Compare the Clinical Efficacy of Prototype Toothpastes.
- Conditions
- Gingival Diseases
- Interventions
- Registration Number
- NCT00761930
- Lead Sponsor
- Colgate Palmolive
- Brief Summary
Evaluate clinical efficacy of a prototype toothpaste on control of dental plaque gingival inflammation
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 103
- Male or female volunteers 18-65 years of age
- Good general health
- Must sign informed consent form
- Minimum of 16 natural uncrowned teeth (excluding third molars) must be present.
- No history of allergy to personal care consumer products, or their ingredients,
- relevant to any ingredient in the test products as determined by the dental/medical
- Professional monitoring the study.
- Dental Selection Criteria: Average full mouth GI score should be in the range of
-
- 2.0. heavy plaque formers should be avoided. Target a full mouth PI
- (Quigley-Hein) to be in the range of 1.5-3.0
- If of child bearing potential and on birth control (diaphragm, birth control pills,
- Birth control implants, IUD (Intrauterine device), condoms)
- Subjects unable or unwilling to sign the informed consent form.
- Medical condition which requires pre-medication prior to dental visits/procedures
- Moderate or advanced periodontal disease
- 2 or more decayed untreated dental sites at screening.
- Other disease of the hard or soft oral tissues.
- Impaired salivary function (e.g. Sjogren's syndrome or head and neck irradiation).
- Use of medications that are currently affect salivary flow.
- Use of antibiotics or antimicrobial drugs within 30 days prior to study visit #1.
- Pregnant or nursing women.
- Participation in any other clinical study within 1 week prior to enrollment into this
- study.
- Use of tobacco products
- Subjects who must receive dental treatment during the study dates.
- Current use of Antibiotics for any purpose.
- History of allergy to common dentifrice ingredients
- Presence of an orthodontic appliance which interferes with plaque scoring.
- History of allergy to natural remedies, such as herbal ingredients
- Immune compromised individuals (HIV, AIDS, immuno suppressive drug therapy)
- Smoker
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description A Fluoride commercially available Fluoride toothpaste B Triclosan and fluoride fluoride/triclosan/copolymer toothpaste C Herbal Ingredient and fluoride fluoride/herbal toothpaste
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Gingivitis Score 6 weeks Gingivitis score (GI)= Units on a scale 0 to 3 (0 = no inflammation,
1 = Mild inflammation-slight change in color and little change in texture 2 = Moderate inflammation-moderate glazing, redness, edema and hypertrophy. Tendency to bleed upon probing. 3 = Severe inflammation-marked redness and hypertrophy. Tendency to spontaneous bleeding. GI scored=sum of GI scores divided by the number of sites (gingival gum line around the tooth)scored.Dental Plaque 6 weeks Quigley Hein Method: Units on a scale 0 to 5 (0 = no plaque, 1 = separate flecks of plaque on the tooth, 2 = a thin continuous band of plaque, 3 = a band of plaque up to one-third of the tooth, 4 = plaque covering up to two thirds of the of the tooth, 5 = plaque covering two-thirds or more of the crown of the tooth. Plaque score= sum of all scores divided by the number of sites (teeth) scored.
Bleeding Index (EIBI) 6 weeks Eastman Interdental Bleeding Index Scores (EIBI) measures the number of interdental spaces that bleed, divided by number of interdental spaces studied to yield a score with a minimum of O and a maximum of 1 (0=no bleeding \& 1= bleeding) The number of spots between teeth that bleed are divided by number of spots between teeth that are scored and may be expressed as a percent when multiplied by 100.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Eastman Dental Center - University of Rochester
🇺🇸Rochester, New York, United States