Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT07480148
NCT07480148
Active, not recruiting
Not Applicable

Self-activated Leaf Expander Versus William's Expander in Expansion of Collapsed Mandibular Arch: A Prospective Clinical Trail

Al-Azhar University1 site in 1 country16 target enrollmentStarted: June 15, 2024Last updated:

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Active, not recruiting
Enrollment
16
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Intercanine width

Overview

Brief Summary

Self-activated leaf expander versus William's expander in expansion of collapsed mandibular arch

Detailed Description

The current randomized clinical study will be directed to compare the selfactivated leaf expander to William's expander for the expansion of collapsed mandibular arch.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Screening
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
12 Years to 16 Years (Child)
Sex
Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • An age from 12-16 years.
  • Low to average facial vertical pattern.
  • A mild to moderate crowding in mandibular arch with reduced transverse dimension which require non extraction orthodontic approach.
  • Similar amount of crowding on each side of the mandibular arch.
  • No previous orthodontic treatment.
  • Good oral and general health.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Severe crowding.
  • Steep mandibular plane.
  • Asymmetric crowding on both sides of the arch.
  • Shifting of mandibular dental midline.
  • Impacted lower 2nd premolar.

Arms & Interventions

william's expander

Active Comparator

Eight patients will be treated with William's expander, where the arms of expander will be placed parallel to the line of occlusion at the middle of lingual surface of the anterior teeth with two bands on lower permanent first molars.

Intervention: williams's expander (Device)

self activated leaf expander

Active Comparator

Eight patients will be treated by self-activated leaf expander that does not need activation by the patient.

Intervention: self activated leaf expander (Device)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Intercanine width

Time Frame: 6 months

comparing the selfactivated leaf expander to William's expander for the expansion of collapsed lower arch by CBCT mandibular arch.

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Abdalla Kamal

doctor

Al-Azhar University

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials