MedPath

A Study of JNJ-77242113 for the Treatment of Participants With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis

Phase 3
Active, not recruiting
Conditions
Plaque Psoriasis
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT06143878
Lead Sponsor
Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Brief Summary

The purpose of the study is to see how effective JNJ-77242113 is in participants with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis compared to placebo and deucravacitinib.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
774
Inclusion Criteria
  • Diagnosis of plaque psoriasis, with or without psoriatic arthritis (PsA), for at least 26 weeks prior to the first administration of study intervention
  • Total body surface area (BSA) greater than or equal to (>=)10 percent (%) at screening and baseline
  • Total psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) >=12 at screening and baseline
  • Total investigator global assessment (IGA) >=3 at screening and baseline
  • Candidate for phototherapy or systemic treatment for plaque psoriasis
Exclusion Criteria
  • Nonplaque form of psoriasis (for example, erythrodermic, guttate, or pustular)
  • Current drug-induced psoriasis (for example, a new onset of psoriasis or an exacerbation of psoriasis from beta blockers, calcium channel blockers, or lithium)
  • A current diagnosis or signs or symptoms of severe, progressive, or uncontrolled renal, liver, cardiac, vascular, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, endocrine, neurologic, hematologic, rheumatologic, psychiatric, or metabolic disturbances
  • Known allergies, hypersensitivity, or intolerance to JNJ-77242113, deucravacitinib, or to any of the excipients or components of the study intervention
  • Major surgical procedure, (for example, requiring general anesthesia) within 8 weeks before screening, or will not have fully recovered from surgical procedure, or has a surgical procedure planned during the time the participant is expected to participate in the study

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
PlaceboDeucravacitinib Matching PlaceboParticipants will receive matching placebo for JNJ-77242113 from Week 0 through Week 16, matching placebo for deucravacitinib from Week 0 through Week 24 and JNJ-77242113 from Week 16 through Week 156.
JNJ-77242113Deucravacitinib Matching PlaceboParticipants will receive JNJ-77242113 from Week 0 through Week 156 and deucravacitinib matching placebo from Week 0 through Week 24.
PlaceboJNJ-77242113 Matching PlaceboParticipants will receive matching placebo for JNJ-77242113 from Week 0 through Week 16, matching placebo for deucravacitinib from Week 0 through Week 24 and JNJ-77242113 from Week 16 through Week 156.
DeucravacitinibJNJ-77242113Participants will receive deucravacitinib from Week 0 through Week 24 and matching placebo for JNJ-77242113 from Week 0 through Week 24 and JNJ-77242113 from Week 24 through Week 156.
DeucravacitinibDeucravacitinibParticipants will receive deucravacitinib from Week 0 through Week 24 and matching placebo for JNJ-77242113 from Week 0 through Week 24 and JNJ-77242113 from Week 24 through Week 156.
JNJ-77242113JNJ-77242113Participants will receive JNJ-77242113 from Week 0 through Week 156 and deucravacitinib matching placebo from Week 0 through Week 24.
DeucravacitinibJNJ-77242113 Matching PlaceboParticipants will receive deucravacitinib from Week 0 through Week 24 and matching placebo for JNJ-77242113 from Week 0 through Week 24 and JNJ-77242113 from Week 24 through Week 156.
PlaceboJNJ-77242113Participants will receive matching placebo for JNJ-77242113 from Week 0 through Week 16, matching placebo for deucravacitinib from Week 0 through Week 24 and JNJ-77242113 from Week 16 through Week 156.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
JNJ-77242113 and Placebo Group: Percentage of Participants Achieving an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of 0 or 1 and Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline to Week 16Baseline and Week 16

Percentage of participants who achieve an IGA score of 0 or 1 and \>=2-Grade improvement from baseline to Week 16 will be reported. The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participants psoriasis at a given time point. Overall lesions are graded for induration, erythema, and scaling. The participant's psoriasis is assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4).

JNJ-77242113 and Placebo Group: Percentage of Participants Achieving Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 90 Response at Week 16Baseline and Week 16

Percentage of participants achieving PASI 90 response (\>=90% improvement in PASI from baseline) at Week 16 will be reported. The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 and extent of involvement on a scale of 0 to 6. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
JNJ-77242113 and Placebo Group: Percentage of Participants Achieving an IGA Score of 0 at Week 16Week 16

Percentage of participants who achieve an IGA score of 0 at Week 16 will be reported. The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participants psoriasis at a given time point. Overall lesions are graded for induration, erythema, and scaling. The participant's psoriasis is assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4).

JNJ-77242113 and Placebo Group: Percentage of Participants Achieving PASI 75 Response From Baseline to Weeks 4 and 16Baseline, Week 4, and Week 16

Percentage of participants achieving PASI 75 response (\>=75% improvement in PASI from baseline) at Weeks 4 and 16 will be reported. The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 and extent of involvement on a scale of 0 to 6. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease.

JNJ-77242113 and Placebo Group: Percentage of Participants Achieving PASI 90 Response at Week 8Baseline and Week 8

Percentage of participants achieving PASI 90 response (\>=90% improvement in PASI from baseline) at Week 8 will be reported. The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 and extent of involvement on a scale of 0 to 6. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease.

JNJ-77242113 and Placebo Group: Percentage of Participants Achieving PASI 100 Response at Week 16Baseline and Week 16

Percentage of participants achieving PASI 100 response (100% improvement in PASI from baseline) at Week 16 will be reported. The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 and extent of involvement on a scale of 0 to 6. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease.

JNJ-77242113 and Placebo Group: Percentage of Participants Achieving Scalp-specific Investigator Global Assessment (ss-IGA) Score of 0 or 1 and >=2 Grade Improvement From Baseline at Week 16Baseline and Week 16

Percentage of participants achieving ss-IGA score of 0 or 1 and \>=2 grade improvement from baseline to Week 16 will be reported. The ss-IGA instrument is used to evaluate the disease severity of scalp psoriasis. The lesions are assessed in terms of the clinical signs of redness, thickness, and scaliness which are scored as: absence of disease (0), very mild disease (1), mild disease (2), moderate disease (3), and severe disease (4).

JNJ-77242113 and Deucravacitinib Group: Percentage of Participants Achieving PASI 90 Response at Weeks 16 and 24Baseline, Week 16, and Week 24

Percentage of participants achieving PASI 90 response (\>=90% improvement in PASI from baseline) at Weeks 16 and 24 will be reported. The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 and extent of involvement on a scale of 0 to 6. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease.

Number of Participants with Adverse Events (AEs)Up to 165 weeks

An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical event that occurs in a participant administered an investigational product, and it does not necessarily indicate only events with clear causal relationship with the relevant investigational product.

JNJ-77242113 and Placebo Group: Change From Baseline in PSSD Symptom Score at Week 16Baseline and Week 16

Change from baseline in PSSD symptom score at Week 16 will be reported. The PSSD includes PRO questionnaire designed to measure the severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs over the previous 7 days for the assessment of treatment benefit. The PSSD is a self-administered PRO instrument that includes 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning, and skin tightness) and patient-observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness, and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Two sub scores will be derived each ranging from 0 to 100: the psoriasis symptom score and the psoriasis sign score. A higher score indicates more severe disease.

JNJ-77242113 and Deucravacitinib Group: Percentage of Participants Achieving an IGA Score of 0 at Weeks 16 and 24Weeks 16 and 24

Percentage of participants who achieve an IGA score of 0 at Weeks 16 and 24 will be reported. The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participants psoriasis at a given time point. Overall lesions are graded for induration, erythema, and scaling. The participant's psoriasis is assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4).

JNJ-77242113 and Placebo Group: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Physician's Global Assessment of Hands and Feet (hf-PGA) Score of 0 or 1 and at Least a 2-grade Improvement From Baseline to Week 16Baseline and Week 16

Percentage of participants achieving a hf-PGA score of 0 or 1 and at least a 2-grade improvement from baseline to Week 16 will be reported. The hf-PGA assesses the severity of hand and foot psoriasis using a 5-point scale to score the plaques on the hands and feet as: clear (0), almost clear (1), mild (2), moderate (3), and severe (4).

JNJ-77242113 and Placebo Group: Change From Baseline in Total DLQI Score at Week 16Baseline and Week 16

Change from baseline in total DLQI score at Week 16 will be reported. The DLQI is a dermatology specific HRQoL instrument designed to assess the impact of the disease on a participant's HRQoL. It is a 10-item questionnaire that assesses HRQoL over the past week and in addition to evaluating overall HRQoL, can be used to assess 6 different aspects that may affect quality of life: symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school performance, personal relationships, and treatment. The total score ranges from 0 to 30 with a higher score indicating greater impact on HRQoL.

JNJ-77242113 and Placebo Group: Percentage of Participants Achieving Psoriasis Symptom and Signs Diary (PSSD) Symptom Score of 0 at Weeks 8 and 16Weeks 8 and 16

Percentage of participants achieving PSSD symptom score of 0 at Weeks 8 and 16 will be reported. The PSSD includes patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaire designed to measure the severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs over the previous 7 days for the assessment of treatment benefit. The PSSD is a self-administered PRO instrument that includes 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning, and skin tightness) and patient-observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness, and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Two sub scores will be derived each ranging from 0 to 100: the psoriasis symptom score and the psoriasis sign score. A higher score indicates more severe disease.

JNJ-77242113 and Deucravacitinib Group: Percentage of Participants Achieving PASI 75 Response at Weeks 16 and 24Baseline, Week 16 and Week 24

Percentage of participants achieving PASI 75 response (\>=75% improvement in PASI from baseline) at Weeks 16 and 24 will be reported. The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 and extent of involvement on a scale of 0 to 6. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease.

JNJ-77242113 and Deucravacitinib Group: Percentage of Participants Achieving PASI 100 Response at Weeks 16 and 24Baseline, Week 16, and Week 24

Percentage of participants achieving PASI 100 response (100% improvement in PASI from baseline) at Weeks 16 and 24 will be reported. The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 and extent of involvement on a scale of 0 to 6. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease.

JNJ-77242113 and Placebo Group: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Static Physician's Global Assessment of Genitalia (sPGA-G) Score of 0 or 1 and at Least a 2-grade Improvement From Baseline to Week 16Baseline and Week 16

Percentage of participants achieving a sPGA-G Score of 0 or 1 and at least a 2-grade improvement from baseline to Week 16 will be reported. The sPGA-G is a 6-point scale to assess the severity of genital psoriasis at a given time point. The sPGA-G evaluates erythema, plaque elevation, and scale of genital psoriatic lesions. The severity of genital psoriasis is assessed as clear (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), severe (4), and very severe (5).

JNJ-77242113 and Placebo Group: Change From Baseline in PSSD Sign Score at Week 16Baseline and Week 16

Change from baseline in PSSD sign score at Week 16 will be reported. The PSSD includes PRO questionnaire designed to measure the severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs over the previous 7 days for the assessment of treatment benefit. The PSSD is a self-administered PRO instrument that includes 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning, and skin tightness) and patient-observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness, and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Two sub scores will be derived each ranging from 0 to 100: the psoriasis symptom score and the psoriasis sign score. A higher score indicates more severe disease.

JNJ-77242113 and Placebo Group: Percentage of Participants Achieving >=4 Point Improvement From Baseline in PSSD Itch Score at Weeks 4 and 16Baseline, Week 4, and Week 16

Percentage of participants achieving \>=4 Point improvement from baseline in PSSD itch score at Weeks 4 and 16 will be reported. The PSSD includes PRO questionnaire designed to measure the severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs over the previous 7 days for the assessment of treatment benefit. The PSSD is a self-administered PRO instrument that includes 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning, and skin tightness) and patient-observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness, and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Two sub scores will be derived each ranging from 0 to 100: the psoriasis symptom score and the psoriasis sign score. A higher score indicates more severe disease.

JNJ-77242113 and Deucravacitinib Group: Percentage of Participants Achieving an IGA Score of 0 or 1 and >=2 Grade Improvement From Baseline at Weeks 16 and 24Baseline, Week 16, and Week 24

Percentage of participants who achieve an IGA score of 0 or 1 and \>=2 grade improvement from baseline at Weeks 16 and 24 will be reported. The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participants psoriasis at a given time point. Overall lesions are graded for induration, erythema, and scaling. The participant's psoriasis is assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4).

JNJ-77242113 and Deucravacitinib Group: Percentage of Participants With PSSD Symptom Score of 0 at Week 16Week 16

Percentage of participants achieving PSSD symptom score 0 at Week 16 will be reported. The PSSD includes PRO questionnaire designed to measure the severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs over the previous 7 days for the assessment of treatment benefit. The PSSD is a self-administered PRO instrument that includes 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning, and skin tightness) and patient-observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness, and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Two sub scores will be derived each ranging from 0 to 100: the psoriasis symptom score and the psoriasis sign score. A higher score indicates more severe disease.

Number of Participants with Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Up to 165 weeks

SAEs are any AE which results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, is a suspected transmission of any infectious agent via a medicinal product, or is medically important.

Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) at Week 16Baseline and Week 16

Change from baseline in BSA at Week 16 will be reported. BSA is a commonly used measure of extent of skin disease. It is defined as the percentage of surface area of the body involved with the condition being assessed (that is, plaque psoriasis).

Percent Improvement in PASI Score From Baseline at Week 16Baseline and Week 16

Percent improvement in PASI score from Baseline at Week 16 will be reported. The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 and extent of involvement on a scale of 0 to 6. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease.

JNJ-77242113 and Placebo Group: Percentage of Participants With PSSD Sign Score of 0 at Week 16Week 16

Percentage of participants with PSSD sign score of 0 at Week 16 will be reported. The PSSD includes PRO questionnaire designed to measure the severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs over the previous 7 days for the assessment of treatment benefit. The PSSD is a self-administered PRO instrument that includes 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning, and skin tightness) and patient-observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness, and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Two sub scores will be derived each ranging from 0 to 100: the psoriasis symptom score and the psoriasis sign score. A higher score indicates more severe disease.

JNJ-77242113 and Placebo Group: Percentage of Participants Achieving Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score of 0 or 1 at Week 16Week 16

Percentage of participants achieving DLQI score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 will be reported. The DLQI is a dermatology specific health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instrument designed to assess the impact of the disease on a participant's HRQoL. It is a 10-item questionnaire that assesses HRQoL over the past week and in addition to evaluating overall HRQoL, can be used to assess 6 different aspects that may affect quality of life: symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school performance, personal relationships, and treatment. The total score ranges from 0 to 30 with a higher score indicating greater impact on HRQoL.

Change from Baseline in PASI Total Score at Week 16Baseline and Week 16

Change from baseline in PASI total score at Week 16 will be reported. The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas are assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 and extent of involvement on a scale of 0 to 6. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease.

JNJ-77242113 and Placebo Group: Percent Change From Baseline in Modified Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (mNAPSI) Score at Week 16Baseline and Week 16

Percent change from baseline in mNAPSI score at Week 16 will be reported. The mNAPSI is an index used for assessing and grading the severity of nail psoriasis. Each of the participant's 10 fingernails are evaluated for 7 features. The first 3 features are each scored from 0 to 3 in severity and are (1) onycholysis and oil-drop dyschromia, (2) pitting, and (3) nail plate crumbling. The next 4 features are scored 0 - absent or 1 - present and are (1) leukonychia, (2) splinter hemorrhages, (3) nail bed hyperkeratosis, and (4) red spots in the lunula. The score ranges from 0 to 13 per nail and 0 to 130 for all fingernails.

JNJ-77242113 and Placebo Group: Percent of Participants Achieving Fingernail Physician's Global Assessment (f-PGA) Score of 0 or 1 at Week 16Week 16

Percent of participants achieving f-PGA score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 will be reported. The f-PGA is used to evaluate the current status of a participant's fingernail psoriasis on a scale of 0 to 4 (clear \[0\], minimal \[1\], mild \[2\], moderate \[3\], or severe \[4\]).

JNJ-77242113 and Placebo Group: Change from Baseline in Domain Scores of the Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29 (PROMIS-29) Score at Week 16Baseline and Week 16

Change from baseline in domain scores of the PROMIS-29 score at Week 16 will be reported. The PROMIS-29 is a 29-item generic HRQoL survey, assessing each of the 7 PROMIS domains (depression, anxiety, physical function, pain interference, fatigue, sleep disturbance, and ability to participate in social roles and activities) with 4 questions for each domain. The questions are ranked on a 5-point Likert scale. There is also a numerical rating scale that ranges from 0 (No pain) to 10 (Worst pain imaginable) for pain intensity. The raw domain scores are converted to standardized T-scores with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Higher scores on anxiety, depression, fatigue, sleep disturbance, and pain interference indicate more severe symptoms. Higher scores on physical function and social participation indicate better health outcomes.

JNJ-77242113 and Deucravacitinib Group: Percentage of Participants Achieving PSSD Symptom Score of 0 at Weeks 16 and 24Weeks 16 and 24

Percentage of participants achieving PSSD symptom score of 0 at Weeks 16 and 24 will be reported. The PSSD includes PRO questionnaire designed to measure the severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs over the previous 7 days for the assessment of treatment benefit. The PSSD is a self-administered PRO instrument that includes 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning, and skin tightness) and patient-observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness, and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Two sub scores will be derived each ranging from 0 to 100: the psoriasis symptom score and the psoriasis sign score. A higher score indicates more severe disease.

JNJ-77242113 and Placebo Group: Percentage of Participants Achieving Genital Psoriasis Sexual Frequency Questionnaire (GenPs-SFQ) Item 2 Score of 0 or 1 at Week 16Week 16

Percentage of participants achieving GenPs-SFQ Item 2 score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 will be reported. The GenPs-SFQ is a 2-item participant-reported instrument used to assess the impact of genital psoriasis on the frequency of sexual activity in the last 7 days. Item 1 assesses overall frequency of sexual activity in the last 7 days (none/zero, once, or 2 or more times), and item 2 assesses how frequently genital psoriasis symptoms have limited the frequency of sexual activity in the last 7 days (never \[0\], rarely \[1\], sometimes \[2\], often \[3\], or always \[4\]).

Percentage of Participants Achieving IGA Score of 0 or 1 after Week 24, Among Participants with IGA score >=2 at Week 24 in the Deucravacitinib GroupFrom Week 24 through Week 156

Percentage of participants achieving IGA score of 0 or 1 after Week 24, among participants with IGA score \>=2 at Week 24 in the deucravacitinib group will be reported. The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participants psoriasis at a given time point. Overall lesions are graded for induration, erythema, and scaling. The participant's psoriasis is assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4).

JNJ-77242113 and Deucravacitinib Group: Percentage of Participants Achieving DLQI Score of 0 or 1 at Weeks 16 and 24Weeks 16 and 24

Percentage of participants achieving DLQI score of 0 or 1 at Weeks 16 and 24 will be reported. The DLQI is a dermatology specific HRQoL instrument designed to assess the impact of the disease on a participant's HRQoL. It is a 10-item questionnaire that assesses HRQoL over the past week and in addition to evaluating overall HRQoL, can be used to assess 6 different aspects that may affect quality of life: symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school performance, personal relationships, and treatment. The total score ranges from 0 to 30 with a higher score indicating greater impact on HRQoL.

Percentage of Participants Who Achieve PASI 75 Response After Week 24 Among PASI 75 Non-responders to Deucravacitinib at Week 24Baseline and from Week 24 through Week 156

Percentage of participants who achieve PASI 75 response (\>=75% improvement in PASI) after Week 24 among PASI 75 Non-responders to deucravacitinib at Week 24 will be reported. The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 and extent of involvement on a scale of 0 to 6. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease.

Percentage of Participants Who Achieve PASI 90 Response After Week 24 Among PASI 90 Non-responders to Deucravacitinib at Week 24Baseline and from Week 24 through Week 156

Percentage of participants who achieve PASI 90 response (\>=90% improvement in PASI) after Week 24 among PASI 90 non-responders to deucravacitinib at Week 24 will be reported. The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 and extent of involvement on a scale of 0 to 6. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease.

Trial Locations

Locations (160)

SZTE AOK Szent-Gyorgyi Albert Klinikai Kozpont, Borgyogyaszati és Allergologiai Klinika

🇭🇺

Szeged, Hungary

Allergo-Derm Bakos Kft.

🇭🇺

Szolnok, Hungary

Medmare Egeszsegugyi Es Szolgaltato Bt.

🇭🇺

Veszprem, Hungary

Fukuoka University Hospital

🇯🇵

Fukuoka, Japan

Hino Dermatology Clinic

🇯🇵

Fukutsu, Japan

Gifu University Hospital

🇯🇵

Gifu, Japan

University of the Ryukyus Hospital

🇯🇵

Ginowan, Japan

Gunma University Hospital

🇯🇵

Gunma, Japan

JR Sapporo Hospital

🇯🇵

Hokkaido, Japan

Tohoku University Hospital

🇯🇵

Sendai, Japan

The University of Osaka Hospital

🇯🇵

Suita City, Japan

Jitaikai Tachikawa dermatology clinic

🇯🇵

Tachikawa, Japan

Shirasaki Dermatology Clinic

🇯🇵

Takaoka shi, Japan

Mie University Hospital

🇯🇵

Tsu, Japan

Pusan National University Hospital

🇰🇷

Busan, Korea, Republic of

Seoul National University Bundang Hospital

🇰🇷

Seongnam si, Korea, Republic of

Hosp. Univ. de La Princesa

🇪🇸

Madrid, Spain

Hosp. Univ. Infanta Leonor

🇪🇸

Madrid, Spain

Hosp. Univ. de La Paz

🇪🇸

Madrid, Spain

Hosp. Univ. I Politecni La Fe

🇪🇸

Valencia, Spain

National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin Chu Branch

🇨🇳

Hsin Chu, Taiwan

Chang Kung Memorial Hospital

🇨🇳

Kaohsiung City, Taiwan

Taipei Medical University Shuang Ho Hospital

🇨🇳

New Taipei City, Taiwan

Guys and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust

🇬🇧

London, United Kingdom

Royal Berkshire Hospital

🇬🇧

Reading, United Kingdom

Salford Royal Hospital

🇬🇧

Salford, United Kingdom

Medical Dermatology Specialists

🇺🇸

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Center for Dermatology and Plastic Surgery

🇺🇸

Scottsdale, Arizona, United States

Johnson Dermatology

🇺🇸

Fort Smith, Arkansas, United States

Skin Care Physicians of Georgia

🇺🇸

Macon, Georgia, United States

Dermatology Specialists

🇺🇸

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Dermatology and Advanced Aesthetics

🇺🇸

Lake Charles, Louisiana, United States

Tufts Medical Center

🇺🇸

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

David Fivenson MD, Dermatology

🇺🇸

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

North Eastern Health Specialists

🇦🇺

Campbelltown, Australia

Enverus Medical

🇨🇦

Surrey, British Columbia, Canada

Klinik und Poliklinik fur Dermatologie und Allergologie am Biederstein

🇩🇪

Munchen, Germany

Universitaetsmedizin Rostock

🇩🇪

Rostock, Germany

Pecsi Tudomanyegyetem

🇭🇺

Borgyogyaszati Klinika, Hungary

Obudai Egeszsegugyi Centrum Kft

🇭🇺

Budapest, Hungary

Derma-B Kft

🇭🇺

Debrecen, Hungary

Debreceni Egyetem Klinikai Kozpont

🇭🇺

Debrecen, Hungary

Somogy Varmegyei Kaposi Mor Oktato Korhaz

🇭🇺

Kaposvar, Hungary

Karma Clinical Trials Inc.

🇨🇦

St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada

Paratus Clinical Research Woden

🇦🇺

Canberra, Australia

Sinclair Dermatology

🇦🇺

East Melbourne, Australia

Skin Health Institute Inc.

🇦🇺

Melbourne, Australia

Veracity Clinical Research

🇦🇺

Woolloongabba, Australia

Fundacao do ABC Centro Universitario FMABC

🇧🇷

Santo Andre, Brazil

CCA Medical Research Corporation

🇨🇦

Ajax, Ontario, Canada

SimcoDerm Medical and Surgical Dermatology Centre

🇨🇦

Barrie, Ontario, Canada

York Dermatology Clinic and Research Centre

🇨🇦

Richmond Hill, Ontario, Canada

Dermatrials Research

🇨🇦

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Alliance Clinical Trials

🇨🇦

Waterloo, Ontario, Canada

XLR8 Medical Research

🇨🇦

Windsor, Ontario, Canada

ISA - Interdisciplinary Study Association GmbH

🇩🇪

Berlin, Germany

Hautarztpraxis

🇩🇪

Potsdam, Germany

Klinische Forschung Dresden GmbH

🇩🇪

Dresden, Germany

Praxis für Dermatologie und Venerologie

🇩🇪

Dresden, Germany

Studienzentrum Dr Schwarz Germany

🇩🇪

Langenau, Germany

Universitatsklinikum Leipzig AOR

🇩🇪

Leipzig, Germany

Universitatsklinikum Schleswig Holstein Campus Lubeck

🇩🇪

Lubeck, Germany

Universitaetsklinikum Mannheim

🇩🇪

Mannheim, Germany

Instituto de Neumonologia y Dermatologia

🇦🇷

Caba, Argentina

Hospital Italiano de La Plata

🇦🇷

La Plata, Argentina

Instituto Caici Srl.

🇦🇷

Rosario, Argentina

Centro de Investigaciones Medicas Tucuman

🇦🇷

San Miguel De Tucuman, Argentina

Driven Research LLC

🇺🇸

Coral Gables, Florida, United States

First OC Dermatology

🇺🇸

Fountain Valley, California, United States

Center for Dermatology Clinical Research

🇺🇸

Fremont, California, United States

Integrative Skin Science and Research

🇺🇸

Sacramento, California, United States

Southern California Dermatology

🇺🇸

Santa Ana, California, United States

Clinical Science Institute

🇺🇸

Santa Monica, California, United States

Ziaderm Research LLC

🇺🇸

North Miami Beach, Florida, United States

Renstar Medical Research

🇺🇸

Ocala, Florida, United States

Forcare Clinical Research Inc

🇺🇸

Tampa, Florida, United States

Hamilton Research LLC

🇺🇸

Alpharetta, Georgia, United States

DeNova Research

🇺🇸

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Arlington Dermatology

🇺🇸

Rolling Meadows, Illinois, United States

Northshore Medical Group

🇺🇸

Skokie, Illinois, United States

Dundee Dermatology

🇺🇸

West Dundee, Illinois, United States

Dawes Fretzin Clinical Research Group LLC

🇺🇸

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Indiana Clinical Trial Center

🇺🇸

Plainfield, Indiana, United States

Michigan Center of Medical Research

🇺🇸

Clarkston, Michigan, United States

Henry Ford Medical Center

🇺🇸

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Hamzavi Dermatology

🇺🇸

Fort Gratiot, Michigan, United States

MediSearch Clinical Trials

🇺🇸

Saint Joseph, Missouri, United States

Skin Specialists

🇺🇸

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Fife Dermatology

🇺🇸

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Allcutis Research

🇺🇸

Portsmouth, New Hampshire, United States

Schweiger Dermatology Group

🇺🇸

Hackensack, New Jersey, United States

Derm Research Center of New York, Inc.

🇺🇸

Stony Brook, New York, United States

Wilmington Dermatology Center

🇺🇸

Wilmington, North Carolina, United States

Oakview Dermatology

🇺🇸

Athens, Ohio, United States

Optima Research

🇺🇸

Boardman, Ohio, United States

Central Sooner Research

🇺🇸

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Oregon Medical Research Center

🇺🇸

Portland, Oregon, United States

Health Concepts

🇺🇸

Rapid City, South Dakota, United States

Modern Research Associates

🇺🇸

Dallas, Texas, United States

Center for Clinical Studies

🇺🇸

Webster, Texas, United States

Austin Institute for Clinical Research

🇺🇸

Pflugerville, Texas, United States

Progressive Clinical Research

🇺🇸

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Texas Dermatology and Laser Specialists

🇺🇸

San Antonio, Texas, United States

National Clinical Research

🇺🇸

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Frontier Derm Partners CRO, LLC

🇺🇸

Mill Creek, Washington, United States

Premier Clinical Research

🇺🇸

Spokane, Washington, United States

Instituto Medico De Alta Complejidad (IMAC)

🇦🇷

Buenos Aires, Argentina

ARCIS Salud SRL Aprillus asistencia e investigacion

🇦🇷

Buenos Aires, Argentina

Halitus Instituto Medico S.A. - Dermatologia y Estetica

🇦🇷

Caba, Argentina

Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires

🇦🇷

Caba, Argentina

Universitaetsklinikum Duesseldorf

🇩🇪

Duesseldorf, Germany

Universitaetsklinikum Hamburg Eppendorf

🇩🇪

Hamburg, Germany

MensingDerma research GmbH

🇩🇪

Hamburg, Germany

Universitaetsklinikum Schleswig Holstein Campus Kiel

🇩🇪

Kiel, Germany

Asahikawa Medical University Hospital

🇯🇵

Hokkaido, Japan

Tokai University Hospital

🇯🇵

Isehara, Japan

Teikyo University Hospital

🇯🇵

Itabashi Ku, Japan

St Marianna University Hospital

🇯🇵

Kawasaki City, Japan

Hospital of the University of Occupational and Enviromental Health

🇯🇵

Kitakyushu-shi, Japan

Nagoya City University Hospital

🇯🇵

Nagoya, Japan

Takagi Dermatological Clinic

🇯🇵

Obihiro shi, Japan

Kindai University Hospital

🇯🇵

Osaka Sayama shi, Japan

Public Interest Incorporated Foundation Nipoon Life Saiseikai Nippon Life Hospital

🇯🇵

Osaka, Japan

Kume Clinic

🇯🇵

Sakai-shi, Japan

Sapporo Skin Clinic

🇯🇵

Sapporo shi, Japan

Tokyo Medical University Hospital

🇯🇵

Tokyo, Japan

Seoul National University Hospital

🇰🇷

Seoul, Korea, Republic of

Hanyang University Medical Center

🇰🇷

Seoul, Korea, Republic of

Konkuk University Medical Center

🇰🇷

Seoul, Korea, Republic of

The Catholic University of Korea Seoul St Marys Hospital

🇰🇷

Seoul, Korea, Republic of

Kyung Hee University Hospital

🇰🇷

Seoul, Korea, Republic of

Specderm Poznanska sp j

🇵🇱

Bialystok, Poland

Osteo-Medic s.c A. Racewicz, J Supronik

🇵🇱

Bialystok, Poland

Centrum Kliniczno Badawcze J Brzezicki B Gornikiewicz Brzezicka Lekarze Spolka Partnerska

🇵🇱

Elblag, Poland

Specjalistyczny gabinet dermatologiczny Aplikacyjno Badawczy Marek Brzewski Pawel Brzewski Spolka Cywilna

🇵🇱

Krakow, Poland

Centrum Medyczne dr Rajzer Sp z o o

🇵🇱

Krakow, Poland

Centrum Medyczne Promed

🇵🇱

Krakow, Poland

Dermed Centrum Medyczne Sp z o o

🇵🇱

Lodz, Poland

Centrum Terapii Wspolczesnej J M Jasnorzewska Spolka Komandytowo Akcyjna

🇵🇱

Lodz, Poland

Dermodent Centrum Medyczne Aldona Czajkowska Rafal Czajkowski S C

🇵🇱

Osielsko, Poland

SOLUMED Centrum Medyczne

🇵🇱

Poznan, Poland

Clinical Research Center sp z o o MEDIC R s k

🇵🇱

Poznan, Poland

Dorota Bystrzanowska High-Med. Przychodnia Specjalistyczna

🇵🇱

Warszawa, Poland

Klinika Ambroziak Dermatologia

🇵🇱

Warszawa, Poland

DERMMEDICA Sp.z o.o.

🇵🇱

Wroclaw, Poland

Wro Medica

🇵🇱

Wroclaw, Poland

Centrum Medyczne Oporow

🇵🇱

Wroclaw, Poland

Hosp. Gral. Univ. Dr. Balmis

🇪🇸

Alicante, Spain

Hosp. Univ. de Cruces

🇪🇸

Barakaldo, Spain

Hosp. de La Santa Creu I Sant Pau

🇪🇸

Barcelona, Spain

Hosp. Univ. San Cecilio

🇪🇸

Granada, Spain

Hosp. Univ. de Bellvitge

🇪🇸

L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain

Grupo Dermatologico Y Estetico Pedro Jaen

🇪🇸

Madrid, Spain

Hosp. Gral. Univ. Gregorio Maranon

🇪🇸

Madrid, Spain

Hosp. Univ. 12 de Octubre

🇪🇸

Madrid, Spain

National Taiwan University Hospital

🇨🇳

Taipei, Taiwan

Taipei Mackay Memorial Hospital

🇨🇳

Taipei, Taiwan

Taipei Veterans General Hospital

🇨🇳

Taipei, Taiwan

Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

🇨🇳

Taoyuan, Taiwan

University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust

🇬🇧

Southampton, United Kingdom

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath