patients within 90 days before enrollment. We will measure change pre- and post-intervention in secondary patient outcomes, including hospital admission rate within 12 months, ED VOE revisit rate, ED VOE readmission rate, and time to first dosage of pain medication provided in the ED.

Sub-aim 1.b. To examine the effectiveness of the EHR-embedded IPP on improving providers' self-efficacy in treating pain for patients with SCD and perceived quality of ED pain treatment. We hypothesize that the intervention will increase providers' self-efficacy in treating VOEs and managing pain for patients with SCD when compared with self-efficacy before the intervention. We will also explore the effect of the intervention on ED providers' perceived quality of ED pain treatment.

Aim 2: Assess the reach, adoption, implementation, and maintenance of the EHR-embedded IPP components and implementation strategies at each participating site. We will use the RE-AIM framework to evaluate intervention outcomes in addition to intervention effectiveness.

Sub-aim 2.a. To assess the reach of the EHR-embedded IPP. We will assess the reach of the intervention at the patient level by examining the proportion of patients enrolled in the study among all patients the team has reached out to recruit, and at the clinic level by examining the proportion of clinics participating in the intervention.

Sub-aim 2.b. To assess the adoption and implementation of the EHR-embedded IPP and track implementation strategies adopted by each site. We will assess the adoption of the intervention by examining characteristics of individual EDs that participate relative to the number of individual EDs affiliated with each study site who could have been recruited. We will assess implementation fidelity and outcomes, such as the proportion of eligible hematologists and nurse practitioners who receive IPP training, number of IPPs written and included in the EHR, required and optional intervention elements that are implemented as planned, IPP use by patients and providers, provider IPP adherence, and patients' and providers' perceived ease of use of the IPPs. We will track and report strategies used by participating sites through both quantitative data collection and qualitative interviews.

Sub-aim 2.c. To assess the intent to continue using the IPP from a multi-stakeholder perspective. We will assess patients' and providers' intent to continue using the IPP during the implementation period. At the end of the intervention, we will assess ED administrators' intent to continue using the IPP.

Aim 3: Assess organizational readiness at the beginning of the implementation and barriers and facilitators to the use of EHR-embedded IPPs. We will perform a Readiness Assessment to measure organization- and staff-level readiness at the beginning of the intervention to inform the selection and adaptation of implementation strategies. We will assess facilitators and barriers in adopting and implementing the IPPs from multiple stakeholder perspectives: patients, providers, and ED administrators.

Embedding IPPs in the EHR that are accessible to both ED providers and patients is a promising intervention to support the NHLBI evidence-based recommendations to guide treatment of VOE in the ED setting and improve quality of pain treatment in the ED and better patient outcomes. If EHR-embedded IPPs implemented and evaluated in this study show preliminary effectiveness, they could be scaled up within SCDIC Centers and expanded to other institutions outside the SCDIC. The results of this proposed study will accelerate the uptake of the NHLBI recommendation and establish standardized treatment in EDs for patients with SCD.

Basic Information
|
Recruitment & Eligibility
|
Study & Design
|
Trial Locations

Study Timeline

• Study First Submitted: 2020-10-06
• Study First Submitted QC: 2020-10-06
• Study First Posted: 2020-10-14
• Study Start: 2020-10-27
• Primary Completion: 2022-09-20
• Status Verified: 2022-10
• Study Completion: 2022-10-01
• Last Update Submitted: 2022-10-26
• Last Update Posted: 2022-10-28

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: COMPLETED
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 279

Inclusion Criteria

• Age 18 years up to and including 45 years
• English speaking
• Confirmed SCD diagnoses . Confirmed is defined as supported by documentation in the medical record of a positive test for one of the following : Hb SS, Hb SC, Hb S -thalassemia, Hb SO, Hb SD, Hb SG, Hb SE, or Hb SF.
• Access to a cellular/mobile smart phone with access to text messaging (either Android or iPhone acceptable) .
• At least one Vaso-Occlusive Episode (VOE) visit to participating site Emergency Department (ED) the past 90 days from enrollment
• At least one visit at the study site sickle cell disease clinic within the past 12 months
• Willing and cognitively able to give informed consent

Patient Exclusion criteria:

• Patient's sickle cell provider states patient should not have a protocol or should not be administered opioids

Provider Inclusion Criteria:

• Provides pain treatment in one of the participating study Emergency Departments for a patient participant with a qualified ED visit .

Read More

Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Read More

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: SEQUENTIAL

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
EHR-embedded Individualized Pain Plan (IPP)	Electronic Health Record (EHR) Embedded Individualized Pain Plan (IPP)	The EHR embedded IPP will be made accessible to patients and ED providers at each study site.

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Change in Patient-perceived quality of ED pain treatment.	Baseline, 96 hours	Three questions from the Adult Sickle Cell Quality of Life Measure (ASCQ-Me) and Quality of Care (QOC) measure will be used to measure the patient perceived quality of ED pain treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Hospital readmission rate measured by EHR retrieval	Day 30
Time to first dose of pain medication measured by EHR retrieval	Baseline
ED revisit rate as measured by EHR retrieval	Day 30

Trial Locations

Locations (8)

University of Illinois; 🇺🇸 Chicago, Illinois, United States

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai; 🇺🇸 New York, New York, United States

St. Jude's; 🇺🇸 Memphis, Tennessee, United States

University of California San Francisco; 🇺🇸 Oakland, California, United States

Georgia Regents University; 🇺🇸 Augusta, Georgia, United States

Washington University; 🇺🇸 Saint Louis, Missouri, United States

Duke University; 🇺🇸 Durham, North Carolina, United States

Medical University of South Carolina; 🇺🇸 Charleston, South Carolina, United States