Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT06504069
NCT06504069
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable

Effectiveness of a Virtual Reality (VR) Intervention for Prosocial Behavior and Well-being Among Adolescents: A Randomized Controlled Trial

The Hong Kong Polytechnic University0 sites160 target enrollmentSeptember 1, 2024
ConditionsAdolescent

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Adolescent
Sponsor
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Enrollment
160
Primary Endpoint
Prosocial identity
Status
Not yet recruiting
Last Updated
last year

Overview

Brief Summary

The aim of this project is to examine the effectiveness of a gamified prosocial VR intervention.

Detailed Description

There are two parts in this study. In the first part of the study, participants will be first directed to complete a background survey online (approximately 20 minutes). In the second part of the study, participants will participate in a 5-session gamified training program, one session a week for five consecutive weeks, each session lasts between 10-15 minutes. Upon completion of each session, participants will be required to complete a short 5-minute online survey. A daily diary study will be conducted during the intervention to monitor the nuance behavioral and attitudinal changes.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
September 1, 2024
End Date
September 1, 2026
Last Updated
last year
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • School students aged 10-16 (i.e., primary 5 to secondary 5);
  • Able to communicate in Chinese.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Significant cognitive impairment;
  • Self-reported severe motion sickness;
  • Uncorrected visual impairment.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Prosocial identity

Time Frame: Baseline (pre-intervention); immediately after the intervention (post-intervention); 1 month after intervention (follow-up)

The Internalization subscale of the Self Importance of Moral Identity Scale (SIMIS) will be used to measure the construct of prosocial identity. Participants will rate each item on a 7-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). Elevated scores on the scale indicate a greater degree of prosocial identity.

Altruism

Time Frame: Baseline (pre-intervention); immediately after the intervention (post-intervention); 1 month after intervention (follow-up)

Two items from the Preference Survey Module (PSM) will be modified to measure altruism. One example item is as follows: "Imagine the following scenario: you have won 1,000 Euros in a lottery. Considering your present circumstances, how much of the prize would you donate to a charitable cause? (Values between 0 and 1000 are permissible)." Higher scores on this item indicate a higher level of altruistic behavior or tendencies.

Prosocial attitudes

Time Frame: Baseline (pre-intervention); immediately after the intervention (post-intervention); 1 month after intervention (follow-up)

Three items assessing prosocial attitudes will be revised from the Prosocial Orientation Questionnaire. Participants will rate each item on a 6-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 6 (strongly agree). Higher scores on the scale indicate a greater presence of positive prosocial attitudes.

Prosocial intention

Time Frame: Baseline (pre-intervention); immediately after the intervention (post-intervention); 1 month after intervention (follow-up)

The Prosocial Behavioral Intentions Scale (PBIS) will be employed to evaluate individuals' future intentions to engage in prosocial behavior. Participants will rate each item on a 7-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (Definitely would not do this) to 7 (Definitely would do this). Increased scores on the scale indicate a greater inclination towards prosocial intentions.

Subjective happiness

Time Frame: Baseline (pre-intervention); immediately after the intervention (post-intervention); 1 month after intervention (follow-up)

The Subjective Happiness Scale (SHS) will be utilized to assess participants' subjective happiness. Each item will be rated on a 7-point Likert scale. Elevated scores on the scale indicate a greater level of subjective happiness.

Subjective vitality

Time Frame: Baseline (pre-intervention); immediately after the intervention (post-intervention); 1 month after intervention (follow-up)

Three items from the Subjective Vitality Scale (SVS) will be used to measure participants' subjective vitality. Each item will be rated on a 7-point Likert scale. Higher scores indicate a higher level of subjective vitality.

Self-esteem

Time Frame: Baseline (pre-intervention); immediately after the intervention (post-intervention); 1 month after intervention (follow-up)

The Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale (RSE) will be used to measure self-esteem. Each item will be rated on a 4-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (strongly agree) to 4(strongly disagree). Higher scores indicate higher levels of self esteem.

Daily subjective happiness

Time Frame: Daily monitoring for 5 weeks during the intervention

Daily subjective happiness will be measured using a condensed 2-item adaptation of the Subjective Happiness Scale (SHS). The first item will assess their self-perceived general happiness today on a scale from 1 (not at all happy) to 7 (very happy). The second item will gauge their comparative happiness to their peers during the same timeframe, ranging from 1 (less happy) to 7 (more happy). Higher scores indicate a higher level of daily subjective happiness.

Daily psychological needs

Time Frame: Daily monitoring for 5 weeks during the intervention

Daily psychological needs will be assessed using a 9-item Basic Psychological Needs Scale (BPNS). Each subscale, namely competence, autonomy, and relatedness, consists of 3 items rated on a 7-point scale (ranging from 1 = not at all true to 7 = very true). Higher scores indicate a higher level of daily psychological needs.

Empathy

Time Frame: Baseline (pre-intervention); immediately after the intervention (post-intervention); 1 month after intervention (follow-up)

The Single Item Trait Empathy Scale (SITES) will be utilized to assess levels of empathy. Participants will rate this item on a 7-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree), with higher scores indicating a greater degree of empathy.

Daily subjective vitality

Time Frame: Daily monitoring for 5 weeks during the intervention

Daily subjective vitality will be assessed using 3 representative items from the 7-item Subjective Vitality Scale (SVS). All items will be rated on a 7-point scale (1 = not at all true to 7 = very true). Higher scores indicate a higher level of daily subjective vitality.

Attitudes toward helping others

Time Frame: Baseline (pre-intervention); immediately after the intervention (post-intervention); 1 month after intervention (follow-up)

The Attitudes toward Helping Others Scale (AHO) will be employed to assess individuals' attitudes towards helping others. Each item will be rated on a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Elevated scores on the scale indicate a greater presence of positive attitudes towards helping others.

Life satisfaction

Time Frame: Baseline (pre-intervention); immediately after the intervention (post-intervention); 1 month after intervention (follow-up)

The Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS) will be employed to evaluate levels of life satisfaction. Participants will rate each item on a 7-point Likert scale, ranging from "Strongly Disagree" to "Strongly Agree." Elevated scores on the scale indicate greater levels of life satisfaction.

Affect

Time Frame: Baseline (pre-intervention); immediately after the intervention (post-intervention); 1 month after intervention (follow-up)

The Emmons Mood Indicator will be employed to measure affect, encompassing two dimensions: Positive Affect and Negative Affect. Each item will be rated on a 7-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (not at all) to 7 (extremely). Elevated scores on the scale indicate a higher level of affect.

Daily gratitude

Time Frame: Daily monitoring for 5 weeks during the intervention

Daily gratitude will be measured using one item from the Gratitude Adjective Checklist (GAC). This item will be rated on a 7-point Likert scale. A higher score indicates a higher level of daily gratitude.

Gratitude

Time Frame: Baseline (pre-intervention); immediately after the intervention (post-intervention); 1 month after intervention (follow-up)

One item from the Gratitude Adjective Checklist (GAC) will be used to measure participants' gratitude. This item will be rated on a 7-point Likert scale. A higher score indicate a higher level of gratitude.

Daily well-being

Time Frame: Daily monitoring for 5 weeks during the intervention

Daily well-being will be assessed using a single item ("How do you feel right now?") adapted from the Well-Being Manifestations Measure Scale (WBMMS) using a sliding scale ranging from 0 (not good at all) to 100 (very good). A higher score indicates a higher level of daily well-being.

Daily prosocial act

Time Frame: Daily monitoring for 5 weeks during the intervention

Daily prosocial act will be measured by one item: "How many acts have you engaged today that involve helping someone else or doing something for a good cause?" Participants will indicate the number of prosocial acts from a drop-down menu ranging from 0 to 10+. The response of "0" will be classified as "no prosocial engagement," and responses of "1" or more will be classified as "having engaged in prosocial acts."

Daily affect

Time Frame: Daily monitoring for 5 weeks during the intervention

Daily affect will be evaluated using the 9-item Emmons Mood Indicator. Participants will be instructed to rate the extent to which they experienced each emotion today using a 7-point scale (ranging from 1 = not at all to 7 = extremely). Elevated scores on the scale indicate a higher level of daily affect.

Daily self-esteem

Time Frame: Daily monitoring for 5 weeks during the intervention

Daily self-esteem will be evaluated using 2 items from the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (Rosenberg, 1965). Ratings will be evaluated on a 4-point scale (1 = strongly disagree to 4 = strongly agree). Higher scores indicate a higher level of daily self-esteem.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Intervention satisfaction(immediately after the intervention (post-intervention))
  • Levels of difficulty(immediately after the intervention (post-intervention))
  • Levels of interest(immediately after the intervention (post-intervention))
  • Feelings in the VR(immediately after the intervention (post-intervention))

Similar Trials