Skip to main content
MedPathMedPath Home
Clinical Trials/ISRCTN16583435
ISRCTN16583435
Completed
Not Applicable

A prospective, randomised, double-blinded study to compare bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate (bipolar TURP) versus monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate (monopolar TURP) in terms of safety and efficacy

Academic Medical Center (AMC), Department of Urology (The Netherlands)0 sites94 target enrollmentJuly 21, 2006
Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to LinkedInShare to Reddit

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Not specified
Sponsor
Academic Medical Center (AMC), Department of Urology (The Netherlands)
Enrollment
94
Status
Completed
Last Updated
11 years ago
OverviewInvestigatorsEligibility CriteriaOutcomesSimilar Trials

Overview

Brief Summary

No summary available.

Registry
who.int
Start Date
July 21, 2006
End Date
TBD
Last Updated
11 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
Academic Medical Center (AMC), Department of Urology (The Netherlands)

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • •1\. Candidates for transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP)
  • •2\. Qmax less than 16 ml/sec
  • •3\. International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) score greater than 14
  • •4\. Voided volume greater than 125
  • •5\. Patients in retention with an indwelling catheter or intermittent catheterisation
  • •6\. Informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

  • •1\. If patient is suspected to be suffering from prostate cancer
  • •2\. Prior prostate surgery, including minimal invasive therapies
  • •3\. Active urinary tract infection
  • •4\. Known or suspected neurogenic decompensated bladder (postvoid residual urine volume \[PVR] greater than 400ml/sec) or compensated detrusor function
  • •5\. Immunosuppression; using prednisone
  • •6\. Known or suspected malignant disease affecting the bladder or lower urinary tract
  • •7\. 5\-alpha\-reductase inhibitor within the last three months before baseline
  • •8\. Alpha\-blockers within the last six weeks before baseline
  • •9\. Specific severe heart disease in whom anti\-coagulant therapy might jeopardize treatment outcome

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Not specified

Similar Trials

Recruiting
Phase 2
A comparison of the effects of ketamine versus propofol (sedation) on blood flow to the brain in patients of traumtic brain injuryHealth Condition 1: G936- Cerebral edema
CTRI/2023/07/055227Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research Chandigarh
Completed
Phase 3
A study to compare 2 medications-Phenylephrine and Norepinephrine to prevent fall in blood pressure caused after giving spinal anaesthesia in patients undergoing Caesarean section.Health Condition 1: O295- Other complications of spinal andepidural anesthesia during pregnancy
CTRI/2020/03/023761AIIMS Raipur95
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
use of melatonin to decrease the hemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and intubatio
CTRI/2018/05/013835Sri Ramachandra University
Not yet recruiting
Phase 2
A Study Comparing two drugs(Granisetron and Ramosetron ) in preventing low blood pressure in pregnant patients undergoing caesarean section under spinal anesthesia using hyperbaric levobupivacaine.Health Condition 1: O30-O48- Maternal care related to the fetus and amniotic cavity and possible delivery problemsHealth Condition 2: O00-O9A- Pregnancy, childbirth and the puerperium
CTRI/2024/03/063785Department of anaesthesiology
Active, not recruiting
Phase 3
A study to compare nebulized fentanyl, dexmedetomedine and magnesium sulphate for attenuation of stress response to laryngoscopy and intubatioHealth Condition 1: 4- Measurement and Monitoring
CTRI/2021/09/036806esic medical college and hospitalfaridabad