MedPath

Standard Care With LLLT & Myofascial Release Versus Standard Care Alone in Pregnant Women With Temporomandibular Disorder

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Temporomandibular Disorder
Interventions
Other: Standard care
Other: Low Level laser therapy
Other: Myofascial release
Registration Number
NCT05138354
Lead Sponsor
October 6 University
Brief Summary

This study will investigate a novel approach to treat pregnant women with tempromandibular disorder using a combined method of low level laser therapy, myofascial release and standard care versus standard care alone. It's hopeful that the results of this study can fill the gap of knowledge surrounding the conservative treatment options for TMD in order to help patients restore their oral function properly and promote new ways of addressing TMD.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
Female
Target Recruitment
30
Inclusion Criteria
  • Pregnant women diagnosed with myofascial TMD according to the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders
Exclusion Criteria
  • facial neuro-musculoskeletal pathologies (i.e., facial trauma and/or fractures, and bell's palsy)
  • acute infections or systemic disorders
  • osteoporosis
  • cervical spine or upper limb dysfunction
  • steroid infiltration4
  • any recent dental treatment taken or surgery over TMJ
  • hypermobile joint
  • neurological impairments

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Control groupStandard carePatients received a 4-week treatment program (12 treatment sessions, three times a week). Patients received the conservative treatment protocol comprised of ultrasound, hot pack application, and exercises.
Intervention groupLow Level laser therapyPatients received a 4-week treatment program (12 treatment sessions, three times a week). Patients received LLLT and myofascial release combined with the control intervention. the conservative treatment protocol comprised of ultrasound, hot pack application, and exercises
Intervention groupStandard carePatients received a 4-week treatment program (12 treatment sessions, three times a week). Patients received LLLT and myofascial release combined with the control intervention. the conservative treatment protocol comprised of ultrasound, hot pack application, and exercises
Intervention groupMyofascial releasePatients received a 4-week treatment program (12 treatment sessions, three times a week). Patients received LLLT and myofascial release combined with the control intervention. the conservative treatment protocol comprised of ultrasound, hot pack application, and exercises
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Changes in visual analogue scaleBaseline and after 4 weeks

Visual analog scale (VAS), a grading scale range from 0 to 100 mm. 0 mm represented no pain or discomfort at all and 100 mm represented the greatest amount of pain or discomfort imaginable. Participant drew a line that intersects the grading scale to show the amount of pain or discomfort that he or she experienced at that moment. The assessor then used a ruler to measure the length from 0 mm to the intersecting line and recorded the value.

Changes in pain pressure threshold (PPT)Baseline and after 4 weeks

Comparing pain pressure threshold differences on both sides over TMJ, masseter and anterior temporalis.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Limitations of daily function in temporomandibular disorder questionnaireBaseline and after 4 weeks

The limitations in daily functions in the temporomandibular disorder questionnaire (LDF-TMDQ) assess participants' functionality by asking them to report how much the jaw problem prevents or limits their performance in a list of 10 daily activities

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

October 6 University Hospital

🇪🇬

Al Ḩayy Ath Thāmin, Giza, Egypt

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath