Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT03620136
NCT03620136
Completed
Phase 3

Comparison of Two Techniques of Locoregional Analgesia in Total Knee Prosthesis Surgery : Block to the Adductor Channel Versus Peri-articular Local Infiltrations

Hospices Civils de Lyon1 site in 1 country98 target enrollmentFebruary 7, 2018

Overview

Phase
Phase 3
Intervention
locoregional analgesia by a block on the adductor channel
Conditions
Analgesic
Sponsor
Hospices Civils de Lyon
Enrollment
98
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
the cumulative consumption of MORPHINE
Status
Completed
Last Updated
7 months ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The post-operative pain generated by prosthetic knee replacement surgery is known to be moderate to severe during two or three days following surgery.

The most popular analgesic technique after prosthetic knee replacement surgery remains the femoral block (FB), whether in single injection or continuous infusion. In major knee surgery, FBs provide better analgesia compared to systemic morphine and FBs provide the same analgesia that obtained with epidural analgesia but with fewer associated adverse effects.

Although FBs provide excellent post-operative analgesia after total knee prosthesis, they also provide a significant quadricepsia weakness that increases the risk of severe falls and complications, and hinders the rapid rehabilitation process. For these reasons, alternative analgesic techniques have emerged in recent years.

To avoid the quadricipital motor block generated by FBs, some authors proposed the administration of local anesthetics in the adductor channel, also known as the Hunter channel, in order to produce a pure sensory block. With the development of ultrasound, the adductor channel is easily visualized in the middle of the thigh. This allows the adductor channel block (ACB) to be realized with a high success rate. ACB appears to decrease postoperative pain and morphine consumption. It also significantly improves the ability of patients to walk around after Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) surgery.

With the same goal of quadricipital savings, the use of the analgesic technique by periarticular infiltration of local anesthetics (ILA) has spread in recent years, due to the fact that an analgesic technique of simple realization and without apparent danger, and this despite limited evidence of its effectiveness.

The Croix-Rousse Hospital is a university hospital in Lyon with a highly developed orthopedic surgery center, producing approximately 550 TKA per year. During the year 2016, approximately half were benefited from post-operative analgesia management by ACB, and the other half by the implementation of the ILA.

To date few studies have been interested in comparing these two analgesic techniques in knee prosthesis surgery.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
February 7, 2018
End Date
November 28, 2019
Last Updated
7 months ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Major patients (≥18 years),
  • Having an American Society of Anesthesiology score (ASA) I to III
  • To benefit from first and unilateral prosthetic replacement surgery of knee under spinal anesthesia,
  • Having social security scheme,
  • Having received informed information and having signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

  • Pregnant women (diagnosis of interrogation),
  • Breastfeeding women
  • Patients under tutorship or curatorship,
  • Persons who can not receive sufficient information because of disturbances of superior functions or because of insufficient command of the French language according to the judgment of the investigator,
  • A history of chronic neuropathic pain in the leg to be operated on,
  • Patients who have undergone prior surgery on the knee to perform surgery,
  • Contra-indication to loco-regional anesthesia: known allergy to local anesthetics,
  • Contra-indication to the use of ROPIVACAINE: known hypersensitivity to the active substance or other amide-linked local anesthetics, hypovolemia
  • A morbid obesity (Body Mass Index (BMI)\> 40),
  • Severe renal insufficiency (Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) \<30mL / min),

Arms & Interventions

locoregional analgesia by a block on the adductor channel

Intervention: locoregional analgesia by a block on the adductor channel

locoregional analgesia by periarticular local infiltrations

Intervention: locoregional analgesia by periarticular local infiltrations

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

the cumulative consumption of MORPHINE

Time Frame: during the first 48 hours following the surgical incision

cumulative dose of morphine (miligrams). The administration of morphine will be done using a self-controlled analgesic pump (PCA). It will be made available to the patient when he leaves the block. The PCA allows the patient to adapt his consumption of morphine to his needs in analgesics. A nurse regularly reports the amount of morphine that the patient has administered.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Functional capabilities and rehabilitation(at day 3)
  • Pain at rest(Resting pain will be measured every 4 hours in the first 24 hours, then every 8 hours between 24 and 72 hours)
  • pain in movement(at day 3)
  • quality of the analgesia(within 48 hours after the surgical incision time)
  • Patient satisfaction(at day 3)
  • quality of the analgesia offered by the ACB(within 48 hours after the injection to the adductor channel)
  • quality of the analgesia offered by the ILA(within 48 hours after the end of surgery)
  • Duration of hospitalization(at day 3)
  • Secondary complications due to adductor channel block(Day 0 : At the time of the ACB in the pre-induction room)
  • Complications secondary to analgesic medications and surgery(at day 3)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials