MedPath

Transparent Cap-Assisted Colonoscopy Combined With Computer-Aided Detection in Improving the Detection Rate of Colorectal Adenomas

Not Applicable
Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Colorectal Adenoma
Registration Number
NCT07097350
Lead Sponsor
Fudan University
Brief Summary

A prospective, single-center, single-blind, randomized controlled study to compare the effectiveness of transparent cap-assisted colonoscopy combined with computer-aided detection and computer-aided detection alone in improvement of adenoma detection rate

Detailed Description

1. Patients are undergone screening or surveillance colonoscopy at the Endoscopy department of Gastrointestinal endoscopy center of Huadong hospital affiliated to Fudan University.

2. Randomize into 2 interventional groups based on Random function of Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) 20.0, including (1) Group 1: computer-aided detection alone and (2) Group 2: transparent cap-assisted computer-aided detection.

3. Collecting variables which consist of primary and secodary outcomes.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
524
Inclusion Criteria
  • aged 45-75 years
Exclusion Criteria
  • Patients scheduled for therapeutic colonoscopy as postoperative surveillance after colorectal surgery, post-polypectomy follow-up, or treatment of histologically confirmed polyps
  • Patients with highly suspected or pathologically confirmed colorectal cancer
  • Patients presenting with alarm symptoms or signs (hematochezia, melena, unexplained anemia or weight loss, palpable abdominal mass, or a positive digital rectal examination)
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women
  • Patients with gastrointestinal obstruction
  • Patients with inflammatory bowel disease, familial adenomatous polyposis, or serrated polyposis syndrome
  • Patients who have taken anticoagulants (e.g., aspirin, warfarin) within 7 days before colonoscopy or who have coagulation disorders
  • Patients currently enrolled in another clinical study or who participated in any clinical trial within the past 60 days
  • Insertion failure for any reason (e.g., scope cannot pass an obstruction, patient cannot tolerate the procedure) or colonoscopy not reaching the cecum
  • A Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) score < 6 at scope insertion (inadequate preparation requiring repeat bowel cleansing)
  • Use of non-guideline-recommended bowel preparation agents
  • Patients undergoing emergency colonoscopy

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
adenoma detection rate2 weeks after the procedure
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
sessile serrated lesion detection rate2 weeks after the procedure
advanced adenoma detection rate2 weeks after the procedure
polyp detection rate2 weeks after the procedure
Clinically Significant Immediate Post-polypectomy Bleeding(CSIPB)rateimmediately after the procedure

CSIPB was defined as any bleeding not responding to water jet irrigation or STSC and therefore requiring either coagu lation forceps or mechanical clips to achieve hemostasis

Clinically Significant Delayed Post-polypectomy Bleeding(CSDPB)rate2 weeks after the procedure

CSPEB was defined as any bleeding after completion of the procedure requiring emergency room presentation, hospital isation or re-intervention (endoscopy, angiography, surgery).

perforation rateimmediately after the procedure

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Huadong hospital, Fudan university

🇨🇳

Shanghai, Shanghai, China

Huadong hospital, Fudan university
🇨🇳Shanghai, Shanghai, China
Danian Ji, M.D.
Contact
+86-18019094606
arctg4@163.com
Zhiyu Dong, M.D.
Contact
+86-18817870866
18817870866@163.com

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.